These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

310 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31158737)

  • 21. Intensifying the intensity illusion in judgments of learning: Modality and cue combinations.
    Peynircioğlu ZF; Tatz JR
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Apr; 47(3):412-419. PubMed ID: 30411221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Metamemory for pictures of naturalistic scenes: Assessment of accuracy and cue utilization.
    Undorf M; Bröder A
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Oct; 49(7):1405-1422. PubMed ID: 33811297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. More than just beliefs: Experience and beliefs jointly contribute to volume effects on metacognitive judgments.
    Frank DJ; Kuhlmann BG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 May; 43(5):680-693. PubMed ID: 27709983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Slow judgments of learning predict familiarity-based memories as measured by the remember-know task.
    Jang Y
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Nov; 48(11):1618-1637. PubMed ID: 34516209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cue integration in metamemory judgements is strategic.
    Undorf M; Bröder A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Apr; 73(4):629-642. PubMed ID: 31561744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Explaining the forgetting bias effect on value judgments: The influence of memory for a past test.
    Rhodes MG; Witherby AE; Castel AD; Murayama K
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Apr; 45(3):362-374. PubMed ID: 27873187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparing electrophysiological correlates of judgment of learning and feeling of knowing during face-name recognition.
    Irak M; Soylu C; Turan G
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2019; 36(7-8):336-357. PubMed ID: 31928316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Judgments of Learning in Context: Backgrounds Can Both Reduce and Produce Metamemory Illusions.
    Tatz JR; Peynircioğlu ZF
    Mem Cognit; 2020 May; 48(4):581-595. PubMed ID: 31732926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Picture-perfect is not perfect for metamemory: Testing the perceptual fluency hypothesis with degraded images.
    Besken M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1417-33. PubMed ID: 26844578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Is retrieval the key? Metamemory judgment and testing as learning strategies.
    Akdoğan E; Izaute M; Danion JM; Vidailhet P; Bacon E
    Memory; 2016 Nov; 24(10):1390-5. PubMed ID: 26606714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The relatedness effect on judgments of learning: A closer look at the contribution of processing fluency.
    Undorf M; Erdfelder E
    Mem Cognit; 2015 May; 43(4):647-58. PubMed ID: 25388520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. How cognitive conflict affects judgments of learning: Evaluating the contributions of processing fluency and metamemory beliefs.
    Li X; Chen G; Yang C
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Jul; 49(5):912-922. PubMed ID: 33675000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Subjective experience guides betting decisions beyond accuracy: evidence from a metamemory illusion.
    Hembacher E; Ghetti S
    Memory; 2017 May; 25(5):575-585. PubMed ID: 27315009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Prospective and retrospective episodic metamemory in posttraumatic stress disorder.
    Sacher M; Tudorache AC; Clarys D; Boudjarane M; Landré L; El-Hage W
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2018 Nov; 40(9):865-873. PubMed ID: 29536791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. How influenceable is our metamemory for pictorial material? The impact of framing and emotionality on metamemory judgments.
    Schmoeger M; Deckert M; Loos E; Willinger U
    Cognition; 2020 Feb; 195():104112. PubMed ID: 31759319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The anchoring effect in metamemory monitoring.
    Yang C; Sun B; Shanks DR
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Apr; 46(3):384-397. PubMed ID: 29164524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Confidence ratings are better predictors of future performance than delayed judgments of learning.
    Putnam AL; Deng W; DeSoto KA
    Memory; 2022 May; 30(5):537-553. PubMed ID: 35037570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Judgments of learning index relative confidence, not subjective probability.
    Zawadzka K; Higham PA
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Nov; 43(8):1168-79. PubMed ID: 26111879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Do judgments of learning predict automatic influences of memory?
    Undorf M; Böhm S; Cüpper L
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jun; 42(6):882-96. PubMed ID: 26595068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Judgments of learning (JOLs) selectively improve memory depending on the type of test.
    Myers SJ; Rhodes MG; Hausman HE
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Jul; 48(5):745-758. PubMed ID: 32124334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.