These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31158843)

  • 1. Comparison of the INTERGROWTH-21st standard and a new reference for head circumference at birth among newborns in Southern China.
    Xiao WQ; Zhang LF; He JR; Shen SY; Funk AL; Lu JH; Wei XL; Yu J; Yang L; Li F; Xia HM; Qiu X
    Pediatr Res; 2019 Oct; 86(4):529-536. PubMed ID: 31158843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of updated birth weight, length and head circumference charts by gestational age in China with the INTERGROWTH-21st NCSS charts: a population-based study.
    Zhang YQ; Li H; Zong XN; Wu HH
    World J Pediatr; 2023 Jan; 19(1):96-105. PubMed ID: 36306051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. INTERGROWTH-21st vs customized birthweight standards for identification of perinatal mortality and morbidity.
    Anderson NH; Sadler LC; McKinlay CJD; McCowan LME
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Apr; 214(4):509.e1-509.e7. PubMed ID: 26546850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of US Birth Weight References and the International Fetal and Newborn Growth Consortium for the 21st Century Standard.
    Kozuki N; Katz J; Christian P; Lee AC; Liu L; Silveira MF; Barros F; Tielsch JM; Schmiegelow C; Sania A; Roberfroid D; Ndyomugyenyi R; Mullany LC; Mongkolchati A; Huybregts L; Humphrey J; Fawzi W; Baqui AH; Adair L; Oddo VM; Black RE;
    JAMA Pediatr; 2015 Jul; 169(7):e151438. PubMed ID: 26147059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Femur-sparing pattern of abnormal fetal growth in pregnant women from New York City after maternal Zika virus infection.
    Walker CL; Merriam AA; Ohuma EO; Dighe MK; Gale M; Rajagopal L; Papageorghiou AT; Gyamfi-Bannerman C; Adams Waldorf KM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Aug; 219(2):187.e1-187.e20. PubMed ID: 29738748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neonatal anthropometry at 3400 m above sea level compared with INTERGROWTH 21st standards
    Villamonte-Calanche W; Manrique-Corazao F; Jerí-Palomino M; De-La-Torre C; Roque-Roque JS; Wilson NA
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Jan; 30(2):155-158. PubMed ID: 26957192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of replacing Chinese ethnicity-specific fetal biometry charts with the INTERGROWTH-21(st) standard.
    Cheng Y; Leung TY; Lao T; Chan YM; Sahota DS
    BJOG; 2016 Sep; 123 Suppl 3():48-55. PubMed ID: 27627597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neonatal head circumference by gestation reflects adaptation to maternal body size: comparison of different standards.
    Morkuniene R; Tutkuviene J; Cole TJ; Jakimaviciene EM; Isakova J; Bankauskiene A; Drazdiene N; Basys V
    Sci Rep; 2022 Jun; 12(1):11057. PubMed ID: 35773453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prediction of microcephaly at birth using three reference ranges for fetal head circumference: can we improve prenatal diagnosis?
    Leibovitz Z; Daniel-Spiegel E; Malinger G; Haratz K; Tamarkin M; Gindes L; Schreiber L; Ben-Sira L; Lev D; Shapiro I; Bakry H; Weizman B; Zreik A; Egenburg S; Arad A; Tepper R; Kidron D; Lerman-Sagie T
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 May; 47(5):586-92. PubMed ID: 26511765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. International standards for newborn weight, length, and head circumference by gestational age and sex: the Newborn Cross-Sectional Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project.
    Villar J; Cheikh Ismail L; Victora CG; Ohuma EO; Bertino E; Altman DG; Lambert A; Papageorghiou AT; Carvalho M; Jaffer YA; Gravett MG; Purwar M; Frederick IO; Noble AJ; Pang R; Barros FC; Chumlea C; Bhutta ZA; Kennedy SH;
    Lancet; 2014 Sep; 384(9946):857-68. PubMed ID: 25209487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identification of the optimal growth charts for use in a preterm population: An Australian state-wide retrospective cohort study.
    Pritchard NL; Hiscock RJ; Lockie E; Permezel M; McGauren MFG; Kennedy AL; Green B; Walker SP; Lindquist AC
    PLoS Med; 2019 Oct; 16(10):e1002923. PubMed ID: 31584941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of INTERGROWTH-21 and Fenton growth standards to assess size at birth and extrauterine growth in very preterm infants.
    Tuzun F; Yucesoy E; Baysal B; Kumral A; Duman N; Ozkan H
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2018 Sep; 31(17):2252-2257. PubMed ID: 28587527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Comparison of UK Preterm Anthropometric Charts and INTERGROWTH-21st: Is It Time to Change Growth Charts?
    Bendor-Samuel OM; Zivanovic S; Odd D; Roehr CC
    Neonatology; 2020; 117(3):300-307. PubMed ID: 32396901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the INTERGROWTH-21st project newborn standard for use in Canada.
    Liu S; Metcalfe A; León JA; Sauve R; Kramer MS; Joseph KS;
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0172910. PubMed ID: 28257473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Application of the INTERGROWTH-21st chart compared to customized growth charts in fetuses with left heart obstruction: late trimester biometry, cerebroplacental hemodynamics and perinatal outcome.
    Graupner O; Helfrich F; Ostermayer E; Lobmaier SM; Ortiz JU; Ewert P; Wacker-Gussmann A; Haller B; Axt-Fliedner R; Enzensberger C; Abel K; Karge A; Oberhoffer R; Kuschel B
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2019 Sep; 300(3):601-613. PubMed ID: 31139902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Determination of birth-weight centile thresholds associated with adverse perinatal outcomes using population, customised, and Intergrowth charts: A Swedish population-based cohort study.
    Vieira MC; Relph S; Persson M; Seed PT; Pasupathy D
    PLoS Med; 2019 Sep; 16(9):e1002902. PubMed ID: 31539391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Serial head circumference measurements should be used to classify congenital microcephaly.
    Sengasai C; Chokephaibulkit K; Plipat N; Wongsiridej P
    BMC Pediatr; 2023 Sep; 23(1):490. PubMed ID: 37759153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measurement of Head Circumference: Implications for Microcephaly Surveillance in Zika-Affected Areas.
    Harville EW; Tong VT; Gilboa SM; Moore CA; Cafferata ML; Alger J; Gibbons L; Bustillo C; Callejas A; Castillo M; Fúnes J; García J; Hernández G; López W; Ochoa C; Rico F; Rodríguez H; Zúniga C; Ciganda A; Stella C; Tomasso G; Buekens P
    Trop Med Infect Dis; 2020 Dec; 6(1):. PubMed ID: 33383742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of birth weight, length, and head circumference between the BRISA-RP and Intergrowth-21st cohorts.
    Pimenta JRR; Grandi C; Aragon DC; Cardoso VC
    J Pediatr (Rio J); 2020; 96(4):511-519. PubMed ID: 31026416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic approach to fetal microcephaly.
    Leibovitz Z; Lerman-Sagie T
    Eur J Paediatr Neurol; 2018 Nov; 22(6):935-943. PubMed ID: 29970280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.