These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31153510)

  • 1. Comparison of automated grading of digital orthodontic models and hand grading of 3-dimensionally printed models.
    Scott JD; English JD; Cozad BE; Borders CL; Harris LM; Moon AL; Kasper FK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Jun; 155(6):886-890. PubMed ID: 31153510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the accuracy of digital model analysis for the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system for dental casts.
    Costalos PA; Sarraf K; Cangialosi TJ; Efstratiadis S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Nov; 128(5):624-9. PubMed ID: 16286210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system: digital vs plaster dental casts.
    Okunami TR; Kusnoto B; BeGole E; Evans CA; Sadowsky C; Fadavi S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jan; 131(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 17208106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of print layer height on the assessment of 3D-printed models.
    Loflin WA; English JD; Borders C; Harris LM; Moon A; Holland JN; Kasper FK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Aug; 156(2):283-289. PubMed ID: 31375239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of a software program for applying the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system to digital casts.
    Hildebrand JC; Palomo JM; Palomo L; Sivik M; Hans M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Feb; 133(2):283-9. PubMed ID: 18249296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical outcomes of 0.018-inch and 0.022-inch bracket slot using the ABO objective grading system.
    Detterline DA; Isikbay SC; Brizendine EJ; Kula KS
    Angle Orthod; 2010 May; 80(3):528-32. PubMed ID: 20050748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of stereolithographically printed digital models compared to plaster models.
    Camardella LT; Vilella OV; van Hezel MM; Breuning KH
    J Orofac Orthop; 2017 Sep; 78(5):394-402. PubMed ID: 28361165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The excellence challenge in orthodontics: clinical use of an objective grading system for orthodontic cases.
    Cordua T; Ursini R; Giuliante L; Deli R
    Prog Orthod; 2009; 10(2):4-15. PubMed ID: 20545087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of print layer height and printer type on the accuracy of 3-dimensional printed orthodontic models.
    Favero CS; English JD; Cozad BE; Wirthlin JO; Short MM; Kasper FK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Oct; 152(4):557-565. PubMed ID: 28962741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-term posttreatment changes measured by the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system.
    Nett BC; Huang GJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):444-50; quiz 516. PubMed ID: 15821689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of university and private-practice orthodontic treatment outcomes with the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system.
    Cook DR; Harris EF; Vaden JL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jun; 127(6):707-12. PubMed ID: 15953896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predicted and actual end-of-treatment occlusion produced with aligner therapy.
    Buschang PH; Ross M; Shaw SG; Crosby D; Campbell PM
    Angle Orthod; 2015 Sep; 85(5):723-7. PubMed ID: 25372019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of virtual and manual tooth setups with digital and plaster models in extraction cases.
    Im J; Cha JY; Lee KJ; Yu HS; Hwang CJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Apr; 145(4):434-42. PubMed ID: 24703281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Validation of subjective and objective evaluation methods for orthodontic treatment outcome].
    Song GY; Jiang RP; Zhang XY; Liu SQ; Yu XN; Chen Q; Weng XR; Wu WZ; Su H; Ren C; Shan RK; Geng Z; Xu TM;
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2015 Feb; 47(1):90-7. PubMed ID: 25686336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of current additive manufacturing systems for orthodontic 3-dimensional printing.
    Akyalcin S; Rutkowski P; Arrigo M; Trotman CA; Kasper FK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Oct; 160(4):594-602. PubMed ID: 34579820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Treatment outcome differences between pass and fail scores and correlation between cephalometric changes and cast-radiograph evaluation of the American Board of Orthodontics.
    Neoh SP; Komoltri C; Viwattanatipa N
    J Orthod Sci; 2018; 7():22. PubMed ID: 30547018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Treatment outcome in a graduate orthodontic clinic using the American Board of Orthodontics grading system.
    Yang-Powers LC; Sadowsky C; Rosenstein S; BeGole EA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Nov; 122(5):451-5. PubMed ID: 12439471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of printed dental models made with 2 prototype technologies and different designs of model bases.
    Camardella LT; de Vasconcellos Vilella O; Breuning H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Jun; 151(6):1178-1187. PubMed ID: 28554463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Long-term occlusal changes assessed by the American Board of Orthodontics' model grading system.
    Aszkler RM; Preston CB; Saltaji H; Tabbaa S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Feb; 145(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 24485731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. University clinic and private practice treatment outcomes in Class I extraction and nonextraction patients: A comparative study with the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System.
    Mislik B; Konstantonis D; Katsadouris A; Eliades T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Feb; 149(2):253-8. PubMed ID: 26827982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.