These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31157537)

  • 1. Age-related differences in evaluation of social attributes from computer-generated faces of varying intensity.
    Cortes DS; Laukka P; Ebner NC; Fischer H
    Psychol Aging; 2019 Aug; 34(5):686-697. PubMed ID: 31157537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perceptual and Social Attributes Underlining Age-Related Preferences for Faces.
    Kiiski HS; Cullen B; Clavin SL; Newell FN
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2016; 10():437. PubMed ID: 27630553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contributions of shape and reflectance information to social judgments from faces.
    Oh D; Dotsch R; Todorov A
    Vision Res; 2019 Dec; 165():131-142. PubMed ID: 31734634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Face likeability mediates the memory-enhancing effect of face attractiveness in young but not older adults.
    Lin T; Lendry R; Ebner NC
    Memory; 2016 Nov; 24(10):1396-406. PubMed ID: 26619961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. CHILDREN'S AND ADULTS' JUDGMENTS OF FACIAL TRUSTWORTHINESS: THE RELATIONSHIP TO FACIAL ATTRACTIVENESS.
    Ma F; Xu F; Luo X
    Percept Mot Skills; 2015 Aug; 121(1):179-98. PubMed ID: 26108060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The attractiveness halo effect and the babyface stereotype in older and younger adults: similarities, own-age accentuation, and older adult positivity effects.
    Zebrowitz LA; Franklin RG
    Exp Aging Res; 2014; 40(3):375-93. PubMed ID: 24785596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Older Adult Positivity Effect in Evaluations of Trustworthiness: Emotion Regulation or Cognitive Capacity?
    Zebrowitz LA; Boshyan J; Ward N; Gutchess A; Hadjikhani N
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0169823. PubMed ID: 28060919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Individual differences in perceptual sensitivity and representation of facial signals of trustworthiness.
    Baccolo E; Macchi Cassia V
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Feb; 45(2):224-236. PubMed ID: 30589353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Facial movements strategically camouflage involuntary social signals of face morphology.
    Gill D; Garrod OG; Jack RE; Schyns PG
    Psychol Sci; 2014 May; 25(5):1079-86. PubMed ID: 24659191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of data-driven computational models of social perception of faces.
    Todorov A; Dotsch R; Porter JM; Oosterhof NN; Falvello VB
    Emotion; 2013 Aug; 13(4):724-38. PubMed ID: 23627724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Let me guess how old you are: effects of age, gender, and facial expression on perceptions of age.
    Voelkle MC; Ebner NC; Lindenberger U; Riediger M
    Psychol Aging; 2012 Jun; 27(2):265-77. PubMed ID: 21895379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Memory for reputational trait information: is social-emotional information processing less flexible in old age?
    Bell R; Giang T; Mund I; Buchner A
    Psychol Aging; 2013 Dec; 28(4):984-995. PubMed ID: 24364403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Judging Normality and Attractiveness in Faces: Direct Evidence of a More Refined Representation for Own-Race, Young Adult Faces.
    Zhou X; Short LA; Chan HS; Mondloch CJ
    Perception; 2016 Sep; 45(9):973-90. PubMed ID: 27335127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Gender biases in impressions from faces: Empirical studies and computational models.
    Oh D; Dotsch R; Porter J; Todorov A
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Feb; 149(2):323-342. PubMed ID: 31294585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Oxytocin does not make a face appear more trustworthy but improves the accuracy of trustworthiness judgments.
    Lambert B; Declerck CH; Boone C
    Psychoneuroendocrinology; 2014 Feb; 40():60-8. PubMed ID: 24485476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Age of face matters: age-group differences in ratings of young and old faces.
    Ebner NC
    Behav Res Methods; 2008 Feb; 40(1):130-6. PubMed ID: 18411535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Age and Gender Differences in Facial Attractiveness, but Not Emotion Resemblance, Contribute to Age and Gender Stereotypes.
    Palumbo R; Adams RB; Hess U; Kleck RE; Zebrowitz L
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1704. PubMed ID: 29033881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impressions of dominance are made relative to others in the visual environment.
    Re DE; Lefevre CE; DeBruine LM; Jones BC; Perrett DI
    Evol Psychol; 2014 Mar; 12(1):251-63. PubMed ID: 25299763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Judging trustworthiness from faces: Emotion cues modulate trustworthiness judgments in young children.
    Caulfield F; Ewing L; Bank S; Rhodes G
    Br J Psychol; 2016 Aug; 107(3):503-18. PubMed ID: 26493772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Personality in perspective: judgmental consistency across orientations of the face.
    Rule NO; Ambady N; Adams RB
    Perception; 2009; 38(11):1688-99. PubMed ID: 20120266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.