BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

652 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31164146)

  • 1. XL-DNase-seq: improved footprinting of dynamic transcription factors.
    Oh KS; Ha J; Baek S; Sung MH
    Epigenetics Chromatin; 2019 Jun; 12(1):30. PubMed ID: 31164146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Genome-Scale Analysis of Cell-Specific Regulatory Codes Using Nuclear Enzymes.
    Baek S; Sung MH
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1418():225-40. PubMed ID: 27008018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reproducible inference of transcription factor footprints in ATAC-seq and DNase-seq datasets using protocol-specific bias modeling.
    Karabacak Calviello A; Hirsekorn A; Wurmus R; Yusuf D; Ohler U
    Genome Biol; 2019 Feb; 20(1):42. PubMed ID: 30791920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of computational footprinting methods for DNase sequencing experiments.
    Gusmao EG; Allhoff M; Zenke M; Costa IG
    Nat Methods; 2016 Apr; 13(4):303-9. PubMed ID: 26901649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. BinDNase: a discriminatory approach for transcription factor binding prediction using DNase I hypersensitivity data.
    Kähärä J; Lähdesmäki H
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Sep; 31(17):2852-9. PubMed ID: 25957350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genomic Footprinting Analyses from DNase-seq Data to Construct Gene Regulatory Networks.
    Moyano TC; Gutiérrez RA; Alvarez JM
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2328():25-46. PubMed ID: 34251618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Explicit DNase sequence bias modeling enables high-resolution transcription factor footprint detection.
    Yardımcı GG; Frank CL; Crawford GE; Ohler U
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2014 Oct; 42(19):11865-78. PubMed ID: 25294828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. DeFCoM: analysis and modeling of transcription factor binding sites using a motif-centric genomic footprinter.
    Quach B; Furey TS
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Apr; 33(7):956-963. PubMed ID: 27993786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genome-wide footprinting: ready for prime time?
    Sung MH; Baek S; Hager GL
    Nat Methods; 2016 Mar; 13(3):222-228. PubMed ID: 26914206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. maxATAC: Genome-scale transcription-factor binding prediction from ATAC-seq with deep neural networks.
    Cazares TA; Rizvi FW; Iyer B; Chen X; Kotliar M; Bejjani AT; Wayman JA; Donmez O; Wronowski B; Parameswaran S; Kottyan LC; Barski A; Weirauch MT; Prasath VBS; Miraldi ER
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2023 Jan; 19(1):e1010863. PubMed ID: 36719906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bivariate Genomic Footprinting Detects Changes in Transcription Factor Activity.
    Baek S; Goldstein I; Hager GL
    Cell Rep; 2017 May; 19(8):1710-1722. PubMed ID: 28538187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. ATAC2GRN: optimized ATAC-seq and DNase1-seq pipelines for rapid and accurate genome regulatory network inference.
    Pranzatelli TJF; Michael DG; Chiorini JA
    BMC Genomics; 2018 Jul; 19(1):563. PubMed ID: 30064353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Most brain disease-associated and eQTL haplotypes are not located within transcription factor DNase-seq footprints in brain.
    Handel AE; Gallone G; Zameel Cader M; Ponting CP
    Hum Mol Genet; 2017 Jan; 26(1):79-89. PubMed ID: 27798116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. ATAC-seq with unique molecular identifiers improves quantification and footprinting.
    Zhu T; Liao K; Zhou R; Xia C; Xie W
    Commun Biol; 2020 Nov; 3(1):675. PubMed ID: 33188264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Advances in assay for transposase-accessible chromatin with high-throughput sequencing].
    Wu J; Quan JP; Ye Y; Wu ZF; Yang J; Yang M; Zheng EQ
    Yi Chuan; 2020 Apr; 42(4):333-346. PubMed ID: 32312702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Identification of transcription factor binding sites using ATAC-seq.
    Li Z; Schulz MH; Look T; Begemann M; Zenke M; Costa IG
    Genome Biol; 2019 Feb; 20(1):45. PubMed ID: 30808370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intrinsic bias estimation for improved analysis of bulk and single-cell chromatin accessibility profiles using SELMA.
    Hu SS; Liu L; Li Q; Ma W; Guertin MJ; Meyer CA; Deng K; Zhang T; Zang C
    Nat Commun; 2022 Sep; 13(1):5533. PubMed ID: 36130957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. TRACE: transcription factor footprinting using chromatin accessibility data and DNA sequence.
    Ouyang N; Boyle AP
    Genome Res; 2020 Jul; 30(7):1040-1046. PubMed ID: 32660981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interrogating the Accessible Chromatin Landscape of Eukaryote Genomes Using ATAC-seq.
    Marinov GK; Shipony Z
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2243():183-226. PubMed ID: 33606259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantification, Dynamic Visualization, and Validation of Bias in ATAC-Seq Data with ataqv.
    Orchard P; Kyono Y; Hensley J; Kitzman JO; Parker SCJ
    Cell Syst; 2020 Mar; 10(3):298-306.e4. PubMed ID: 32213349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 33.