190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31153550)
1. Predicting lymph node metastasis in pancreatobiliary cancer with magnetic resonance imaging: A prospective analysis.
Lee JH; Han SS; Hong EK; Cho HJ; Joo J; Park EY; Woo SM; Kim TH; Lee WJ; Park SJ
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Jul; 116():1-7. PubMed ID: 31153550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) in differentiating between benign and metastatic lymph nodes in cases of cholangiocarcinoma.
Promsorn J; Soontrapa W; Somsap K; Chamadol N; Limpawattana P; Harisinghani M
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Feb; 44(2):473-481. PubMed ID: 30151713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intravoxel incoherent motion magnetic resonance imaging for differentiating metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Rong D; Mao Y; Hu W; Xu S; Wang J; He H; Li S; Zhang R
Eur Radiol; 2018 Jul; 28(7):2781-2789. PubMed ID: 29404768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validity of 3-Tesla diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for distinction of reactive and metastatic lymph nodes in head-and-neck carcinoma.
Vijayalakshmi K; Raghuram PH; Saravanan K; Krithika CL; Kannan A
J Cancer Res Ther; 2020; 16(3):587-593. PubMed ID: 32719272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging increases diagnostic accuracy of breast MR imaging for predicting axillary metastases in breast cancer patients.
Guvenc I; Whitman GJ; Liu P; Yalniz C; Ma J; Dogan BE
Breast J; 2019 Jan; 25(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 30444286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Apparent diffusion coefficient for discriminating metastatic from non-metastatic lymph nodes in primary rectal cancer.
Cho EY; Kim SH; Yoon JH; Lee Y; Lim YJ; Kim SJ; Baek HJ; Eun CK
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Nov; 82(11):e662-8. PubMed ID: 24016824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of axillary lymph nodes in patients with breast cancer with diffusion-weighted MR imaging in combination with routine and dynamic contrast MR imaging.
Razek AA; Lattif MA; Denewer A; Farouk O; Nada N
Breast Cancer; 2016 May; 23(3):525-32. PubMed ID: 25763535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic Value of Diffusion Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Evaluation of Metastatic Neck Lymph Nodes in Head and Neck Cancer: A Sample of Iranian Patient.
Alamolhoda F; Faeghi F; Bakhshandeh M; Ahmadi A; Sanei Taheri M; Aabbasi S
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2019 Jun; 20(6):1789-1795. PubMed ID: 31244301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Combining tumor size and diffusion-weighted imaging to diagnose normal-sized metastatic pelvic lymph nodes in cervical cancers.
Song J; Hu Q; Huang J; Ma Z; Chen T
Acta Radiol; 2019 Mar; 60(3):388-395. PubMed ID: 29911401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diffusion weighted images of metastatic as compared with nonmetastatic axillary lymph nodes in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer.
Yamaguchi K; Schacht D; Nakazono T; Irie H; Abe H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Sep; 42(3):771-8. PubMed ID: 25556886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predicting metastasis in clinically negative axillary lymph nodes with minimum apparent diffusion coefficient value in luminal A-like breast cancer.
Kato F; Kudo K; Yamashita H; Baba M; Shimizu A; Oyama-Manabe N; Kinoshita R; Li R; Shirato H
Breast Cancer; 2019 Sep; 26(5):628-636. PubMed ID: 30937834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Detection of axillary lymph node metastasis with diffusion-weighted MR imaging.
Iima M; Kataoka M; Okumura R; Togashi K
Clin Imaging; 2014; 38(5):633-6. PubMed ID: 24908365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Feasibility and reproducibility of T2 mapping and DWI for identifying malignant lymph nodes in rectal cancer.
Ge YX; Hu SD; Wang Z; Guan RP; Zhou XY; Gao QZ; Yan G
Eur Radiol; 2021 May; 31(5):3347-3354. PubMed ID: 33185752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in characterization of axillary lymph nodes: Preliminary animal experience.
Zhu Y; Li X; Wang F; Zhang J; Li W; Ma Y; Qi J; Ren S; Ye Z
Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Oct; 52():46-52. PubMed ID: 29852212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Apparent diffusion coefficient for lymph node characterization after chemoradiation therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer.
Kim SH; Ryu KH; Yoon JH; Lee Y; Paik JH; Kim SJ; Jung HK; Lee KH
Acta Radiol; 2015 Dec; 56(12):1446-53. PubMed ID: 25425724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Lymph node metastasis in head and neck squamous carcinoma: Efficacy of intravoxel incoherent motion magnetic resonance imaging for the differential diagnosis.
Liang L; Luo X; Lian Z; Chen W; Zhang B; Dong Y; Liang C; Zhang S
Eur J Radiol; 2017 May; 90():159-165. PubMed ID: 28583628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Application of apparent diffusion coefficient values derived from diffusion-weighted imaging for assessing different sized metastatic lymph nodes in cervical cancers.
Zhang A; Song J; Ma Z; Chen T
Acta Radiol; 2020 Jun; 61(6):848-855. PubMed ID: 31615267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: differentiation of benign and malignant lymph nodes in different regions of the body.
Seber T; Caglar E; Uylar T; Karaman N; Aktas E; Aribas BK
Clin Imaging; 2015; 39(5):856-62. PubMed ID: 26091745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Node-by-node correlation between MR and PET/CT in patients with uterine cervical cancer: diffusion-weighted imaging versus size-based criteria on T2WI.
Choi EK; Kim JK; Choi HJ; Park SH; Park BW; Kim N; Kim JS; Im KC; Cho G; Cho KS
Eur Radiol; 2009 Aug; 19(8):2024-32. PubMed ID: 19277675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnosis of lymph node metastasis in uterine cervical cancer: usefulness of computer-aided diagnosis with comprehensive evaluation of MR images and clinical findings.
Kim MH; Kim JK; Lee Y; Park BW; Lee CK; Kim N; Cho G; Choi HJ; Cho KS
Acta Radiol; 2011 Dec; 52(10):1175-83. PubMed ID: 21969698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
