These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31166843)
1. Reporting quality of systematic reviews of interventions aimed at improving vaccination coverage: compliance with PRISMA guidelines. Ndze VN; Jaca A; Wiysonge CS Hum Vaccin Immunother; 2019; 15(12):2836-2843. PubMed ID: 31166843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Exploring reporting quality of systematic reviews and Meta-analyses on nursing interventions in patients with Alzheimer's disease before and after PRISMA introduction. Sun X; Zhou X; Yu Y; Liu H BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Nov; 18(1):154. PubMed ID: 30497417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Compliance of systematic reviews in ophthalmology with the PRISMA statement. Lee SY; Sagoo H; Farwana R; Whitehurst K; Fowler A; Agha R BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):178. PubMed ID: 29281981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas. Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Nursing Interventions in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease: General Implications of the Findings. Sun X; Zhou X; Zhang Y; Liu H J Nurs Scholarsh; 2019 May; 51(3):308-316. PubMed ID: 30806019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews of interventions aimed at improving vaccination coverage using AMSTAR and ROBIS checklists. Jaca A; Ndze VN; Wiysonge CS Hum Vaccin Immunother; 2019; 15(12):2824-2835. PubMed ID: 31348722 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Reporting quality of Cochrane systematic reviews with Chinese herbal medicines. Zhang X; Aixinjueluo QY; Li SY; Song LL; Lau CT; Tan R; Bian ZX Syst Rev; 2019 Dec; 8(1):302. PubMed ID: 31796121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review. Page MJ; Moher D Syst Rev; 2017 Dec; 6(1):263. PubMed ID: 29258593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quality of reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in emergency medicine based on the PRISMA statement. Nawijn F; Ham WHW; Houwert RM; Groenwold RHH; Hietbrink F; Smeeing DPJ BMC Emerg Med; 2019 Feb; 19(1):19. PubMed ID: 30744570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Longitudinal analysis of reporting and quality of systematic reviews in high-impact surgical journals. Chapman SJ; Drake TM; Bolton WS; Barnard J; Bhangu A Br J Surg; 2017 Feb; 104(3):198-204. PubMed ID: 28001294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Survey of the reporting characteristics of systematic reviews in rehabilitation. Gianola S; Gasparini M; Agostini M; Castellini G; Corbetta D; Gozzer P; Li LC; Sirtori V; Taricco M; Tetzlaff JM; Turolla A; Moher D; Moja L Phys Ther; 2013 Nov; 93(11):1456-66. PubMed ID: 23744458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions. Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Hernández-Romero JL; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Maestre-López B; González-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernández PJ; García-Nieto AV; Isla-Tejera B BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):180. PubMed ID: 29284417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Topics and PRISMA Checklist Compliance for Meta-analyses in Dermatology: Journal Case Study. Poveda-Montoyo I; Belinchón-Romero I; Romero-Pérez D; Ramos-Rincón JM Acta Dermatovenerol Croat; 2019 Dec; 27(4):275-277. PubMed ID: 31969243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A PRISMA assessment of the reporting quality of systematic reviews of nursing published in the Cochrane Library and paper-based journals. Zhang J; Han L; Shields L; Tian J; Wang J Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Dec; 98(49):e18099. PubMed ID: 31804319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Compliance With Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Individual Participant Data Statement for Meta-Analyses Published for Stroke Studies. Jumah F; Chotai S; Ashraf O; Rallo MS; Raju B; Gadhiya A; Sun H; Narayan V; Gupta G; Nanda A Stroke; 2021 Aug; 52(9):2817-2826. PubMed ID: 34082573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The future of Cochrane Neonatal. Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Endorsement of PRISMA statement and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in nursing journals: a cross-sectional study. Tam WW; Lo KK; Khalechelvam P BMJ Open; 2017 Feb; 7(2):e013905. PubMed ID: 28174224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Association of study quality with completeness of reporting: have completeness of reporting and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in major radiology journals changed since publication of the PRISMA statement? Tunis AS; McInnes MD; Hanna R; Esmail K Radiology; 2013 Nov; 269(2):413-26. PubMed ID: 23824992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Compliance of Systematic Reviews in Plastic Surgery With the PRISMA Statement. Lee SY; Sagoo H; Whitehurst K; Wellstead G; Fowler AJ; Agha RA; Orgill D JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2016; 18(2):101-5. PubMed ID: 26719993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The assessment of the quality of reporting of systematic reviews/meta-analyses in diagnostic tests published by authors in China. Ge L; Wang JC; Li JL; Liang L; An N; Shi XT; Liu YC; Tian JH PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e85908. PubMed ID: 24465781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]