These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31166216)

  • 1. Misuse of Regression Adjustment for Additional Confounders Following Insufficient Propensity Score Balancing.
    Shinozaki T; Nojima M
    Epidemiology; 2019 Jul; 30(4):541-548. PubMed ID: 31166216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Statistical primer: propensity score matching and its alternatives.
    Benedetto U; Head SJ; Angelini GD; Blackstone EH
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2018 Jun; 53(6):1112-1117. PubMed ID: 29684154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of approaches for stratifying on the propensity score to reduce bias.
    Linden A
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2017 Aug; 23(4):690-696. PubMed ID: 28074629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of confounding adjustment methods with an application to early life determinants of childhood obesity.
    Li L; Kleinman K; Gillman MW
    J Dev Orig Health Dis; 2014 Dec; 5(6):435-47. PubMed ID: 25171142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the use and misuse of scalar scores of confounders in design and analysis of observational studies.
    Pfeiffer RM; Riedl R
    Stat Med; 2015 Aug; 34(18):2618-35. PubMed ID: 25781579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Time-dependent propensity score and collider-stratification bias: an example of beta2-agonist use and the risk of coronary heart disease.
    Sanni Ali M; Groenwold RH; Pestman WR; Belitser SV; Hoes AW; de Boer A; Klungel OH
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2013 Apr; 28(4):291-9. PubMed ID: 23354982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Studies with many covariates and few outcomes: selecting covariates and implementing propensity-score-based confounding adjustments.
    Patorno E; Glynn RJ; Hernández-Díaz S; Liu J; Schneeweiss S
    Epidemiology; 2014 Mar; 25(2):268-78. PubMed ID: 24487209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On variance estimate for covariate adjustment by propensity score analysis.
    Zou B; Zou F; Shuster JJ; Tighe PJ; Koch GG; Zhou H
    Stat Med; 2016 Sep; 35(20):3537-48. PubMed ID: 26999553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Which Propensity Score Method Best Reduces Confounder Imbalance? An Example From a Retrospective Evaluation of a Childhood Obesity Intervention.
    Schroeder K; Jia H; Smaldone A
    Nurs Res; 2016; 65(6):465-474. PubMed ID: 27801717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Control for confounding in case-control studies using the stratification score, a retrospective balancing score.
    Allen AS; Satten GA
    Am J Epidemiol; 2011 Apr; 173(7):752-60. PubMed ID: 21402731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reporting of covariate selection and balance assessment in propensity score analysis is suboptimal: a systematic review.
    Ali MS; Groenwold RH; Belitser SV; Pestman WR; Hoes AW; Roes KC; Boer Ad; Klungel OH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Feb; 68(2):112-21. PubMed ID: 25433444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of propensity scores, disease risk scores, and regression in confounder adjustment for the safety of emerging treatment with group sequential monitoring.
    Xu S; Shetterly S; Cook AJ; Raebel MA; Goonesekera S; Shoaibi A; Roy J; Fireman B
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2016 Apr; 25(4):453-61. PubMed ID: 26875591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Addressing substantial covariate imbalance with propensity score stratification and balancing weights: connections and recommendations.
    Thomas LE; Thomas SM; Li F; Matsouaka RA
    Epidemiol Methods; 2023 Jan; 12(1):20220131. PubMed ID: 38013684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimating effects of nursing intervention via propensity score analysis.
    Qin R; Titler MG; Shever LL; Kim T
    Nurs Res; 2008; 57(6):444-52. PubMed ID: 19018219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A brief introduction to propensity score for anesthesiologists.
    De Cassai A; Andreatta G; Boscolo A; Munari M; Navalesi P
    Korean J Anesthesiol; 2020 Aug; 73(4):296-301. PubMed ID: 32238789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Propensity Score Methods and Covariate Adjustment: Evaluation in 4 Cardiovascular Studies.
    Elze MC; Gregson J; Baber U; Williamson E; Sartori S; Mehran R; Nichols M; Stone GW; Pocock SJ
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2017 Jan; 69(3):345-357. PubMed ID: 28104076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Double-adjustment in propensity score matching analysis: choosing a threshold for considering residual imbalance.
    Nguyen TL; Collins GS; Spence J; Daurès JP; Devereaux PJ; Landais P; Le Manach Y
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Apr; 17(1):78. PubMed ID: 28454568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of the E-value in the presence of bias amplification: a simulation study.
    Barrette E; Higuera L; Wherry K
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2024 Mar; 24(1):79. PubMed ID: 38539082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of prediction modeling in propensity score estimation: an evaluation of logistic regression, bCART, and the covariate-balancing propensity score.
    Wyss R; Ellis AR; Brookhart MA; Girman CJ; Jonsson Funk M; LoCasale R; Stürmer T
    Am J Epidemiol; 2014 Sep; 180(6):645-55. PubMed ID: 25143475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Balancing versus modelling in weighted analysis of non-randomised studies with survival outcomes: A simulation study.
    Filla T; Schwender H; Kuss O
    Stat Med; 2024 Jul; 43(17):3140-3163. PubMed ID: 38801062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.