These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3116131)

  • 1. Metabolic monitor.
    Meriläinen PT
    Int J Clin Monit Comput; 1987; 4(3):167-77. PubMed ID: 3116131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation of an indirect calorimeter using n-of-1 methodology.
    Frankenfield DC; Ashcraft CM; Wood C; Chinchilli VM
    Clin Nutr; 2016 Feb; 35(1):163-168. PubMed ID: 25707909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro evaluation of a compact metabolic measurement instrument.
    Weissman C; Sardar A; Kemper M
    JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 1990; 14(2):216-21. PubMed ID: 2112632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of metabolic monitors in critically ill, ventilated patients.
    Singer P; Pogrebetsky I; Attal-Singer J; Cohen J
    Nutrition; 2006; 22(11-12):1077-86. PubMed ID: 16973331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measuring energy expenditure in the intensive care unit: a comparison of indirect calorimetry by E-sCOVX and Quark RMR with Deltatrac II in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients.
    Rehal MS; Fiskaare E; Tjäder I; Norberg Å; Rooyackers O; Wernerman J
    Crit Care; 2016 Mar; 20():54. PubMed ID: 26951095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Metabolic monitoring in the intensive care unit: a comparison of the Medgraphics Ultima, Deltatrac II, and Douglas bag collection methods.
    Black C; Grocott MP; Singer M
    Br J Anaesth; 2015 Feb; 114(2):261-8. PubMed ID: 25354946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the accuracy and precision of a new generation indirect calorimeter in canopy dilution mode.
    Delsoglio M; Dupertuis YM; Oshima T; van der Plas M; Pichard C
    Clin Nutr; 2020 Jun; 39(6):1927-1934. PubMed ID: 31543335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Indirect calorimetry in humans: a postcalorimetric evaluation procedure for correction of metabolic monitor variability.
    Schadewaldt P; Nowotny B; Strassburger K; Kotzka J; Roden M
    Am J Clin Nutr; 2013 Apr; 97(4):763-73. PubMed ID: 23446893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Continuous non-invasive monitoring of energy expenditure, oxygen consumption and alveolar ventilation during controlled ventilation: validation in an oxygen consuming lung model.
    Holk K; Einarsson SG; Svensson KL; Bengtson JP; Stenqvist O
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 1996 May; 40(5):530-7. PubMed ID: 8792881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Precision and accuracy in a metabolic monitor for indirect calorimetry.
    Wells JC; Fuller NJ
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 1998 Jul; 52(7):536-40. PubMed ID: 9683338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Application of indirect calorimetry in monitoring feeding of low birth-weight preterm infants].
    Krämer T; Böhler T; Janecke AR; Hoffmann GF; Linderkamp O
    Klin Padiatr; 1999; 211(5):389-93. PubMed ID: 10572895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vitro validation of a metabolic monitor for gas exchange measurements in ventilated neonates.
    Behrends M; Kernbach M; Bräuer A; Braun U; Peters J; Weyland W
    Intensive Care Med; 2001 Jan; 27(1):228-35. PubMed ID: 11280640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A validation and comparison study of two metabolic monitors.
    Phang PT; Rich T; Ronco J
    JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 1990; 14(3):259-61. PubMed ID: 2112638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of three indirect calorimetry devices in mechanically ventilated patients: which device compares best with the Deltatrac II(®)? A prospective observational study.
    Graf S; Karsegard VL; Viatte V; Heidegger CP; Fleury Y; Pichard C; Genton L
    Clin Nutr; 2015 Feb; 34(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 24485773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Device for the Quantification of Oxygen Consumption and Caloric Expenditure in the Neonatal Range.
    Nachman E; Clemensen P; Santos K; Cole AR; Polizzotti BD; Hofmann G; Leeman KT; van den Bosch SJ; Kheir JN
    Anesth Analg; 2018 Jul; 127(1):95-104. PubMed ID: 29505450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical validation of the Deltatrac monitoring system in mechanically ventilated patients.
    Tissot S; Delafosse B; Bertrand O; Bouffard Y; Viale JP; Annat G
    Intensive Care Med; 1995 Feb; 21(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 7775696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison between the Datex-Ohmeda M-COVX metabolic monitor and the Deltatrac II in mechanically ventilated patients.
    McLellan S; Walsh T; Burdess A; Lee A
    Intensive Care Med; 2002 Jul; 28(7):870-6. PubMed ID: 12122524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A water-sealed indirect calorimeter for measurement of oxygen consumption (VO2), carbon dioxide production (VCO2), and energy expenditure in infants.
    Dechert RE; Wesley JR; Schafer LE; LaMond S; Nicks J; Coran AG; Bartlett RH
    JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 1988; 12(3):256-9. PubMed ID: 3134559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of an equation for energy expenditure that does not require the respiratory quotient.
    Kaiyala KJ; Wisse BE; Lighton JRB
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0211585. PubMed ID: 30707737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Indirect calorimetry in mechanically ventilated patients. A systematic comparison of three instruments.
    Sundström M; Tjäder I; Rooyackers O; Wernerman J
    Clin Nutr; 2013 Feb; 32(1):118-21. PubMed ID: 22763268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.