These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31167150)

  • 1. Predicting individual speech intelligibility from the cortical tracking of acoustic- and phonetic-level speech representations.
    Lesenfants D; Vanthornhout J; Verschueren E; Decruy L; Francart T
    Hear Res; 2019 Sep; 380():1-9. PubMed ID: 31167150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Data-driven spatial filtering for improved measurement of cortical tracking of multiple representations of speech.
    Lesenfants D; Vanthornhout J; Verschueren E; Francart T
    J Neural Eng; 2019 Oct; 16(6):066017. PubMed ID: 31426053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cortical auditory responses index the contributions of different RMS-level-dependent segments to speech intelligibility.
    Wang L; Li H; Wu EX; Chen F
    Hear Res; 2019 Nov; 383():107808. PubMed ID: 31606583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neural Speech Tracking in the Theta and in the Delta Frequency Band Differentially Encode Clarity and Comprehension of Speech in Noise.
    Etard O; Reichenbach T
    J Neurosci; 2019 Jul; 39(29):5750-5759. PubMed ID: 31109963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Neural indices of phonemic discrimination and sentence-level speech intelligibility in quiet and noise: A P3 study.
    Koerner TK; Zhang Y; Nelson PB; Wang B; Zou H
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():58-67. PubMed ID: 28441570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Brainstem-cortical functional connectivity for speech is differentially challenged by noise and reverberation.
    Bidelman GM; Davis MK; Pridgen MH
    Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():149-160. PubMed ID: 29871826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Construction and evaluation of the Mandarin Chinese matrix (CMNmatrix) sentence test for the assessment of speech recognition in noise.
    Hu H; Xi X; Wong LLN; Hochmuth S; Warzybok A; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Nov; 57(11):838-850. PubMed ID: 30178681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predicting speech intelligibility from EEG in a non-linear classification paradigm
    Accou B; Jalilpour Monesi M; Van Hamme H; Francart T
    J Neural Eng; 2021 Nov; 18(6):. PubMed ID: 34706347
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Delta-band neural envelope tracking predicts speech intelligibility in noise in preschoolers.
    Van Hirtum T; Somers B; Verschueren E; Dieudonné B; Francart T
    Hear Res; 2023 Jul; 434():108785. PubMed ID: 37172414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Auditory models of suprathreshold distortion and speech intelligibility in persons with impaired hearing.
    Bernstein JG; Summers V; Grassi E; Grant KW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):307-28. PubMed ID: 23636211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Distinct roles of delta- and theta-band neural tracking for sharpening and predictive coding of multi-level speech features during spoken language processing.
    Mai G; Wang WS
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2023 Dec; 44(17):6149-6172. PubMed ID: 37818940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development of the Russian matrix sentence test.
    Warzybok A; Zokoll M; Wardenga N; Ozimek E; Boboshko M; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():35-43. PubMed ID: 25843088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prosodic pitch processing is represented in delta-band EEG and is dissociable from the cortical tracking of other acoustic and phonetic features.
    Teoh ES; Cappelloni MS; Lalor EC
    Eur J Neurosci; 2019 Dec; 50(11):3831-3842. PubMed ID: 31287601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Delta, theta, beta, and gamma brain oscillations index levels of auditory sentence processing.
    Mai G; Minett JW; Wang WS
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jun; 133():516-528. PubMed ID: 26931813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of noise type on speech reception thresholds across four languages measured with matrix sentence tests.
    Hochmuth S; Kollmeier B; Brand T; Jürgens T
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():62-70. PubMed ID: 26097982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An Italian matrix sentence test for the evaluation of speech intelligibility in noise.
    Puglisi GE; Warzybok A; Hochmuth S; Visentin C; Astolfi A; Prodi N; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():44-50. PubMed ID: 26371592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Matrix sentence intelligibility prediction using an automatic speech recognition system.
    Schädler MR; Warzybok A; Hochmuth S; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():100-7. PubMed ID: 26383042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing the potential of MEG and EEG to uncover brain tracking of speech temporal envelope.
    Destoky F; Philippe M; Bertels J; Verhasselt M; Coquelet N; Vander Ghinst M; Wens V; De Tiège X; Bourguignon M
    Neuroimage; 2019 Jan; 184():201-213. PubMed ID: 30205208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. General Auditory and Speech-Specific Contributions to Cortical Envelope Tracking Revealed Using Auditory Chimeras.
    Prinsloo KD; Lalor EC
    J Neurosci; 2022 Oct; 42(41):7782-7798. PubMed ID: 36041853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.