184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31153740)
1. Arthroscopic tenodesis using a bioabsorbable interference screw and soft anchor: A case series of 60 patients.
Sasaki Y; Ochiai N; Kenmoku T; Yamaguchi T; Kijima T; Hashimoto E; Ohtori S
J Orthop Sci; 2020 May; 25(3):410-415. PubMed ID: 31153740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis: a new technique using bioabsorbable interference screw fixation.
Boileau P; Krishnan SG; Coste JS; Walch G
Arthroscopy; 2002; 18(9):1002-12. PubMed ID: 12426544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Subpectoral tenodesis of the long head of the biceps tendon for pathologies of the long head of the biceps tendon and the biceps pulley].
Braun S; Minzlaff P; Imhoff AB
Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2012 Nov; 24(6):479-85. PubMed ID: 22805714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical evaluation of open suture anchor fixation versus interference screw for biceps tenodesis.
Papp DF; Skelley NW; Sutter EG; Ji JH; Wierks CH; Belkoff SM; McFarland EG
Orthopedics; 2011 Jul; 34(7):e275-8. PubMed ID: 21717988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing the Interference Screw and Suture Anchor Techniques for Biceps Tenodesis.
Park JS; Kim SH; Jung HJ; Lee YH; Oh JH
Am J Sports Med; 2017 Feb; 45(2):440-448. PubMed ID: 28146397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Arthroscopic extra-articular suprapectoral biceps tenodesis with knotless suture anchor.
Kongmalai P
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2019 Feb; 29(2):493-497. PubMed ID: 30145670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Radiostereometric Analysis of Tendon Migration After Arthroscopic and Mini-Open Biceps Tenodesis: Interference Screw Versus Single Suture Anchor Fixation.
Forsythe B; Patel HH; Berlinberg EJ; Forlenza EM; Okoroha KR; Williams BT; Yanke AB; Cole BJ; Verma NN
Am J Sports Med; 2023 Sep; 51(11):2869-2880. PubMed ID: 37548005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical and radiologic results of arthroscopic biceps tenodesis with suture anchor in the setting of rotator cuff tear.
Lee HI; Shon MS; Koh KH; Lim TK; Heo J; Yoo JC
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2014 Mar; 23(3):e53-60. PubMed ID: 24021158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interference screw vs. suture anchor fixation for open subpectoral biceps tenodesis: does it matter?
Millett PJ; Sanders B; Gobezie R; Braun S; Warner JJ
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2008 Sep; 9():121. PubMed ID: 18793424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical Evaluation of a Transtendinous All-Suture Anchor Technique Versus Interference Screw Technique for Suprapectoral Biceps Tenodesis in a Cadaveric Model.
Hong CK; Hsu KL; Kuan FC; Lin CL; Yeh ML; Su WR
Arthroscopy; 2018 Jun; 34(6):1755-1761. PubMed ID: 29482858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Arthroscopic knotless suprapectoral tenodesis of the long head of biceps: clinical and structural results.
Kerschbaum M; Scheuermann M; Gerhardt C; Scheibel M
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2016 Aug; 136(8):1135-42. PubMed ID: 27139186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical comparison of two techniques for arthroscopic suprapectoral biceps tenodesis: interference screw versus implant-free intraosseous tendon fixation.
Sampatacos N; Getelman MH; Henninger HB
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2014 Nov; 23(11):1731-9. PubMed ID: 24810080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Suprapectoral biceps tenodesis: a biomechanical comparison of a new "soft anchor" tenodesis technique versus interference screw biceps tendon fixation.
Baleani M; Francesconi D; Zani L; Giannini S; Snyder SJ
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2015 Feb; 30(2):188-94. PubMed ID: 25533271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Proximal Biceps Tenodesis: An Anatomic Study and Comparison of the Accuracy of Arthroscopic and Open Techniques Using Interference Screws.
Kovack TJ; Idoine JD; Jacob PB
Orthop J Sports Med; 2014 Feb; 2(2):2325967114522198. PubMed ID: 26535300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biceps Tenodesis: Biomechanical Assessment of 3 Arthroscopic Suprapectoral Techniques.
Vestermark G; Hartigan D; Piasecki D; Fleischli J; Odum SM; Zheng N; D'Alessandro DF
Orthopedics; 2017 Nov; 40(6):e1009-e1016. PubMed ID: 28968479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long head biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis: a cadaveric biomechanical analysis.
Wolf RS; Zheng N; Weichel D
Arthroscopy; 2005 Feb; 21(2):182-5. PubMed ID: 15689867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical evaluation of subpectoral biceps tenodesis: dual suture anchor versus interference screw fixation.
Tashjian RZ; Henninger HB
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2013 Oct; 22(10):1408-12. PubMed ID: 23415819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical Comparison of All-Suture Anchor Fixation and Interference Screw Technique for Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis.
Chiang FL; Hong CK; Chang CH; Lin CL; Jou IM; Su WR
Arthroscopy; 2016 Jul; 32(7):1247-52. PubMed ID: 27039966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Double on-lay fixation using all suture-type anchor for subpectoral biceps tenodesis has favorable functional outcomes and leads to less cosmetic deformities than single on-lay fixation.
Rhee SM; Jeong HY; Ro K; Pancholi S; Rhee YG
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2019 Dec; 27(12):4005-4013. PubMed ID: 31410527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Arthroscopic soft tissue tenodesis versus bony fixation anchor tenodesis of the long head of the biceps tendon.
Scheibel M; Schröder RJ; Chen J; Bartsch M
Am J Sports Med; 2011 May; 39(5):1046-52. PubMed ID: 21257843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
