BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31165631)

  • 21. A dependent Dirichlet process model for survival data with competing risks.
    Shi Y; Laud P; Neuner J
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2021 Jan; 27(1):156-176. PubMed ID: 33044613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Quantifying the average of the time-varying hazard ratio via a class of transformations.
    Chen Q; Zeng D; Ibrahim JG; Chen MH; Pan Z; Xue X
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2015 Apr; 21(2):259-79. PubMed ID: 25073864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Confidence intervals for the first crossing point of two hazard functions.
    Cheng MY; Qiu P; Tan X; Tu D
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2009 Dec; 15(4):441-54. PubMed ID: 19882351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Sample size calculations in the presence of competing risks.
    Latouche A; Porcher R
    Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(30):5370-80. PubMed ID: 17955563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Goodness-of-fit test for proportional subdistribution hazards model.
    Zhou B; Fine J; Laird G
    Stat Med; 2013 Sep; 32(22):3804-11. PubMed ID: 23625840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Linear and nonlinear variable selection in competing risks data.
    Ren X; Li S; Shen C; Yu Z
    Stat Med; 2018 Jun; 37(13):2134-2147. PubMed ID: 29579776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Joint modeling of multivariate longitudinal data and the dropout process in a competing risk setting: application to ICU data.
    Deslandes E; Chevret S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Jul; 10():69. PubMed ID: 20670425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A competing risks analysis of bloodstream infection after stem-cell transplantation using subdistribution hazards and cause-specific hazards.
    Beyersmann J; Dettenkofer M; Bertz H; Schumacher M
    Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(30):5360-9. PubMed ID: 17634974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Simulation shows undesirable results for competing risks analysis with time-dependent covariates for clinical outcomes.
    Poguntke I; Schumacher M; Beyersmann J; Wolkewitz M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Jul; 18(1):79. PubMed ID: 30012114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard models to simultaneously estimate the absolute risk of different event types: Cumulative total failure probability may exceed 1.
    Austin PC; Steyerberg EW; Putter H
    Stat Med; 2021 Aug; 40(19):4200-4212. PubMed ID: 33969508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Competing time-to-event endpoints in cardiology trials: a simulation study to illustrate the importance of an adequate statistical analysis.
    Rauch G; Kieser M; Ulrich S; Doherty P; Rauch B; Schneider S; Riemer T; Senges J
    Eur J Prev Cardiol; 2014 Jan; 21(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 22964966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Kidney Graft Failure and Patient Survival Modelling Based on Competing Risks Under Nonproportional Hazards.
    Valenta Z; Skrabaka D; Owczarek AJ; Kolonko A; Król R; Więcek A; Ziaja J
    Transplant Proc; 2022 May; 54(4):940-947. PubMed ID: 35450721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Subdistribution hazard models for competing risks in discrete time.
    Berger M; Schmid M; Welchowski T; Schmitz-Valckenberg S; Beyersmann J
    Biostatistics; 2020 Jul; 21(3):449-466. PubMed ID: 30418529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The Average Hazard Ratio - A Good Effect Measure for Time-to-event Endpoints when the Proportional Hazard Assumption is Violated?
    Rauch G; Brannath W; Brückner M; Kieser M
    Methods Inf Med; 2018 May; 57(3):89-100. PubMed ID: 29719915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Misspecified regression model for the subdistribution hazard of a competing risk.
    Beyersmann J; Schumacher M
    Stat Med; 2007 Mar; 26(7):1649-51. PubMed ID: 17054104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Methods of competing risks flexible parametric modeling for estimation of the risk of the first disease among HIV infected men.
    Nouri S; Mahmoudi M; Mohammad K; Mansournia MA; Yaseri M; Akhtar-Danesh N
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jan; 20(1):17. PubMed ID: 31996148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Penalized variable selection in competing risks regression.
    Fu Z; Parikh CR; Zhou B
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2017 Jul; 23(3):353-376. PubMed ID: 27016934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Estimation of the Absolute Risk of Cardiovascular Disease and Other Events: Issues With the Use of Multiple Fine-Gray Subdistribution Hazard Models.
    Austin PC; Putter H; Lee DS; Steyerberg EW
    Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2022 Feb; 15(2):e008368. PubMed ID: 35098725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. PSHREG: a SAS macro for proportional and nonproportional subdistribution hazards regression.
    Kohl M; Plischke M; Leffondré K; Heinze G
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2015 Feb; 118(2):218-33. PubMed ID: 25572709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Hierarchical likelihood inference on clustered competing risks data.
    Christian NJ; Ha ID; Jeong JH
    Stat Med; 2016 Jan; 35(2):251-67. PubMed ID: 26278918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.