151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31162186)
1. A Nano-Dose Protocol For Cobb Angle Assessment in Children With Scoliosis: Results of a Phantom-based and Clinically Validated Study.
Pedersen PH; Vergari C; Tran A; Xavier F; Jaeger A; Laboudie P; Housset V; Eiskjær SP; Vialle R
Clin Spine Surg; 2019 Aug; 32(7):E340-E345. PubMed ID: 31162186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A reduced micro-dose protocol for 3D reconstruction of the spine in children with scoliosis: results of a phantom-based and clinically validated study using stereo-radiography.
Pedersen PH; Vergari C; Alzakri A; Vialle R; Skalli W
Eur Radiol; 2019 Apr; 29(4):1874-1881. PubMed ID: 30350165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. New EOS Imaging Protocol Allows a Substantial Reduction in Radiation Exposure for Scoliosis Patients.
Newton PO; Khandwala Y; Bartley CE; Reighard FG; Bastrom TP; Yaszay B
Spine Deform; 2016 Mar; 4(2):138-144. PubMed ID: 27927546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical validation of coronal and sagittal spinal curve measurements based on three-dimensional vertebra vector parameters.
Somoskeöy S; Tunyogi-Csapó M; Bogyó C; Illés T
Spine J; 2012 Oct; 12(10):960-8. PubMed ID: 23018164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. EOS Micro-dose Protocol: First Full-spine Radiation Dose Measurements in Anthropomorphic Phantoms and Comparisons with EOS Standard-dose and Conventional Digital Radiology.
Pedersen PH; Petersen AG; Østgaard SE; Tvedebrink T; Eiskjær SP
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2018 Nov; 43(22):E1313-E1321. PubMed ID: 30383725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development and validation of a bespoke phantom to test accuracy of Cobb angle measurements.
Alrehily F; Hogg P; Twiste M; Johansen S; Tootell A
Radiography (Lond); 2020 May; 26(2):e78-e87. PubMed ID: 32052769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of two- and three-dimensional measurement of the Cobb angle in scoliosis.
Lechner R; Putzer D; Dammerer D; Liebensteiner M; Bach C; Thaler M
Int Orthop; 2017 May; 41(5):957-962. PubMed ID: 27921155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of 3-dimensional spinal reconstruction accuracy: biplanar radiographs with EOS versus computed tomography.
Glaser DA; Doan J; Newton PO
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jul; 37(16):1391-7. PubMed ID: 22415001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability analysis of Cobb angle measurements of congenital scoliosis using X-ray and 3D-CT images.
Tauchi R; Tsuji T; Cahill PJ; Flynn JM; Flynn JM; Glotzbecker M; El-Hawary R; Heflin JA; Imagama S; Joshi AP; Nohara A; Ramirez N; Roye DP; Saito T; Sawyer JR; Smith JT; Kawakami N
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2016 Jan; 26(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 26377663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A reliability and validity study for Scolioscan: a radiation-free scoliosis assessment system using 3D ultrasound imaging.
Zheng YP; Lee TT; Lai KK; Yip BH; Zhou GQ; Jiang WW; Cheung JC; Wong MS; Ng BK; Cheng JC; Lam TP
Scoliosis Spinal Disord; 2016; 11():13. PubMed ID: 27299162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. EOS microdose protocol for the radiological follow-up of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Ilharreborde B; Ferrero E; Alison M; Mazda K
Eur Spine J; 2016 Feb; 25(2):526-31. PubMed ID: 25906380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A reliability and validity study for different coronal angles using ultrasound imaging in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Brink RC; Wijdicks SPJ; Tromp IN; Schlösser TPC; Kruyt MC; Beek FJA; Castelein RM
Spine J; 2018 Jun; 18(6):979-985. PubMed ID: 29056566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intra- and Interrater Reliability of Cobb Angle Measurements on the Plane of Maximum Curvature Using Ultrasound Imaging Method.
Trac S; Zheng R; Hill DL; Lou E
Spine Deform; 2019 Jan; 7(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 30587314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy and reliability of coronal and sagittal spinal curvature data based on patient-specific three-dimensional models created by the EOS 2D/3D imaging system.
Somoskeöy S; Tunyogi-Csapó M; Bogyó C; Illés T
Spine J; 2012 Nov; 12(11):1052-9. PubMed ID: 23102842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability of radiographic measures for infantile idiopathic scoliosis.
Corona J; Sanders JO; Luhmann SJ; Diab M; Vitale MG
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Jun; 94(12):e86. PubMed ID: 22717838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Spinal phantom comparability study of Cobb angle measurement of scoliosis using digital radiographic imaging.
Chung N; Cheng YH; Po HL; Ng WK; Cheung KC; Yung HY; Lai YM
J Orthop Translat; 2018 Oct; 15():81-90. PubMed ID: 30533384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of Scoliosis With a Commercially Available Ultrasound System.
Lv P; Chen J; Dong L; Wang L; Deng Y; Li K; Huang X; Zhang C
J Ultrasound Med; 2020 Jan; 39(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 31190407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability analysis of a smartphone-aided measurement method for the Cobb angle of scoliosis.
Qiao J; Liu Z; Xu L; Wu T; Zheng X; Zhu Z; Zhu F; Qian B; Qiu Y
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Jun; 25(4):E88-92. PubMed ID: 22237178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliability analysis for manual measurement of coronal plane deformity in adolescent scoliosis. Are 30 x 90 cm plain films better than digitized small films?
De Carvalho A; Vialle R; Thomsen L; Amzallag J; Cluzel G; le Pointe HD; Mary P
Eur Spine J; 2007 Oct; 16(10):1615-20. PubMed ID: 17619912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A semi-automatic 3D ultrasound reconstruction method to assess the true severity of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Vo QN; Le LH; Lou E
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2019 Oct; 57(10):2115-2128. PubMed ID: 31367838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
