These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31154164)

  • 1. The effect of envelope modulations on binaural processing.
    Goupell MJ; Fong S; Stakhovskaya O
    Hear Res; 2019 Aug; 379():117-127. PubMed ID: 31154164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improved interaural timing of acoustic nerve stimulation affects sound localization in single-sided deaf cochlear implant users.
    Seebacher J; Franke-Trieger A; Weichbold V; Zorowka P; Stephan K
    Hear Res; 2019 Jan; 371():19-27. PubMed ID: 30439571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Auditory cortex responses to interaural time differences in the envelope of low-frequency sound, recorded with MEG in young and older listeners.
    Ross B
    Hear Res; 2018 Dec; 370():22-39. PubMed ID: 30265860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Effect of Simulated Interaural Frequency Mismatch on Speech Understanding and Spatial Release From Masking.
    Goupell MJ; Stoelb CA; Kan A; Litovsky RY
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):895-905. PubMed ID: 29337763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Binaural unmasking with temporal envelope and fine structure in listeners with cochlear implants.
    Todd AE; Goupell MJ; Litovsky RY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 May; 145(5):2982. PubMed ID: 31153315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rate dependent neural responses of interaural-time-difference cues in fine-structure and envelope.
    Hu H; Ewert SD; Kollmeier B; Vickers D
    PeerJ; 2024; 12():e17104. PubMed ID: 38680894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sensitivity to interaural envelope correlation changes in bilateral cochlear-implant users.
    Goupell MJ; Litovsky RY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jan; 137(1):335-49. PubMed ID: 25618064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neural Processing of Acoustic and Electric Interaural Time Differences in Normal-Hearing Gerbils.
    Vollmer M
    J Neurosci; 2018 Aug; 38(31):6949-6966. PubMed ID: 29959238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Cochlear Implant Users With and Without Access to Low-Frequency Acoustic Hearing.
    Williges B; Dietz M; Hohmann V; Jürgens T
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sound-direction identification, interaural time delay discrimination, and speech intelligibility advantages in noise for a bilateral cochlear implant user.
    Van Hoesel R; Ramsden R; Odriscoll M
    Ear Hear; 2002 Apr; 23(2):137-49. PubMed ID: 11951849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bilateral cochlear implants in children: binaural unmasking.
    Van Deun L; van Wieringen A; Francart T; Scherf F; Dhooge IJ; Deggouj N; Desloovere C; Van de Heyning PH; Offeciers FE; De Raeve L; Wouters J
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14(4):240-7. PubMed ID: 19141992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pre- and Postoperative Binaural Unmasking for Bimodal Cochlear Implant Listeners.
    Sheffield BM; Schuchman G; Bernstein JGW
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):554-567. PubMed ID: 28301390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sensitivity to interaural level and envelope time differences of two bilateral cochlear implant listeners using clinical sound processors.
    Laback B; Pok SM; Baumgartner WD; Deutsch WA; Schmid K
    Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):488-500. PubMed ID: 15599195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Binaural Pitch Fusion in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users.
    Reiss LAJ; Fowler JR; Hartling CL; Oh Y
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):390-397. PubMed ID: 28945657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Role of Binaural Temporal Fine Structure and Envelope Cues in Cocktail-Party Listening.
    Swaminathan J; Mason CR; Streeter TM; Best V; Roverud E; Kidd G
    J Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 36(31):8250-7. PubMed ID: 27488643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interaural envelope correlation change discrimination in bilateral cochlear implantees: effects of mismatch, centering, and onset of deafness.
    Goupell MJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Mar; 137(3):1282-97. PubMed ID: 25786942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies III: Speech Intelligibility of Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
    Völker C; Warzybok A; Ernst SM
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results.
    Laszig R; Aschendorff A; Stecker M; Müller-Deile J; Maune S; Dillier N; Weber B; Hey M; Begall K; Lenarz T; Battmer RD; Böhm M; Steffens T; Strutz J; Linder T; Probst R; Allum J; Westhofen M; Doering W
    Otol Neurotol; 2004 Nov; 25(6):958-68. PubMed ID: 15547426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Coding of temporally fluctuating interaural timing disparities in a binaural processing model based on phase differences.
    Dietz M; Ewert SD; Hohmann V; Kollmeier B
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1220():234-45. PubMed ID: 17949695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of audiovisual and binaural listening on the acceptable noise level (ANL): establishing an ANL conceptual model.
    Wu YH; Stangl E; Pang C; Zhang X
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Feb; 25(2):141-53. PubMed ID: 24828215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.