These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31162643)

  • 1. Misunderstandings and omissions in textbook accounts of effect sizes.
    Morris PH
    Br J Psychol; 2020 May; 111(2):395-410. PubMed ID: 31162643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Things we still haven't learned (so far).
    Ivarsson A; Andersen MB; Stenling A; Johnson U; Lindwall M
    J Sport Exerc Psychol; 2015 Aug; 37(4):449-61. PubMed ID: 26442774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The new statistics: why and how.
    Cumming G
    Psychol Sci; 2014 Jan; 25(1):7-29. PubMed ID: 24220629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Moving college health research forward: Reconsidering our reliance on statistical significance testing.
    Barry AE; Valdez D; Goodson P; Szucs L; Reyes JV
    J Am Coll Health; 2019 Apr; 67(3):181-188. PubMed ID: 29952723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Why the resistance to statistical innovations? A comment on Sharpe (2013).
    Cohen BH
    Psychol Methods; 2017 Mar; 22(1):204-210. PubMed ID: 27253584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Statistics in ophthalmology revisited: the (effect) size matters.
    Grzybowski A; Mianowany M
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2018 Nov; 96(7):e885-e888. PubMed ID: 30187631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists.
    Nakagawa S; Cuthill IC
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2007 Nov; 82(4):591-605. PubMed ID: 17944619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The continuing misuse of null hypothesis significance testing in biological anthropology.
    Smith RJ
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2018 May; 166(1):236-245. PubMed ID: 29345299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Moving Beyond p < 0.05 in Ecotoxicology: A Guide for Practitioners.
    Erickson RA; Rattner BA
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2020 Sep; 39(9):1657-1669. PubMed ID: 32539165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Current controversies: Null hypothesis significance testing.
    Sedgwick PM; Hammer A; Kesmodel US; Pedersen LH
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2022 Jun; 101(6):624-627. PubMed ID: 35451497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The epistemology of mathematical and statistical modeling: a quiet methodological revolution.
    Rodgers JL
    Am Psychol; 2010 Jan; 65(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 20063905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Null hypothesis significance testing: a review of an old and continuing controversy.
    Nickerson RS
    Psychol Methods; 2000 Jun; 5(2):241-301. PubMed ID: 10937333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neuroscience Needs to Test Both Statistical and Scientific Hypotheses.
    Alger BE
    J Neurosci; 2022 Nov; 42(45):8432-8438. PubMed ID: 36351823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Violations of Assumptions in School-Based Single-Case Data: Implications for the Selection and Interpretation of Effect Sizes.
    Solomon BG
    Behav Modif; 2014 Jul; 38(4):477-96. PubMed ID: 24235178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. When Null Hypothesis Significance Testing Is Unsuitable for Research: A Reassessment.
    Szucs D; Ioannidis JPA
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2017; 11():390. PubMed ID: 28824397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robust misinterpretation of confidence intervals.
    Hoekstra R; Morey RD; Rouder JN; Wagenmakers EJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Oct; 21(5):1157-64. PubMed ID: 24420726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A review of issues about null hypothesis Bayesian testing.
    Tendeiro JN; Kiers HAL
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Dec; 24(6):774-795. PubMed ID: 31094544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Null hypothesis significance testing and effect sizes: can we 'effect' everything … or … anything?
    Lovell DP
    Curr Opin Pharmacol; 2020 Apr; 51():68-77. PubMed ID: 31948894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Certainty Behind Reporting a Significance Result: What the Clinician Should Know.
    Kumbhare D; Alavinia SM
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2019 Dec; 98(12):1147-1150. PubMed ID: 31464749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How to select, calculate, and interpret effect sizes.
    Durlak JA
    J Pediatr Psychol; 2009 Oct; 34(9):917-28. PubMed ID: 19223279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.