These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31165631)

  • 41. Reformulating the hazard ratio to enhance communication with clinical investigators.
    Moser BK; McCann MH
    Clin Trials; 2008; 5(3):248-52. PubMed ID: 18559414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. On the relation between the cause-specific hazard and the subdistribution rate for competing risks data: The Fine-Gray model revisited.
    Putter H; Schumacher M; van Houwelingen HC
    Biom J; 2020 May; 62(3):790-807. PubMed ID: 32128860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Introducing a new estimator and test for the weighted all-cause hazard ratio.
    Ozga AK; Rauch G
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jun; 19(1):118. PubMed ID: 31185922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Polynomial spline estimation and inference of proportional hazards regression models with flexible relative risk form.
    Huang JZ; Liu L
    Biometrics; 2006 Sep; 62(3):793-802. PubMed ID: 16984322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Analysis of clustered competing risks data using subdistribution hazard models with multivariate frailties.
    Ha ID; Christian NJ; Jeong JH; Park J; Lee Y
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Dec; 25(6):2488-2505. PubMed ID: 24619110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Safety analysis of new medications in clinical trials: a simulation study to assess the differences between cause-specific and subdistribution frameworks in the presence of competing events.
    Genet A; Bogner K; Goertz R; Böhme S; Leverkus F
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Jul; 23(1):168. PubMed ID: 37442979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Proportional subdistribution hazards modeling offers a summary analysis, even if misspecified.
    Grambauer N; Schumacher M; Beyersmann J
    Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(7-8):875-84. PubMed ID: 20213713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Variable selection in subdistribution hazard frailty models with competing risks data.
    Ha ID; Lee M; Oh S; Jeong JH; Sylvester R; Lee Y
    Stat Med; 2014 Nov; 33(26):4590-604. PubMed ID: 25042872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Augmenting the logrank test in the design of clinical trials in which non-proportional hazards of the treatment effect may be anticipated.
    Royston P; Parmar MK
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Feb; 16():16. PubMed ID: 26869168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Sample size determination for jointly testing a cause-specific hazard and the all-cause hazard in the presence of competing risks.
    Yang Q; Fung WK; Li G
    Stat Med; 2018 Apr; 37(8):1389-1401. PubMed ID: 29282764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Competing risks regression for stratified data.
    Zhou B; Latouche A; Rocha V; Fine J
    Biometrics; 2011 Jun; 67(2):661-70. PubMed ID: 21155744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Vertical modelling: Analysis of competing risks data with missing causes of failure.
    Nicolaie MA; van Houwelingen HC; Putter H
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2015 Dec; 24(6):891-908. PubMed ID: 22179822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. G-estimation of structural nested mean models for competing risks data using pseudo-observations.
    Tanaka S; Brookhart MA; Fine JP
    Biostatistics; 2020 Oct; 21(4):860-875. PubMed ID: 31056651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Hierarchical proportional hazards regression models for highly stratified data.
    Carlin BP; Hodges JS
    Biometrics; 1999 Dec; 55(4):1162-70. PubMed ID: 11315063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Time-dependent covariates in the proportional subdistribution hazards model for competing risks.
    Beyersmann J; Schumacher M
    Biostatistics; 2008 Oct; 9(4):765-76. PubMed ID: 18434297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. SAS macros for estimation of direct adjusted cumulative incidence curves under proportional subdistribution hazards models.
    Zhang X; Zhang MJ
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2011 Jan; 101(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 20724020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A new approach to regression analysis of censored competing-risks data.
    Jin Y; Lai TL
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2017 Oct; 23(4):605-625. PubMed ID: 27502000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A Monte Carlo approach for change-point detection in the Cox proportional hazards model.
    Liu M; Lu W; Shao Y
    Stat Med; 2008 Aug; 27(19):3894-909. PubMed ID: 18254131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Variable selection in competing risks models based on quantile regression.
    Li E; Tian M; Tang ML
    Stat Med; 2019 Oct; 38(23):4670-4685. PubMed ID: 31359443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. An empirical comparison of statistical tests for assessing the proportional hazards assumption of Cox's model.
    Ng'andu NH
    Stat Med; 1997 Mar; 16(6):611-26. PubMed ID: 9131751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.