174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31166400)
1. Effect of EDTA and QMIX Ultrasonic Activation on the Reduction of Microorganisms and Endotoxins in Ex Vivo Human Root Canals.
Matos FS; Khoury RD; Carvalho CAT; Martinho FC; Bresciani E; Valera MC
Braz Dent J; 2019 Jun; 30(3):220-226. PubMed ID: 31166400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of sodium hypochlorite solution and gel with/without passive ultrasonic irrigation on
Abu Hasna A; Pereira Da Silva L; Pelegrini FC; Ferreira CLR; de Oliveira LD; Carvalho CAT
F1000Res; 2020; 9():642. PubMed ID: 33149896
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. QMix® irrigant reduces lipopolysacharide (LPS) levels in an in vitro model.
Gründling GL; Melo TA; Montagner F; Scarparo RK; Vier-Pelisser FV
J Appl Oral Sci; 2015; 23(4):431-5. PubMed ID: 26398517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Antimicrobial efficacy of 0.5% peracetic acid and EDTA with passive ultrasonic or manual agitation in an Enterococcus faecalis biofilm model.
Hartmann RC; Neuvald L; Barth V; de Figueiredo JAP; de Oliveira SD; Scarparo RK; Waltrick SB; Rossi-Fedele G
Aust Endod J; 2019 Apr; 45(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 30105835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the smear layer removal and decalcification effect of QMix, maleic acid and EDTA on root canal dentine.
Ballal NV; Jain I; Tay FR
J Dent; 2016 Aug; 51():62-8. PubMed ID: 27287285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vitro comparison of antimicrobial effectiveness of QMix and other final irrigants in human root canals.
Liu Y; Guo L; Li Y; Guo X; Wang B; Wu L
Sci Rep; 2015 Dec; 5():17823. PubMed ID: 26631907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effectiveness of ethylenediaminetetraacetic, etidronic, and peracetic acids activated with ultrasonics or diode laser on calcium hydroxide removal from root canal walls.
Savur IG; Ulusoy OI
Niger J Clin Pract; 2021 Nov; 24(11):1662-1668. PubMed ID: 34782506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Antibacterial and residual antimicrobial activities of five final irrigants in infected root canal: an in vitro comparative study].
Wu Z; Guo XJ; Qiao F; Wu LG
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Sep; 51(9):532-7. PubMed ID: 27596342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Antibacterial Efficacy of a New Sonic Irrigation Device for Root Canal Disinfection.
Neuhaus KW; Liebi M; Stauffacher S; Eick S; Lussi A
J Endod; 2016 Dec; 42(12):1799-1803. PubMed ID: 27780580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of different final irrigation methods on the removal of calcium hydroxide from an artificial standardized groove in the apical third of root canals.
Capar ID; Ozcan E; Arslan H; Ertas H; Aydinbelge HA
J Endod; 2014 Mar; 40(3):451-4. PubMed ID: 24565670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Canal cleanliness using different irrigation activation systems: a SEM evaluation.
Urban K; Donnermeyer D; Schäfer E; Bürklein S
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Dec; 21(9):2681-2687. PubMed ID: 28185091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effectiveness of Different Disinfection Protocols on the Reduction of Bacteria in Enterococcus faecalis Biofilm in Teeth with Large Root Canals.
Pladisai P; Ampornaramveth RS; Chivatxaranukul P
J Endod; 2016 Mar; 42(3):460-4. PubMed ID: 26830428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Disinfecting oval-shaped root canals: effectiveness of different supplementary approaches.
Alves FR; Almeida BM; Neves MA; Moreno JO; Rôças IN; Siqueira JF
J Endod; 2011 Apr; 37(4):496-501. PubMed ID: 21419297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation on Enterococcus faecalis from Root Canals: An Ex Vivo Study.
Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM; Chávez-Andrade GM; de Faria-Júnior NB; Watanabe E; Tanomaru-Filho M
Braz Dent J; 2015; 26(4):342-6. PubMed ID: 26312969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The efficacy of photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming and sonic-activated irrigation combined with QMiX solution or sodium hypochlorite against intracanal E. faecalis biofilm.
Balić M; Lucić R; Mehadžić K; Bago I; Anić I; Jakovljević S; Plečko V
Lasers Med Sci; 2016 Feb; 31(2):335-42. PubMed ID: 26754179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ex vivo evaluation of various instrumentation techniques and irrigants in reducing E. faecalis within root canals.
Basmaci F; Oztan MD; Kiyan M
Int Endod J; 2013 Sep; 46(9):823-30. PubMed ID: 23441862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of passive ultrasonic irrigation on diffusion of hydroxyl ion through radicular dentine.
Cidade FH; Schmidt TF; Dos Santos LG; Tay FR; da Silveira Teixeira C; Felippe MC; Bortoluzzi EA
Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Mar; 20(2):247-52. PubMed ID: 26036770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A modified dentine infection model with fluorescent lipopolysaccharide and lipopolysaccharides sampling technique to compare XP-Endo finisher and passive ultrasonic irrigation.
Alfirdous RA; Alquiria TA; Jacinto RC; Martinho FC
Int Endod J; 2022 Oct; 55(10):1081-1090. PubMed ID: 35950779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of final disinfection protocols using antimicrobial photodynamic therapy and different irrigants after single-file reciprocating instrumentation against intracanal bacterial biofilm - An in vitro study.
Batinić M; Ročan M; Budimir A; Anić I; Bago I
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2018 Dec; 24():153-157. PubMed ID: 30308309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Penetration degree of sealer in artificial lateral canal after passive ultrasonic irrigation with EDTA for different times.
da Silva DP; Silva IMR; Falcao LF; Falcao DF; Ferraz MÁA; Falcao CAM
Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2019 Aug; 32(2):51-56. PubMed ID: 31664293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
