139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31158613)
1. Evaluation of the applicability of regression equations for sorting commingled remains on 3-Dimensional bony elements from CT scans.
De Simone S; Hackman LS
Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Aug; 301():160-165. PubMed ID: 31158613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Technical note: Development of regression equations to reassociate upper limb bones from commingled contexts.
Anastopoulou I; Karakostis FA; Eliopoulos C; Moraitis K
Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Oct; 315():110439. PubMed ID: 32823079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Osteometric sorting of skeletal elements from a sample of modern Colombians: a pilot study.
RodrÃguez JM; Hackman L; MartÃnez W; Medina CS
Int J Legal Med; 2016 Mar; 130(2):541-50. PubMed ID: 25588668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Reliable Regression-Based Approach for Reassociating Human Skeletal Elements of the Lower Limbs from Commingled Assemblages.
Anastopoulou I; Karakostis FA; Moraitis K
J Forensic Sci; 2019 Mar; 64(2):502-506. PubMed ID: 30102760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Virtual forensic anthropology: The accuracy of osteometric analysis of 3D bone models derived from clinical computed tomography (CT) scans.
Colman KL; de Boer HH; Dobbe JGG; Liberton NPTJ; Stull KE; van Eijnatten M; Streekstra GJ; Oostra RJ; van Rijn RR; van der Merwe AE
Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Nov; 304():109963. PubMed ID: 31610335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Osteometric sorting of commingled human remains.
Byrd JE; Adams BJ
J Forensic Sci; 2003 Jul; 48(4):717-24. PubMed ID: 12877285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three-Dimensional Geometry of Phalanges as a Proxy for Pair-Matching: Mesh Comparison Using an ICP Algorithm.
Tsiminikaki K; Karell MA; Nathena D; Halazonetis D; Spanakis K; Kranioti EF
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2019; 1205():55-69. PubMed ID: 31894569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Statistical Method for Reassociating Human Tali and Calcanei from a Commingled Context.
Anastopoulou I; Karakostis FA; Borrini M; Moraitis K
J Forensic Sci; 2018 Mar; 63(2):381-385. PubMed ID: 28568076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computerized reconstruction of fragmentary skeletal remains.
Mahfouz MR; Mustafa A; Abdel Fatah EE; Herrmann NP; Langley NR
Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Jun; 275():212-223. PubMed ID: 28411500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Virtual anthropology? Reliability of three-dimensional photogrammetry as a forensic anthropology measurement and documentation technique.
Omari R; Hunt C; Coumbaros J; Chapman B
Int J Legal Med; 2021 May; 135(3):939-950. PubMed ID: 33244707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Applicability of 3D-CT facial reconstruction for forensic individual identification.
Rocha Sdos S; Ramos DL; Cavalcanti Mde G
Pesqui Odontol Bras; 2003; 17(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 12908055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Osteometric reassociation of commingled human remains from a modern Greek sample using bone elements of the craniovertebral junction.
Louka V; Anastopoulou I; Moraitis K
Anthropol Anz; 2022 Aug; 79(4):399-409. PubMed ID: 35191462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Next-generation osteometric sorting: Using 3D shape, elliptical Fourier analysis, and Hausdorff distance to optimize osteological pair-matching.
Fancourt HSM; Lynch JJ; Byrd JE; Stephan CN
J Forensic Sci; 2021 May; 66(3):821-836. PubMed ID: 33550609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Advances in Osteometric Sorting: Utilizing Diaphyseal CSG Properties for Lower Limb Skeletal Pair-Matching.
Bertsatos A; Chovalopoulou ME
J Forensic Sci; 2020 Sep; 65(5):1400-1405. PubMed ID: 32569430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Open-Source Tools for Dense Facial Tissue Depth Mapping of Computed Tomography Models.
Simmons-Ehrhardt T; Falsetti C; Falsetti AB; Ehrhardt CJ
Hum Biol; 2018 Jan; 90(1):63-76. PubMed ID: 30387384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Automation of Regression Modeling in Osteometric Sorting: An Ordination Approach.
Lynch JJ
J Forensic Sci; 2018 May; 63(3):798-804. PubMed ID: 28731575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Power of Exclusion using Automated Osteometric Sorting: Pair-Matching.
Lynch JJ; Byrd J; LeGarde CB
J Forensic Sci; 2018 Mar; 63(2):371-380. PubMed ID: 28547802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Preliminary Investigation into the Accuracy of 3D Modeling and 3D Printing in Forensic Anthropology Evidence Reconstruction.
Carew RM; Morgan RM; Rando C
J Forensic Sci; 2019 Mar; 64(2):342-352. PubMed ID: 30296344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Standardized anthropological measurement of postcranial bones using three-dimensional models in CAD software.
Reynolds MS; MacGregor DM; Barry MD; Lottering N; Schmutz B; Wilson LJ; Meredith M; Gregory LS
Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Sep; 278():381-387. PubMed ID: 28810162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy and reliability of measurements obtained from computed tomography 3D volume rendered images.
Stull KE; Tise ML; Ali Z; Fowler DR
Forensic Sci Int; 2014 May; 238():133-40. PubMed ID: 24713466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]