These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31161378)

  • 1. Misconduct and Misbehavior Related to Authorship Disagreements in Collaborative Science.
    Smith E; Williams-Jones B; Master Z; Larivière V; Sugimoto CR; Paul-Hus A; Shi M; Resnik DB
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2020 Aug; 26(4):1967-1993. PubMed ID: 31161378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Researchers' Perceptions of Ethical Authorship Distribution in Collaborative Research Teams.
    Smith E; Williams-Jones B; Master Z; Larivière V; Sugimoto CR; Paul-Hus A; Shi M; Diller E; Caudle K; Resnik DB
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2020 Aug; 26(4):1995-2022. PubMed ID: 31165383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How do researchers perceive research misbehaviors? A case study of Indian researchers.
    Palla IA; Singson M
    Account Res; 2023 Dec; 30(8):707-724. PubMed ID: 35584318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Authorship in scientific publications: analysis and recommendations.
    ; Hess CW; Brückner C; Kaiser T; Mauron A; Wahli W; Wenzel UJ; Salathé M
    Swiss Med Wkly; 2015; 145():w14108. PubMed ID: 25701667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Researchers experience of misconduct in research in Malaysian higher education institutions.
    Olesen AP; Amin L; Mahadi Z
    Account Res; 2018; 25(3):125-141. PubMed ID: 29394103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Responsibility for scientific misconduct in collaborative papers.
    Helgesson G; Eriksson S
    Med Health Care Philos; 2018 Sep; 21(3):423-430. PubMed ID: 29222668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In Their Own Words: Research Misconduct from the Perspective of Researchers in Malaysian Universities.
    Olesen AP; Amin L; Mahadi Z
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Dec; 24(6):1755-1776. PubMed ID: 29249021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Authorship Issues When Articles are Retracted Due to Research Misconduct and Then Resubmitted.
    Banerjee T; Partin K; Resnik DB
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2022 Jul; 28(4):31. PubMed ID: 35796841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Associations between attitudes towards scientific misconduct and self-reported behavior.
    Holm S; Hofmann B
    Account Res; 2018; 25(5):290-300. PubMed ID: 29874932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Scientific Fraud, Publication Bias, and Honorary Authorship in Nuclear Medicine.
    Kwee TC; Almaghrabi MT; Kwee RM
    J Nucl Med; 2023 Feb; 64(2):200-203. PubMed ID: 36215567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Exploring researchers' perspectives on authorship decision making.
    Maggio LA; Artino AR; Watling CJ; Driessen EW; O'Brien BC
    Med Educ; 2019 Dec; 53(12):1253-1262. PubMed ID: 31475382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Scientists Still Behaving Badly? A Survey Within Industry and Universities.
    Godecharle S; Fieuws S; Nemery B; Dierickx K
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Dec; 24(6):1697-1717. PubMed ID: 28971354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reducing tensions and expediting manuscript submission via an authorship agreement for early-career researchers: A pilot study.
    Norman MK; Proulx CN; Rubio DM; Mayowski CA
    Account Res; 2023 Dec; 30(7):379-392. PubMed ID: 34743618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Authorship: attitudes and practice among Norwegian researchers.
    Nylenna M; Fagerbakk F; Kierulf P
    BMC Med Ethics; 2014 Jul; 15():53. PubMed ID: 24989359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Civil disobedience in scientific authorship: Resistance and insubordination in science.
    Penders B; Shaw DM
    Account Res; 2020 Aug; 27(6):347-371. PubMed ID: 32299255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Psychotherapy researchers: reported misbehaviors and opinions.
    Braun M; Roussos AJ
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2012 Dec; 7(5):25-9. PubMed ID: 23324200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Academic and Scientific Authorship Practices: A Survey Among South African Researchers.
    Breet E; Botha J; Horn L; Swartz L
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2018 Oct; 13(4):412-420. PubMed ID: 30091400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceptions of Chinese Biomedical Researchers Towards Academic Misconduct: A Comparison Between 2015 and 2010.
    Liao QJ; Zhang YY; Fan YC; Zheng MH; Bai Y; Eslick GD; He XX; Zhang SB; Xia HH; He H
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Apr; 24(2):629-645. PubMed ID: 28397174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perceptions of research integrity and the Chinese situation: In-depth interviews with Chinese biomedical researchers in Europe.
    Yi N; Nemery B; Dierickx K
    Account Res; 2019 Oct; 26(7):405-426. PubMed ID: 31379202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Integrity of Clinical Neuroradiological Research.
    Kwee RM; Almaghrabi MT; Kwee TC
    Clin Neuroradiol; 2024 Jun; 34(2):325-331. PubMed ID: 38095663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.