These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31165632)

  • 1. A joint modeling framework of responses and response times to assess learning outcomes.
    Wang S; Zhang S; Shen Y
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2020; 55(1):49-68. PubMed ID: 31165632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using Response Times and Response Accuracy to Measure Fluency Within Cognitive Diagnosis Models.
    Wang S; Chen Y
    Psychometrika; 2020 Sep; 85(3):600-629. PubMed ID: 32816238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Longitudinal joint modeling for assessing parallel interactive development of latent ability and processing speed using responses and response times.
    Zhan P; Chen Q; Wang S; Zhang X
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Mar; 56(3):1656-1677. PubMed ID: 37059896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bayesian Extended Redundancy Analysis: A Bayesian Approach to Component-based Regression with Dimension Reduction.
    Choi JY; Kyung M; Hwang H; Park JH
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2020; 55(1):30-48. PubMed ID: 31021267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Simple use of BIC to Assess Model Selection Uncertainty: An Illustration using Mediation and Moderation Models.
    Wu H; Fai Cheung S; On Leung S
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2020; 55(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 30932709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modeling Learner Heterogeneity: A Mixture Learning Model With Responses and Response Times.
    Zhang S; Wang S
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():2339. PubMed ID: 30568609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using Diagnostic Classification Models to Validate Attribute Hierarchies and Evaluate Model Fit in Bayesian Networks.
    Hu B; Templin J
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2020; 55(2):300-311. PubMed ID: 31287339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of latent-variable estimation in Bayesian semi-supervised learning.
    Yamazaki K
    Neural Netw; 2015 Sep; 69():1-10. PubMed ID: 26005790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of additional data on Bayesian clustering.
    Yamazaki K
    Neural Netw; 2017 Oct; 94():86-95. PubMed ID: 28755617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Joint analysis of mixed types of outcomes with latent variables.
    Pan D; Wei Y; Song X
    Stat Med; 2021 Feb; 40(5):1272-1284. PubMed ID: 33296950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Part 2. Development of Enhanced Statistical Methods for Assessing Health Effects Associated with an Unknown Number of Major Sources of Multiple Air Pollutants.
    Park ES; Symanski E; Han D; Spiegelman C
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2015 Jun; (183 Pt 1-2):51-113. PubMed ID: 26333239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Asymptotic accuracy of Bayesian estimation for a single latent variable.
    Yamazaki K
    Neural Netw; 2015 Sep; 69():11-9. PubMed ID: 26022203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Design of pharmacokinetic studies for latent covariates.
    Lagishetty CV; Coulter CV; Duffull SB
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2012 Feb; 39(1):87-97. PubMed ID: 22161222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Bayesian Approach to More Stable Estimates of Group-Level Effects in Contextual Studies.
    Zitzmann S; Lüdtke O; Robitzsch A
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2015; 50(6):688-705. PubMed ID: 26717127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bayesian estimation of multidimensional latent variables and its asymptotic accuracy.
    Yamazaki K
    Neural Netw; 2018 Sep; 105():14-25. PubMed ID: 29763741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A mixture model for the joint analysis of latent developmental trajectories and survival.
    Klein Entink RH; Fox JP; van den Hout A
    Stat Med; 2011 Aug; 30(18):2310-25. PubMed ID: 21544846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A simple and flexible Bayesian method for inferring step changes in cognition.
    Lee MD
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Apr; 51(2):948-960. PubMed ID: 30066261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modeling Differences Between Response Times of Correct and Incorrect Responses.
    Bolsinova M; Tijmstra J
    Psychometrika; 2019 Dec; 84(4):1018-1046. PubMed ID: 31463656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measuring Skill Growth and Evaluating Change: Unconditional and Conditional Approaches to Latent Growth Cognitive Diagnostic Models.
    Lin Q; Xing K; Park YS
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():2205. PubMed ID: 33041889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Development of a Multidimensional Diagnostic Assessment With Learning Tools to Improve 3-D Mental Rotation Skills.
    Wang S; Hu Y; Wang Q; Wu B; Shen Y; Carr M
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():305. PubMed ID: 32174870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.