These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

444 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31157994)

  • 1. Aortic Stenosis and Small Aortic Annulus.
    Freitas-Ferraz AB; Tirado-Conte G; Dagenais F; Ruel M; Al-Atassi T; Dumont E; Mohammadi S; Bernier M; Pibarot P; Rodés-Cabau J
    Circulation; 2019 Jun; 139(23):2685-2702. PubMed ID: 31157994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sutureless versus transcatheter aortic valves in elderly patients with aortic stenosis at intermediate risk: A multi-institutional study.
    Muneretto C; Solinas M; Folliguet T; Di Bartolomeo R; Repossini A; Laborde F; Rambaldini M; Santarpino G; Di Bacco L; Fischlein T
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2022 Mar; 163(3):925-935.e5. PubMed ID: 32727681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sutureless versus Stented Bioprostheses for Aortic Valve Replacement: The Randomized PERSIST-AVR Study Design.
    Lorusso R; Folliguet T; Shrestha M; Meuris B; Kappetein AP; Roselli E; Klersy C; Nozza M; Verhees L; Larracas C; Goisis G; Fischlein T
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2020 Mar; 68(2):114-123. PubMed ID: 30497085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sutureless Perceval Aortic Valve Versus Conventional Stented Bioprostheses: Meta-Analysis of Postoperative and Midterm Results in Isolated Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Meco M; Montisci A; Miceli A; Panisi P; Donatelli F; Cirri S; Ferrarini M; Lio A; Glauber M
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2018 Feb; 7(4):. PubMed ID: 29453309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement in failed stentless versus stented surgical bioprosthetic aortic valves.
    Choi CH; Cheng V; Malaver D; Kon N; Kincaid EH; Gandhi SK; Applegate RJ; Zhao DXM
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 May; 93(6):1106-1115. PubMed ID: 30588736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Aortic Valve Replacement: Are We Spoiled for Choice?
    Bashir M; Harky A; Bleetman D; Adams B; Roberts N; Balmforth D; Yap J; Lall K; Shipolini A; Oo A; Uppal R
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2017 Autumn; 29(3):265-272. PubMed ID: 28935509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Durability and Clinical Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Failed Surgical Bioprostheses.
    Dauerman HL; Deeb GM; O'Hair DP; Waksman R; Yakubov SJ; Kleiman NS; Chetcuti SJ; Hermiller JB; Bajwa T; Khabbaz K; de Marchena E; Salerno T; Dries-Devlin JL; Li S; Popma JJ; Reardon MJ
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Oct; 12(10):e008155. PubMed ID: 31607151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sutureless and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: When Rivals Become Allies.
    Ellouze M; Mazine A; Carrier M; Bouchard D
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2020 Autumn; 32(3):427-430. PubMed ID: 31330180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sutureless versus Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implant: A Propensity Score Matching Study.
    Santarpino G; Vogt F; Pfeiffer S; Dell'Aquila AM; Jessl J; Cuomo F; von Wardenburg C; Fischlein T; Pauschinger M; Schwab J
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2017 May; 26(3):255-261. PubMed ID: 29092108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sutureless versus conventional bioprostheses for aortic valve replacement in severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis.
    Fischlein T; Folliguet T; Meuris B; Shrestha ML; Roselli EE; McGlothlin A; Kappert U; Pfeiffer S; Corbi P; Lorusso R;
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2021 Mar; 161(3):920-932. PubMed ID: 33478837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficacy of sutureless aortic valves in minimally invasive cardiac surgery: an evolution of the surgical technique.
    Pfeiffer S; Dell'aquila AM; Vogt F; Kalisnik JM; Sirch J; Fischlein T; Santarpino G
    J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2017 Oct; 58(5):731-738. PubMed ID: 27385418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of small prosthesis size on transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement outcomes.
    Salna M; Khalique OK; Chiuzan C; Kurlansky P; Borger MA; Hahn RT; Leon MB; Smith CR; Kodali SK; George I
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Mar; 91(4):765-773. PubMed ID: 28470996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of Pre-Existing Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch on Survival Following Aortic Valve-in-Valve Procedures.
    Pibarot P; Simonato M; Barbanti M; Linke A; Kornowski R; Rudolph T; Spence M; Moat N; Aldea G; Mennuni M; Iadanza A; Amrane H; Gaia D; Kim WK; Napodano M; Baumbach H; Finkelstein A; Kobayashi J; Brecker S; Don C; Cerillo A; Unbehaun A; Attias D; Nejjari M; Jones N; Fiorina C; Tchetche D; Philippart R; Spargias K; Hernandez JM; Latib A; Dvir D
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jan; 11(2):133-141. PubMed ID: 29348008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sutureless Aortic Valves: Combining the Best or the Worst?
    Bedeir K; Reardon M; Cohn LH; Ramlawi B
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 Summer; 28(2):341-352. PubMed ID: 28043442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. TAVR for Failed Surgical Aortic Bioprostheses Using a Self-Expanding Device: 1-Year Results From the Prospective VIVA Postmarket Study.
    Tchétché D; Chevalier B; Holzhey D; Harnath A; Schäfer U; Teiger E; Manigold T; Modine T; Souteyrand G; Champagnac D; Oh JK; Li S; Verhoye JP; Kornowski R;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 May; 12(10):923-932. PubMed ID: 31122349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transcatheter Replacement of Failed Bioprosthetic Valves: Large Multicenter Assessment of the Effect of Implantation Depth on Hemodynamics After Aortic Valve-in-Valve.
    Simonato M; Webb J; Kornowski R; Vahanian A; Frerker C; Nissen H; Bleiziffer S; Duncan A; Rodés-Cabau J; Attizzani GF; Horlick E; Latib A; Bekeredjian R; Barbanti M; Lefevre T; Cerillo A; Hernández JM; Bruschi G; Spargias K; Iadanza A; Brecker S; Palma JH; Finkelstein A; Abdel-Wahab M; Lemos P; Petronio AS; Champagnac D; Sinning JM; Salizzoni S; Napodano M; Fiorina C; Marzocchi A; Leon M; Dvir D
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jun; 9(6):. PubMed ID: 27301396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Transcatheter aortic valve in valve implantation with bioprosthetic valve fracture.
    James TM; Stamou SC; Rothenberg M; Nores MA
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 May; 93(6):1170-1172. PubMed ID: 30790421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Minimally Invasive Endoscopic Aortic Valve Replacement: Operative Results.
    Cresce GD; Sella M; Hinna Danesi T; Favaro A; Salvador L
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2020 Autumn; 32(3):416-423. PubMed ID: 31972301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hemodynamic Comparison of Sutureless and Rapid-Deployment Valves with Conventional Bioprostheses.
    Gotzmann M; Wilbring M; Charitos E; Treede H; Silaschi M
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2020 Oct; 68(7):584-594. PubMed ID: 30900219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimizing hemodynamics of transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation in 19-mm surgical aortic prostheses.
    Patel JS; Krishnaswamy A; White J; Mick S; Navia J; Mehta A; Bakaeen F; Popovic Z; Svensson L; Kapadia SR
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Sep; 92(3):550-554. PubMed ID: 29226506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.