These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31165452)

  • 21. Numerical magnitude affects temporal memories but not time encoding.
    Cai ZG; Wang R
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e83159. PubMed ID: 24489646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Robustness of individual differences in temporal interference effects.
    Schlichting N; de Jong R; van Rijn H
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0202345. PubMed ID: 30107001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Opposite Distortions in Interval Timing Perception for Visual and Auditory Stimuli with Temporal Modulations.
    Yuasa K; Yotsumoto Y
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0135646. PubMed ID: 26292285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evidence for different processes involved in the effects of nontemporal stimulus size and numerical digit value on duration judgments.
    Rammsayer TH; Verner M
    J Vis; 2016 May; 16(7):13. PubMed ID: 27191941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effect of nontemporal stimulus size on perceived duration as assessed by the method of reproduction.
    Rammsayer TH; Verner M
    J Vis; 2014 May; 14(5):17. PubMed ID: 24879864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Motion illusions in optical art presented for long durations are temporally distorted.
    Nather FC; Mecca FF; Bueno JL
    Perception; 2013; 42(7):742-50. PubMed ID: 24344550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Flicker-Induced Time Dilation Does Not Modulate EEG Correlates of Temporal Encoding.
    Herbst SK; Chaumon M; Penney TB; Busch NA
    Brain Topogr; 2015 Jul; 28(4):559-69. PubMed ID: 25117576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Flexible mental processes in numerical size judgments: the case of Hebrew letters that are used to convey numbers.
    Razpurker-Apfeld I; Koriat A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Feb; 13(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 16724772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Stimulus duration has little effect on auditory, visual and audiovisual temporal order judgement.
    Tiippana K; Salmela VR
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 May; 236(5):1273-1282. PubMed ID: 29484457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The oddball effect: perceived duration and predictive coding.
    Schindel R; Rowlands J; Arnold DH
    J Vis; 2011 Feb; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 21350128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A generalized magnitude system for space, time, and quantity? A cautionary note.
    Yates MJ; Loetscher T; Nicholls ME
    J Vis; 2012 Jul; 12(7):. PubMed ID: 22822089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. There and back again: revisiting the on-time effect.
    Zivony A; Lamy D
    Vision Res; 2015 Aug; 113(Pt A):11-21. PubMed ID: 25988752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of perceived length on numerosity estimation: Evidence from the Müller-Lyer illusion.
    Dormal V; Larigaldie N; Lefèvre N; Pesenti M; Andres M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Oct; 71(10):2142-2151. PubMed ID: 30226431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Malleability of mappings between Arabic numerals and approximate quantities: Factors underlying individual differences and the relation to math.
    Yeo DJ; Wilkey ED; Price GR
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jul; 198():102877. PubMed ID: 31310890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Stimulus expectation prolongs rather than shortens perceived duration: Evidence from self-generated expectations.
    Birngruber T; Schröter H; Schütt E; Ulrich R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jan; 44(1):117-127. PubMed ID: 28481566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Bottom-up and top-down attentional contributions to the size congruity effect.
    Sobel KV; Puri AM; Faulkenberry TJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jul; 78(5):1324-36. PubMed ID: 27052836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Time in perspective.
    Gorea A; Hau J
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Aug; 24(8):1477-86. PubMed ID: 23774463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Spatial bias in symbolic and non-symbolic numerical comparison in neglect.
    Masson N; Pesenti M; Dormal V
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Aug; 51(10):1925-32. PubMed ID: 23774183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The number of letters in number words influences the response time in numerical comparison tasks: Evidence using Korean number words.
    Kwon D; Oh S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Nov; 81(8):2612-2618. PubMed ID: 31605301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Numerical magnitude modulates temporal comparison: an ERP study.
    Xuan B; Chen XC; He S; Zhang DR
    Brain Res; 2009 May; 1269():135-42. PubMed ID: 19306851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.