These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31154671)

  • 41. Is Canada Moving towards a More Agile Regulatory Approval and Reimbursement Process with a Shifting Role for Real-World Evidence (RWE) for Oncology Drugs?
    Lau CY; Rawson NSB
    Curr Oncol; 2024 Sep; 31(9):5599-5607. PubMed ID: 39330042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Estimated effects of adding universal public coverage of an essential medicines list to existing public drug plans in Canada.
    Morgan SG; Li W; Yau B; Persaud N
    CMAJ; 2017 Feb; 189(8):E295-E302. PubMed ID: 28246223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Impact of Oncology Drug Review Times on Public Funding Recommendations.
    Hussain M; Wong C; Taguedong E; Verma S; Mahsin M; Karim S; Lee-Ying R; Ezeife DA
    Curr Oncol; 2023 Aug; 30(8):7706-7712. PubMed ID: 37623039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The High Cost of Prescription Drugs in the United States: Origins and Prospects for Reform.
    Kesselheim AS; Avorn J; Sarpatwari A
    JAMA; 2016 Aug 23-30; 316(8):858-71. PubMed ID: 27552619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The promise of e-health--a Canadian perspective.
    Alvarez RC
    World Hosp Health Serv; 2004; 40(4):31-5. PubMed ID: 15751551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Public perspectives on disinvestments in drug funding: results from a Canadian deliberative public engagement event on cancer drugs.
    Costa S; Bentley C; Regier DA; McTaggart-Cowan H; Mitton C; Burgess MM; Peacock SJ
    BMC Public Health; 2019 Jul; 19(1):977. PubMed ID: 31331312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The development of a value based pricing index for new drugs in metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Dranitsaris G; Truter I; Lubbe MS
    Eur J Cancer; 2011 Jun; 47(9):1299-304. PubMed ID: 21493060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Is there an economic rationale for cancer drugs to have a separate reimbursement review process for resource allocation purposes?
    McDonald H; Charles C; Elit L; Gafni A
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2015 Mar; 33(3):235-41. PubMed ID: 25424496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Pan-Canadian Pharmaceutical Alliance (pCPA): Timelines Analysis and Policy Implications.
    Salek SM; Lussier Hoskyn S; Johns J; Allen N; Sehgal C
    Front Pharmacol; 2018; 9():1578. PubMed ID: 30833899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Do the American Society of Clinical Oncology Value Framework and the European Society of Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale Measure the Same Construct of Clinical Benefit?
    Cheng S; McDonald EJ; Cheung MC; Arciero VS; Qureshi M; Jiang D; Ezeife D; Sabharwal M; Chambers A; Han D; Leighl N; Sabarre KA; Chan KKW
    J Clin Oncol; 2017 Aug; 35(24):2764-2771. PubMed ID: 28574778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The prioritization preferences of pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review members and the Canadian public: a stated-preferences comparison.
    Skedgel C
    Curr Oncol; 2016 Oct; 23(5):322-328. PubMed ID: 27803596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Health technology assessment and price negotiation alignment for rare disorder drugs in Canada: Who benefits?
    Rawson NSB
    Orphanet J Rare Dis; 2022 Jun; 17(1):218. PubMed ID: 35698235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. What can the Canadians and Americans learn from each other's health care systems?
    Weil TP
    Int J Health Plann Manage; 2016 Jul; 31(3):349-70. PubMed ID: 27469581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Attitude of Iranian Medical Oncologists Toward Economic Aspects, and Policy-making in Relation to New Cancer Drugs.
    Daroudi R; Mirzania M; Zendehdel K
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2015 Oct; 5(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 26927395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Impact of rarity on Canadian oncology health technology assessment and funding.
    Keech J; Dai WF; Trudeau M; Mercer RE; Naipaul R; Wright FC; Ferguson SE; Darling G; Gavura S; Eisen A; Kouroukis CT; Beca J; Chan KKW
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2020 Aug; ():1-6. PubMed ID: 32779560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Rising Cost of Cancer Pharmaceuticals: Cost Issues and Interventions to Control Costs.
    Glode AE; May MB
    Pharmacotherapy; 2017 Jan; 37(1):85-93. PubMed ID: 27862122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Reimbursement recommendations for cancer drugs supported by phase II evidence in Canada.
    Li YYR; Mai H; Trudeau ME; Mittmann N; Chiasson K; Chan KKW; Cheung MC
    Curr Oncol; 2020 Oct; 27(5):e495-e500. PubMed ID: 33173389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Value-Based Calculators in Cancer: Current State and Challenges.
    Nabhan C; Feinberg BA
    J Oncol Pract; 2017 Aug; 13(8):499-506. PubMed ID: 28617618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Pan-Canadian review of cancer drugs will not be binding on provinces.
    Vogel L
    CMAJ; 2010 Jun; 182(9):887-8. PubMed ID: 20479048
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. How do cost-effectiveness analyses inform reimbursement decisions for oncology medicines in Canada? The example of sunitinib for first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
    Chabot I; Rocchi A
    Value Health; 2010; 13(6):837-45. PubMed ID: 20561332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.