222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31166395)
1. Influence of Abutment Collar Height and Implant Length on Stress Distribution in Single Crowns.
Bordin D; Cury AADB; Faot F
Braz Dent J; 2019 Jun; 30(3):238-243. PubMed ID: 31166395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of increased crown height on stress distribution in short dental implant components and their surrounding bone: A finite element analysis.
Bulaqi HA; Mousavi Mashhadi M; Safari H; Samandari MM; Geramipanah F
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jun; 113(6):548-57. PubMed ID: 25794917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A finite element analysis of two different dental implants: stress distribution in the prosthesis, abutment, implant, and supporting bone.
Quaresma SE; Cury PR; Sendyk WR; Sendyk C
J Oral Implantol; 2008; 34(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 18390236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dental implant and abutment in PEEK: stress assessment in single crown retainers on anterior region.
de Almeida MVR; Ribeiro MCO; Dos Reis-Neta GR; Vargas-Moreno VF; Gomes RS; da Silva WJ; Del Bel Cury AA; Marcello-Machado RM
Clin Oral Investig; 2024 May; 28(6):336. PubMed ID: 38795258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical Evaluation of Different Implant-Abutment Connections, Retention Systems, and Restorative Materials in the Implant-Supported Single Crowns Using 3D Finite Element Analysis.
Lemos CAA; Verri FR; Noritomi PY; de Souza Batista VE; Cruz RS; de Luna Gomes JM; de Oliveira Limírio JPJ; Pellizzer EP
J Oral Implantol; 2022 Jun; 48(3):194-201. PubMed ID: 34091686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of different restorative crown and customized abutment materials on stress distribution in single implants and peripheral bone: A three-dimensional finite element analysis study.
Kaleli N; Sarac D; Külünk S; Öztürk Ö
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Mar; 119(3):437-445. PubMed ID: 28645667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical Effect of Prosthetic Connection and Implant Body Shape in Low-Quality Bone of Maxillary Posterior Single Implant-Supported Restorations.
de Andrade CL; Carvalho MA; Del Bel Cury AA; Sotto-Maior BS
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):e92-7. PubMed ID: 27447166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of Implant Inclination and Prosthetic Abutment Type on the Biomechanics of Implant-Supported Fixed Partial Dentures.
Poletto-Neto V; Tretto PHW; Zen BM; Bacchi A; Dos Santos MBF
J Oral Implantol; 2019 Oct; 45(5):343-350. PubMed ID: 31429636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical Comparison of Different Implant Inclinations and Cantilever Lengths in All-on-4 Treatment Concept by Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
Ozan O; Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 29340344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical Behavior of the Dental Implant Macrodesign.
Lima de Andrade C; Carvalho MA; Bordin D; da Silva WJ; Del Bel Cury AA; Sotto-Maior BS
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(2):264-270. PubMed ID: 28291847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of platform connection and abutment material on stress distribution in single anterior implant-supported restorations: a nonlinear 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Carvalho MA; Sotto-Maior BS; Del Bel Cury AA; Pessanha Henriques GE
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1096-102. PubMed ID: 24831744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical effects of two different collar implant structures on stress distribution under cantilever fixed partial dentures.
Merıç G; Erkmen E; Kurt A; Eser A; özden AU
Acta Odontol Scand; 2011 Nov; 69(6):374-84. PubMed ID: 21449688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of Connection Types and Implant Number on the Biomechanical Behavior of Mandibular Full-Arch Rehabilitation.
Sousa RM; Simamoto-Junior PC; Fernandes-Neto AJ; Sloten JV; Jaecques SV; Pessoa RS
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):750-60. PubMed ID: 27447140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does Abutment Collar Length Affect Abutment Screw Loosening After Cyclic Loading?
Siadat H; Pirmoazen S; Beyabanaki E; Alikhasi M
J Oral Implantol; 2015 Jul; 41 Spec No():346-51. PubMed ID: 26237093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the mechanical characteristics of the implant-abutment complex of a reduced-diameter morse-taper implant. A nonlinear finite element stress analysis.
Akça K; Cehreli MC; Iplikçioğlu H
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2003 Aug; 14(4):444-54. PubMed ID: 12869007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of abutment screw preload in two implant connection systems: A 3D finite element study.
Jung WK; Lee WS; Kwon HB
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Nov; 122(5):474.e1-474.e8. PubMed ID: 31590980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of the Biomechanical Behaviors of Implants with Different Connections, Lengths, and Diameters Placed in the Maxillary Anterior Region.
Borie E; Orsi IA; Noritomi PY; Kemmoku DT
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 26478969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of transmucosal height in abutments of single and multiple implant-supported prostheses: a non-linear three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Borie E; Leal E; Orsi IA; Salamanca C; Dias FJ; Weber B
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2018 Jan; 21(1):91-97. PubMed ID: 29318899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stress distribution with extra-short implants in an angled frictional system: A finite element analysis study.
de Souza Rendohl E; Brandt WC
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec; 124(6):728.e1-728.e9. PubMed ID: 32694020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three-dimensional Finite Element Stress Pattern Analysis in Bone around Implant-supported Abutment with Different Angulations under Axial and Oblique Load.
Uppalapati V; Kumar S; Aggarwal R; Bhat I; Munaganti J; Khan S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2023 Jan; 24(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 37189007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
