These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31166395)

  • 21. [Different short dental implants on the stress distribution in posterior maxilla: a three-dimensional finite element analysis].
    Li X; Staden RV; Hong G
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Nov; 49(11):662-6. PubMed ID: 25622500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Biomechanical Comparison of a New Triple Cylindrical Implant Design and a Conventional Cylindrical Implant Design on the Mandible by Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
    Bayrak A; Yaramanoğlu P; Kılıçarslan MA; Yaramanoğlu B; Akat B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(2):257-264. PubMed ID: 32142561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Influence of Alveolar Bone Loss and Different Alloys on the Biomechanical Behavior of Internal-and External-Connection Implants: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
    Tsouknidas A; Lympoudi E; Michalakis K; Giannopoulos D; Michailidis N; Pissiotis A; Fytanidis D; Kugiumtzis D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(3):e30-42. PubMed ID: 26009924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Platform switching: biomechanical evaluation using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Tabata LF; Rocha EP; Barão VA; Assunção WG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):482-91. PubMed ID: 21691594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Comparative analysis of different types of implant-abutment interface on the basis of three-dimensional finite element analysis data].
    Muraev AA; Ivanov SY; Leonov SV; Mrue AH; Muhametshin RF; Gazhva YV
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 2019; 98(1):11-16. PubMed ID: 30830086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Stress distribution in the abutment and retention screw of a single implant supporting a prosthesis with platform switching.
    Alvarez-Arenal A; Segura-Mori L; Gonzalez-Gonzalez I; Gago A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(3):e112-21. PubMed ID: 23748329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of crown stiffness and prosthetic screw absence on the stress distribution in implant-supported restoration: A 3D finite element analysis.
    Epifania E; di Lauro AE; Ausiello P; Mancone A; Garcia-Godoy F; Mendes Tribst JP
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(5):e0285421. PubMed ID: 37146083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of Stress Distribution and Deformation of Four Prosthetic Materials in Full-mouth Rehabilitation with Implants: A Three-dimensional Finite Element Study.
    Chand YB; Mahendra J; Jigeesh N; Mahendra L; Shivasubramanian L; Perika SB
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Nov; 21(11):1210-1217. PubMed ID: 33850065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Regular and platform switching: bone stress analysis varying implant type.
    Gurgel-Juarez NC; de Almeida EO; Rocha EP; Freitas AC; Anchieta RB; de Vargas LC; Kina S; França FM
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 22372756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of the effect of an offset implant configuration in the posterior maxilla with external hexagon implant platform: A 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    de Souza Batista VE; Verri FR; Almeida DAF; Santiago Junior JF; Lemos CAA; Pellizzer EP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Sep; 118(3):363-371. PubMed ID: 28222876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of implant-assisted removable partial dentures.
    Eom JW; Lim YJ; Kim MJ; Kwon HB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jun; 117(6):735-742. PubMed ID: 27914668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of Different Customized Abutment Types on Stress Distribution in Implant-Supported Single Crown: A 3D Finite Element Analysis.
    Pumnil S; Rungsiyakull P; Rungsiyakull C; Elsaka S
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Jun; 31(5):e2-e11. PubMed ID: 35505638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Influence of Ceramic Materials on Biomechanical Behavior of Implant Supported Fixed Prosthesis with Hybrid Abutment.
    Tribst JPM; Dal Piva AMO; Özcan M; Borges ALS; Bottino MA
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2019 May; 27(2):76-82. PubMed ID: 31046208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Finite element analysis of stress extent at peri-implant bone surrounding external hexagon or Morse taper implants.
    Macedo JP; Pereira J; Faria J; Pereira CA; Alves JL; Henriques B; Souza JCM; López-López J
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 Jul; 71():441-447. PubMed ID: 28499606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Morse taper performance: A finite element analysis study.
    Petris GP; De Carli JP; Paranhos LR; Santos PL; Benetti P; Walber M; Linden ES; Linden MSS
    Clinics (Sao Paulo); 2019 Mar; 74():e852. PubMed ID: 30916212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Influence of occlusal forces on stress distribution in preloaded dental implant screws.
    Alkan I; Sertgöz A; Ekici B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Apr; 91(4):319-25. PubMed ID: 15116032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of the prosthetic index on stress distribution in Morse taper connection implant system and peri-implant bone: a 3D finite element analysis.
    Zhang WT; Cheng KJ; Liu YF; Wang R; Chen YF; Ding YD; Yang F; Wang LH
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Sep; 22(1):431. PubMed ID: 36180871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of different impactor designs on biomechanical behavior in the interface bone-implant: A comparative biomechanics study.
    Bachiri A; Djebbar N; Boutabout B; Serier B
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Dec; 197():105723. PubMed ID: 32877819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Different Treatment Modalities Using Dental Implants in the Posterior Maxilla: A Finite Element Analysis.
    Bordin D; Castro MB; Carvalho MA; Araujo AM; Cury AADB; Lazari-Carvalho PC
    Braz Dent J; 2021; 32(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 33914000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The Effect of Three Different Crown Heights and Two Different Bone Types on Implants Placed in the Posterior Maxilla: Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
    Cinar D; Imirzalioglu P
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(2):e1-e10. PubMed ID: 27004295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.