215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31162870)
1. Online information on dysmenorrhoea: An evaluation of readability, credibility, quality and usability.
Lovett J; Gordon C; Patton S; Chen CX
J Clin Nurs; 2019 Oct; 28(19-20):3590-3598. PubMed ID: 31162870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Googling endometriosis: a systematic review of information available on the Internet.
Hirsch M; Aggarwal S; Barker C; Davis CJ; Duffy JMN
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 May; 216(5):451-458.e1. PubMed ID: 27840143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Readability of web-based sources about induced abortion: a cross-sectional study.
Georgsson S; Carlsson T
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2020 Jun; 20(1):102. PubMed ID: 32503524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The quality, understandability, readability, and popularity of online educational materials for heart murmur.
Arslan D; Sami Tutar M; Kozanhan B; Bagci Z
Cardiol Young; 2020 Mar; 30(3):328-336. PubMed ID: 31875800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Online nutrition information for pregnant women: a content analysis.
Storr T; Maher J; Swanepoel E
Matern Child Nutr; 2017 Apr; 13(2):. PubMed ID: 27353248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluating the Quality and Readability of Internet Information on Meningiomas.
Saeed F; Anderson I
World Neurosurg; 2017 Jan; 97():312-316. PubMed ID: 27742505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure: an assessment of the quality and readability of online information.
Lim SJM; Kelly M; Selvarajah L; Murray M; Scanlon T
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 May; 21(1):149. PubMed ID: 33952225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Credibility, readability and content analysis of treatment recommendations for adolescents with nonspecific back pain published on consumer websites.
Hauber SD; Robinson K; Fechner R; Pate JW; O'Sullivan K
Eur J Pain; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38752319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Critical analysis of the quality of internet resources for patients with varicose veins.
Yan Q; Field AR; Jensen KJ; Goei C; Jiang Z; Davies MG
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2021 Jul; 9(4):1017-1024.e7. PubMed ID: 33340728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cauda equina syndrome: assessing the readability and quality of patient information on the Internet.
O'Neill SC; Baker JF; Fitzgerald C; Fleming C; Rowan F; Byrne D; Synnott K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 May; 39(10):E645-9. PubMed ID: 24583736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Consulting Dr. Google: Quality of Online Resources About Tympanostomy Tube Placement.
Harris VC; Links AR; Hong P; Walsh J; Schoo DP; Tunkel DE; Stewart CM; Boss EF
Laryngoscope; 2018 Feb; 128(2):496-501. PubMed ID: 28842989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Water fluoridation and the quality of information available online.
Frangos Z; Steffens M; Leask J
Int Dent J; 2018 Aug; 68(4):253-261. PubMed ID: 29441567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Analysis of the Patient Information Quality and Readability on Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) on the Internet.
Priyanka P; Hadi YB; Reynolds GJ
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018; 2018():2849390. PubMed ID: 30510923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A systematic review of internet-based information for individuals with Raynaud's phenomenon and patients with systemic sclerosis.
Devgire V; Martin AF; McKenzie L; Sandler RD; Hughes M
Clin Rheumatol; 2020 Aug; 39(8):2363-2367. PubMed ID: 32152916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An evaluation of the quality of online information on emergency contraception.
Agrawal S; Irwin C; Dhillon-Smith RK
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2021 Aug; 26(4):343-348. PubMed ID: 33688778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluating Quality, Credibility, and Readability of Online Over-the-Counter Hearing Aid Information.
Shah V; Lava CX; Hakimi AA; Hoa M
Laryngoscope; 2024 Jul; 134(7):3302-3309. PubMed ID: 38280186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating the Quality, Content, and Readability of Online Resources for Failed Back Spinal Surgery.
Guo WJ; Wang WK; Xu D; Qiao Z; Shi YL; Luo P
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Apr; 44(7):494-502. PubMed ID: 30234809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality and Readability Assessment of Websites on Human Papillomavirus and Oropharyngeal Cancer.
Schwarzbach HL; Mady LJ; Kaffenberger TM; Duvvuri U; Jabbour N
Laryngoscope; 2021 Jan; 131(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 32282087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Varicocele Embolization: An Assessment of the Quality and Readability of Online Patient Information.
Alderson JH; O'Neil DC; Redmond CE; Mulholland D; Lee MJ
Acad Radiol; 2020 Jun; 27(6):841-846. PubMed ID: 31494004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of quality and readability of internet-based health information related to commonly prescribed angiotensin receptor blockers.
Oloidi A; Nduaguba SO; Obamiro K
Pan Afr Med J; 2020; 35():70. PubMed ID: 32537073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
