These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31154699)

  • 1. Responsiveness of Commonly Used Patient- Reported Outcome Instruments in Lumbar Microdiscectomy.
    Vishwanathan K; Braithwaite I
    Asian Spine J; 2019 Oct; 13(5):753-762. PubMed ID: 31154699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Construct validity and responsiveness of commonly used patient reported outcome instruments in decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Vishwanathan K; Braithwaite I
    J Clin Orthop Trauma; 2021 May; 16():125-131. PubMed ID: 33717946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accurately measuring the quality and effectiveness of cervical spine surgery in registry efforts: determining the most valid and responsive instruments.
    Godil SS; Parker SL; Zuckerman SL; Mendenhall SK; McGirt MJ
    Spine J; 2015 Jun; 15(6):1203-9. PubMed ID: 24076442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison between the low back pain scales for patients with lumbar disc herniation: validity, reliability, and responsiveness.
    Yao M; Xu BP; Li ZJ; Zhu S; Tian ZR; Li DH; Cen J; Cheng SD; Wang YJ; Guo YM; Cui XJ
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2020 Jun; 18(1):175. PubMed ID: 32522196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Correlations Between the SF-36, the Oswestry-Disability Index and Rolland-Morris Disability Questionnaire in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Decompression According to Types of Spine Origin Pain.
    Ko S; Chae S
    Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Jul; 30(6):E804-E808. PubMed ID: 27662270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accurately measuring the quality and effectiveness of lumbar surgery in registry efforts: determining the most valid and responsive instruments.
    Godil SS; Parker SL; Zuckerman SL; Mendenhall SK; Glassman SD; McGirt MJ
    Spine J; 2014 Dec; 14(12):2885-91. PubMed ID: 24768731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Responsiveness of the Oswestry Disability Index and the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire in Italian subjects with sub-acute and chronic low back pain.
    Monticone M; Baiardi P; Vanti C; Ferrari S; Pillastrini P; Mugnai R; Foti C
    Eur Spine J; 2012 Jan; 21(1):122-9. PubMed ID: 21823035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Determination of minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after extension of fusion for adjacent-segment disease.
    Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau D; Adogwa O; Cheng JS; Anderson WN; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jan; 16(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 21962034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of the minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: clinical article.
    Parker SL; Godil SS; Shau DN; Mendenhall SK; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Feb; 18(2):154-60. PubMed ID: 23176164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficacy of intraoperative epidural triamcinolone application in lumbar microdiscectomy: a matched-control study.
    Stienen MN; Joswig H; Chau I; Neidert MC; Bellut D; Wälchli T; Schaller K; Gautschi OP
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Mar; 28(3):291-299. PubMed ID: 29243999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Usefulness of preoperative Short Form-36 Mental Component Score as a prognostic factor in patients who underwent decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Ko S; Choi W
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Sep; 101(39):e30231. PubMed ID: 36181126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Are preoperative health-related quality of life scores predictive of clinical outcomes after lumbar fusion?
    Carreon LY; Glassman SD; Djurasovic M; Dimar JR; Johnson JR; Puno RM; Campbell MJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Apr; 34(7):725-30. PubMed ID: 19333106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.
    Haro H; Maekawa S; Hamada Y
    Spine J; 2008; 8(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 17433781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Are the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire and Oswestry Disability Index interchangeable in patients after lumbar spinal fusion?
    Kersten RFMR; Fikkers J; Wolterbeek N; Öner FC; van Gaalen SM
    J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 2021; 34(4):605-611. PubMed ID: 33646141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Importance of patient-reported individualized goals when assessing outcomes for adult spinal deformity (ASD): initial experience with a Patient Generated Index (PGI).
    Scheer JK; Keefe M; Lafage V; Kelly MP; Bess S; Burton DC; Hart RA; Jain A; Lonner BS; Protopsaltis TS; Hostin R; Shaffrey CI; Smith JS; Schwab F; Ames CP
    Spine J; 2017 Oct; 17(10):1397-1405. PubMed ID: 28414170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Association of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score with the Oswestry Disability Index, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, and short-form 36.
    Fujiwara A; Kobayashi N; Saiki K; Kitagawa T; Tamai K; Saotome K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jul; 28(14):1601-7. PubMed ID: 12865852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Responsiveness of a patient specific outcome measure compared with the Oswestry Disability Index v2.1 and Roland and Morris Disability Questionnaire for patients with subacute and chronic low back pain.
    Frost H; Lamb SE; Stewart-Brown S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Oct; 33(22):2450-7; discussion 2458. PubMed ID: 18824951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The discriminative properties of the SF-6D compared with the SF-36 and ODI.
    Carreon LY; Berven SH; Djurasovic M; Bratcher KR; Glassman SD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jan; 38(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 22648033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Oswestry Disability Index, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, and Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale: Responsiveness and Minimal Clinically Important Changes in Iranian People with Lumbar Disc Herniation Following Physiotherapy.
    Ghaderi Niri H; Ghanavati T; Mostafaee N; Salahzadeh Z; Divandari A; Adigozali H; Ahadi J
    Arch Bone Jt Surg; 2024; 12(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 38318303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference for pain and disability instruments in low back pain patients.
    Lauridsen HH; Hartvigsen J; Manniche C; Korsholm L; Grunnet-Nilsson N
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2006 Oct; 7():82. PubMed ID: 17064410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.