These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31154095)

  • 1. Single-port versus multi-port robotic sacrocervicopexy: Establishment of a learning curve and short-term outcomes.
    Lauterbach R; Mustafa-Mikhail S; Matanes E; Amit A; Wiener Z; Lowenstein L
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Aug; 239():1-6. PubMed ID: 31154095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. First report comparing the two types of single-incision robotic sacrocolpopexy: Single site using the da Vinci Xi or Si system and single port using the da Vinci SP system.
    Lee SR; Roh AM; Jeong K; Kim SH; Chae HD; Moon HS
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jan; 60(1):60-65. PubMed ID: 33495010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site compared with robotic multi-port sacrocolpopexy for apical compartment prolapse.
    Matanes E; Boulus S; Lauterbach R; Amit A; Weiner Z; Lowenstein L
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 222(4):358.e1-358.e11. PubMed ID: 31589864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Single-port robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with magnetic retraction: first experience using the SP da Vinci platform.
    Ganesan V; Goueli R; Rodriguez D; Hess D; Carmel M
    J Robot Surg; 2020 Oct; 14(5):753-758. PubMed ID: 32036495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Implementation of a new procedure: laparoscopic versus robotic sacrocolpopexy.
    Awad N; Mustafa S; Amit A; Deutsch M; Eldor-Itskovitz J; Lowenstein L
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Jun; 287(6):1181-6. PubMed ID: 23274792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Laparoscopic and robotic sacropexy: retrospective review of learning curve experiences and follow-up.
    Pilka R; Gágyor D; Študentová M; Neubert D; Dzvinčuk P
    Ceska Gynekol; 2017; 82(4):261-267. PubMed ID: 28925269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Single Port Robotic Assisted Sacrocolpopexy: Our Experience With the First 25 Cases.
    Matanes E; Lauterbach R; Mustafa-Mikhail S; Amit A; Wiener Z; Lowenstein L
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2017; 23(3):e14-e18. PubMed ID: 28134702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perioperative outcomes after robotic versus vaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.
    Nguyen JN; Yang ST
    J Robot Surg; 2020 Jun; 14(3):415-421. PubMed ID: 31332703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robotic Sacrocolpopexy-Is It the Treatment of Choice for Advanced Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse?
    Oliver JL; Kim JH
    Curr Urol Rep; 2017 Sep; 18(9):66. PubMed ID: 28718162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Short-term outcomes of single port robotic hysterectomy with concomitant sacrocolpopexy.
    Ashmore S; Kenton K; Collins S; Geynisman-Tan J; Lewicky-Gaupp C; Mueller MG
    J Robot Surg; 2024 Jun; 18(1):260. PubMed ID: 38904835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy/sacrocervicopexy repair of pelvic organ prolapse: initial experience.
    Göçmen A; Sanlıkan F; Uçar MG
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Mar; 285(3):683-8. PubMed ID: 21818575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perioperative adverse events after minimally invasive abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
    Unger CA; Paraiso MF; Jelovsek JE; Barber MD; Ridgeway B
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Nov; 211(5):547.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robotic pelvic organ prolapse surgery.
    Sajadi KP; Goldman HB
    Nat Rev Urol; 2015 Apr; 12(4):216-24. PubMed ID: 25800401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Surgical cost of robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: a comparison of two robotic platforms.
    Glass Clark S; Shepherd JP; Sassani JC; Bonidie M
    Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Jan; 34(1):87-91. PubMed ID: 36282303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Minimally invasive apical sacropexy: a retrospective review of laparoscopic and robotic operating room experiences.
    Pulliam SJ; Weinstein MM; Wakamatsu MM
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2012; 18(2):122-6. PubMed ID: 22453324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Learning curves and perioperative outcomes of single-incision robotic sacrocolpopexy on two different da Vinci
    Oh S; Bae N; Cho HW; Park YJ; Kim YJ; Shin JH
    J Robot Surg; 2023 Aug; 17(4):1457-1462. PubMed ID: 36757563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Robotic-assisted surgery in urogynecology--our experience with the first 100 cases: experience from a single institution].
    Mustafa S; Mustafa M; Burke Y; Nibal AK; Deutsch M; Deutsch M; Lowenstein L
    Harefuah; 2014 Aug; 153(8):448-52, 499. PubMed ID: 25286633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of Robotic Procedural Times Using Colpassist Versus End-to-End Anastomosis Sizer for Robotic-Assisted Sacrocolpopexy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Brueseke T; Matthews C; Willis-Gray M; Knight S; Nieto ML; Geller E
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019; 25(2):e12-e17. PubMed ID: 30807429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Symptom Relief and Retreatment After Vaginal, Open, or Robotic Surgery for Apical Vaginal Prolapse.
    Anand M; Weaver AL; Fruth KM; Trabuco EC; Gebhart JB
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2017; 23(5):297-309. PubMed ID: 28118173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ultrasonography and robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocervicopexy with pubocervical fascia reconstruction: comparison with standard technique.
    Davila HH; Abdelhameed S; Malave-Huertas D; Bigay FF; Crawford K; Friedenstab A; Lum K; Bruce L; Goodman L; Gallo T
    J Robot Surg; 2020 Oct; 14(5):759-766. PubMed ID: 32062812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.