142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31165105)
1. Evaluation of Bond Strength, Nanoleakage, and Marginal Adaptation of Bulk-fill Composites Submitted to Thermomechanical Aging.
Pereira R; Lima DANL; Giorgi MCC; Marchi GM; Aguiar FHB
J Adhes Dent; 2019; 21(3):255-264. PubMed ID: 31165105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Low- and high-viscosity bulk-fill resin composites: a comparison of microhardness, microtensile bond strength, and fracture strength in restored molars.
França FM; Tenuti JG; Broglio IP; Paiva LE; Basting RT; Turssi CP; do Amaral FL; Reis AF; Vieira-Junior WF
Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2021 Aug; 34(2):173-182. PubMed ID: 34570866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of Composite Resin and Restorative Technique on Polymerization Shrinkage Stress, Cuspal Strain and Fracture Load of Weakened Premolars.
Martins LC; Oliveira LRS; Braga SSL; Soares CJ; Versluis A; Borges GA; Veríssimo C
J Adhes Dent; 2020; 22(5):503-514. PubMed ID: 33073781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical Time Required and Internal Adaptation in Cavities restored with Bulk-fill Composites.
Vianna-de-Pinho MG; Rego GF; Vidal ML; Alonso RCB; Schneider LFJ; Cavalcante LM
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Dec; 18(12):1107-1111. PubMed ID: 29208783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interfacial Stress and Bond Strength of Bulk-Fill or Conventional Composite Resins to Dentin in Class II Restorations.
Duarte JCL; Costa AR; Veríssimo C; Duarte RW; Calabrez Filho S; Spohr AM; Borges GA; Correr-Sobrinho L
Braz Dent J; 2020; 31(5):532-539. PubMed ID: 33146338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Marginal adaptation of class II cavities restored with bulk-fill composites.
Campos EA; Ardu S; Lefever D; Jassé FF; Bortolotto T; Krejci I
J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):575-81. PubMed ID: 24561041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Polymerization Shrinkage, Physical Properties, and Marginal Adaptation of Flowable and Restorative Bulk Fill Resin-Based Composites.
Jung JH; Park SH
Oper Dent; 2017; 42(4):375-386. PubMed ID: 28402737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Marginal Integrity of Bulk Versus Incremental Fill Class II Composite Restorations.
Al-Harbi F; Kaisarly D; Bader D; El Gezawi M
Oper Dent; 2016; 41(2):146-56. PubMed ID: 26266653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Could sonic delivery of bulk-fill resins improve the bond strength and cure depth in extended size class I cavities?
Penha KS; Souza AF; Dos Santos MJ; Júnior LDS; Tavarez RJ; Firoozmand LM
J Clin Exp Dent; 2020 Dec; 12(12):e1131-e1138. PubMed ID: 33282133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Microtensile bond strength of bulk-fill restorative composites to dentin.
Mandava J; Vegesna DP; Ravi R; Boddeda MR; Uppalapati LV; Ghazanfaruddin MD
J Clin Exp Dent; 2017 Aug; 9(8):e1023-e1028. PubMed ID: 28936294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Microtensile Bond Strength of Bulk-fill Resin Composite Restorations in High C-factor Cavities.
de Oliveira ILM; de Brito OFF; de Melo Monteiro LMCGQ; Resende Montes MAJ
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Jun; 21(6):626-631. PubMed ID: 33025930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interfacial Properties and Bottom/Top Hardness Ratio Produced by Bulk Fill Composites in Dentin Cavities.
Chaves LVF; Oliveira SN; Özcan M; Acchar W; Caldas MRGR; Assunção IV; Souza ROAE; Borges BCD
Braz Dent J; 2019; 30(5):476-483. PubMed ID: 31596332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical behaviour of bulk-fill resin composites in class II restorations.
Lins RBE; Aristilde S; Osório JH; Cordeiro CMB; Yanikian CRF; Bicalho AA; Stape THS; Soares CJ; Martins LRM
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Oct; 98():255-261. PubMed ID: 31280052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bond Strength of a Flowable Bulk-fill Resin Composite in Class II MOD Cavities.
Kumagai RY; Zeidan LC; Rodrigues JA; Reis AF; Roulet JF
J Adhes Dent; 2015 Aug; 17(5):427-32. PubMed ID: 26525007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of bulk-fill systems: microtensile bond strength and non-destructive imaging of marginal adaptation.
Fronza BM; Makishi P; Sadr A; Shimada Y; Sumi Y; Tagami J; Giannini M
Braz Oral Res; 2018 Aug; 32():e80. PubMed ID: 30088553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cervical Interfacial Bonding Effectiveness of Class II Bulk Versus Incremental Fill Resin Composite Restorations.
Al-Harbi F; Kaisarly D; Michna A; ArRejaie A; Bader D; El Gezawi M
Oper Dent; 2015; 40(6):622-35. PubMed ID: 26151459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Marginal Gap Formation in Approximal "Bulk Fill" Resin Composite Restorations After Artificial Ageing.
Peutzfeldt A; Mühlebach S; Lussi A; Flury S
Oper Dent; 2018; 43(2):180-189. PubMed ID: 29148914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Effects of Cavity Preparation and Composite Resin on Bond Strength and Stress Distribution Using the Microtensile Bond Test.
Braga S; Oliveira L; Rodrigues RB; Bicalho AA; Novais VR; Armstrong S; Soares CJ
Oper Dent; 2018; 43(1):81-89. PubMed ID: 28976839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adhesiveness of bulk-fill composite resin in permanent molars submitted to Streptococcus mutans biofilm.
Fidalgo TKDS; Americano G; Medina D; Athayde G; Letieri ADS; Maia LC
Braz Oral Res; 2019; 33():e111. PubMed ID: 31800863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Characterization and Comparative Analysis of Voids in Class II Composite Resin Restorations by Optical Coherence Tomography.
Pardo Díaz CA; Shimokawa C; Sampaio CS; Freitas AZ; Turbino ML
Oper Dent; 2020; 45(1):71-79. PubMed ID: 31226004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
