These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31161027)
1. Rejection of Schmidt et al.'s estimators for bear population size. Becker E; Christ A Ecol Evol; 2019 May; 9(10):6157-6164. PubMed ID: 31161027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improving inference for aerial surveys of bears: The importance of assumptions and the cost of unnecessary complexity. Schmidt JH; Wilson TL; Thompson WL; Reynolds JH Ecol Evol; 2017 Jul; 7(13):4812-4821. PubMed ID: 28690810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multiple data sources improve DNA-based mark-recapture population estimates of grizzly bears. Boulanger J; Kendall KC; Stetz JB; Roon DA; Waits LP; Paetkau D Ecol Appl; 2008 Apr; 18(3):577-89. PubMed ID: 18488618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Aerial surveys cause large but ephemeral decreases in bear presence at salmon streams in Kodiak, Alaska. Deacy WW; Leacock WB; Ward EJ; Armstrong JB PLoS One; 2019; 14(9):e0222085. PubMed ID: 31504063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accounting for imperfect detection of groups and individuals when estimating abundance. Clement MJ; Converse SJ; Royle JA Ecol Evol; 2017 Sep; 7(18):7304-7310. PubMed ID: 28944018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An on-ice aerial survey of the Kane Basin polar bear ( Wiig Ø; Atkinson SN; Born EW; Stapleton S; Arnold T; Dyck M; Laidre KL; Lunn NJ; Regehr EV Polar Biol; 2022; 45(1):89-100. PubMed ID: 35125636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of distance on detectability of Arctic waterfowl using double-observer sampling during helicopter surveys. Alisauskas RT; Conn PB Ecol Evol; 2019 Jan; 9(2):859-867. PubMed ID: 30766675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability of different mark-recapture methods for population size estimation tested against reference population sizes constructed from field data. Grimm A; Gruber B; Henle K PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e98840. PubMed ID: 24896260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Estimating the abundance of mouse populations of known size: promises and pitfalls of new methods. Conn PB; Arthur AD; Bailey LL; Singleton GR Ecol Appl; 2006 Apr; 16(2):829-37. PubMed ID: 16711066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Capture-recapture when time and behavioral response affect capture probabilities. Chao A; Chu W; Hsu CH Biometrics; 2000 Jun; 56(2):427-33. PubMed ID: 10877300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Integrating sign surveys and telemetry data for estimating brown bear ( Popescu VD; Iosif R; Pop MI; Chiriac S; Bouroș G; Furnas BJ Ecol Evol; 2017 Sep; 7(18):7134-7144. PubMed ID: 28944005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Distance software: design and analysis of distance sampling surveys for estimating population size. Thomas L; Buckland ST; Rexstad EA; Laake JL; Strindberg S; Hedley SL; Bishop JR; Marques TA; Burnham KP J Appl Ecol; 2010 Feb; 47(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 20383262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]