These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31156279)
1. Cognitive Diagnostic Models With Attribute Hierarchies: Model Estimation With a Restricted Q-Matrix Design. Tu D; Wang S; Cai Y; Douglas J; Chang HH Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Jun; 43(4):255-271. PubMed ID: 31156279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Theorems and Methods of a Complete Q Matrix With Attribute Hierarchies Under Restricted Q-Matrix Design. Cai Y; Tu D; Ding S Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1413. PubMed ID: 30135672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Determining the Number of Attributes in Cognitive Diagnosis Modeling. Nájera P; Abad FJ; Sorrel MA Front Psychol; 2021; 12():614470. PubMed ID: 33658962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Impact of Q-Matrix Designs on Diagnostic Classification Accuracy in the Presence of Attribute Hierarchies. Liu R; Huggins-Manley AC; Bradshaw L Educ Psychol Meas; 2017 Apr; 77(2):220-240. PubMed ID: 29795911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Effects of Q-Matrix Design on Classification Accuracy in the Log-Linear Cognitive Diagnosis Model. Madison MJ; Bradshaw LP Educ Psychol Meas; 2015 Jun; 75(3):491-511. PubMed ID: 29795830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Learning Latent and Hierarchical Structures in Cognitive Diagnosis Models. Ma C; Ouyang J; Xu G Psychometrika; 2023 Mar; 88(1):175-207. PubMed ID: 35596101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hierarchical diagnostic classification models: a family of models for estimating and testing attribute hierarchies. Templin J; Bradshaw L Psychometrika; 2014 Apr; 79(2):317-39. PubMed ID: 24478021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improving Robustness in Q-Matrix Validation Using an Iterative and Dynamic Procedure. Nájera P; Sorrel MA; de la Torre J; Abad FJ Appl Psychol Meas; 2020 Sep; 44(6):431-446. PubMed ID: 32788815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Two-Stage maximum likelihood estimation in the misspecified restricted latent class model. Wang S Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 May; 71(2):300-333. PubMed ID: 29080215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Complete Q-matrices in conjunctive models on general attribute structures. Heller J Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2022 Nov; 75(3):522-549. PubMed ID: 35307821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance of Fit Indices in Choosing Correct Cognitive Diagnostic Models and Q-Matrices. Lei PW; Li H Appl Psychol Meas; 2016 Sep; 40(6):405-417. PubMed ID: 29881062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. On the Sequential Hierarchical Cognitive Diagnostic Model. Zhang X; Wang J Front Psychol; 2020; 11():579018. PubMed ID: 33117245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An Empirical Q-Matrix Validation Method for the Polytomous G-DINA Model. de la Torre J; Qiu XL; Santos KC Psychometrika; 2022 Jun; 87(2):693-724. PubMed ID: 34843060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Q-Matrix Designs of Longitudinal Diagnostic Classification Models With Hierarchical Attributes for Formative Assessment. Tian W; Zhang J; Peng Q; Yang X Front Psychol; 2020; 11():1694. PubMed ID: 32903650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Using the iterative latent-class analysis approach to improve attribute accuracy in diagnostic classification models. Jiang Z Behav Res Methods; 2019 Jun; 51(3):1075-1084. PubMed ID: 30843156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An exploratory Q-matrix estimation method based on sparse non-negative matrix factorization. Xiong J; Luo Z; Luo G; Yu X; Li Y Behav Res Methods; 2024 Oct; 56(7):7647-7673. PubMed ID: 39060862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Learning Large Q-Matrix by Restricted Boltzmann Machines. Li C; Ma C; Xu G Psychometrika; 2022 Sep; 87(3):1010-1041. PubMed ID: 35089496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimation approaches in cognitive diagnosis modeling when attributes are hierarchically structured. Akbay L; de la Torre J Psicothema; 2020 Feb; 32(1):122-129. PubMed ID: 31954425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. New Paradigm of Identifiable General-response Cognitive Diagnostic Models: Beyond Categorical Data. Lee S; Gu Y Psychometrika; 2024 Dec; 89(4):1304-1336. PubMed ID: 38967857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]