These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31167413)

  • 1. Recent Advances in Pipeline Monitoring and Oil Leakage Detection Technologies: Principles and Approaches.
    Adegboye MA; Fung WK; Karnik A
    Sensors (Basel); 2019 Jun; 19(11):. PubMed ID: 31167413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development and Analysis of a Distributed Leak Detection and Localisation System for Crude Oil Pipelines.
    Ahmed S; Le Mouël F; Stouls N; Lipeme Kouyi G
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Apr; 23(9):. PubMed ID: 37177501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Combined Semi-Supervised Deep Learning Method for Oil Leak Detection in Pipelines Using IIoT at the Edge.
    Spandonidis C; Theodoropoulos P; Giannopoulos F
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 May; 22(11):. PubMed ID: 35684726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Constant false alarm rate detection of pipeline leakage based on acoustic sensors.
    An G; Huang Z; Li Y
    Sci Rep; 2023 Aug; 13(1):14149. PubMed ID: 37644105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Failure Detection Methods for Pipeline Networks: From Acoustic Sensing to Cyber-Physical Systems.
    Wong B; McCann JA
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Jul; 21(15):. PubMed ID: 34372194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of Propagation and Distribution Characteristics of Leakage Acoustic Waves in Water Supply Pipelines.
    Li Y; Zhou Y; Fu M; Zhou F; Chi Z; Wang W
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Aug; 21(16):. PubMed ID: 34450892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Water Pipeline Leakage Detection Based on Machine Learning and Wireless Sensor Networks.
    Liu Y; Ma X; Li Y; Tie Y; Zhang Y; Gao J
    Sensors (Basel); 2019 Nov; 19(23):. PubMed ID: 31766356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Based on abnormal fluctuations in user-side flow simulation analysis of low- and medium-pressure gas pipeline leakage monitoring.
    Wang X; Luo Z; Kong Y; Wang Q
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(7):e0270290. PubMed ID: 35877688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An energy-aware and Q-learning-based area coverage for oil pipeline monitoring systems using sensors and Internet of Things.
    Rahmani AM; Ali S; Malik MH; Yousefpoor E; Yousefpoor MS; Mousavi A; Khan F; Hosseinzadeh M
    Sci Rep; 2022 Jun; 12(1):9638. PubMed ID: 35688867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative Study of Leak Detection in PVC Water Pipes Using Ceramic, Polymer, and Surface Acoustic Wave Sensors.
    Hamamed N; Mechri C; Mhammedi T; Yaakoubi N; El Guerjouma R; Bouaziz S; Haddar M
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Sep; 23(18):. PubMed ID: 37765774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Comprehensive Review of Micro-Inertial Measurement Unit Based Intelligent PIG Multi-Sensor Fusion Technologies for Small-Diameter Pipeline Surveying.
    Guan L; Cong X; Zhang Q; Liu F; Gao Y; An W; Noureldin A
    Micromachines (Basel); 2020 Sep; 11(9):. PubMed ID: 32906816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Erratum: Eyestalk Ablation to Increase Ovarian Maturation in Mud Crabs.
    J Vis Exp; 2023 May; (195):. PubMed ID: 37235796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hybrid Encryption Method for Health Monitoring Systems Based on Machine Learning.
    Malmurugan N; Nelson SC; Altuwairiqi M; Alyami H; Gangodkar D; Abdul Zahra MM; Asakipaam SA
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2022; 2022():7348488. PubMed ID: 35845910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A proposed scalable design and simulation of wireless sensor network-based long-distance water pipeline leakage monitoring system.
    Almazyad AS; Seddiq YM; Alotaibi AM; Al-Nasheri AY; BenSaleh MS; Obeid AM; Qasim SM
    Sensors (Basel); 2014 Feb; 14(2):3557-77. PubMed ID: 24561404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pipeline Leakage Detection Using Acoustic Emission and Machine Learning Algorithms.
    Ullah N; Ahmed Z; Kim JM
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Mar; 23(6):. PubMed ID: 36991937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Leak Detection in Water Pipes Using Submersible Optical Optic-Based Pressure Sensor.
    Wong L; Deo R; Rathnayaka S; Shannon B; Zhang C; Chiu WK; Kodikara J; Widyastuti H
    Sensors (Basel); 2018 Nov; 18(12):. PubMed ID: 30513585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Designing a reliable leak bio-detection system for natural gas pipelines.
    Batzias FA; Siontorou CG; Spanidis PM
    J Hazard Mater; 2011 Feb; 186(1):35-58. PubMed ID: 21177031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Experimental study on the leakage temperature field of buried CO
    Liu Z; Xiu Z; Zhao Y; Li M; Li P; Cai P; Liang Y
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Jun; 30(27):70288-70302. PubMed ID: 37148517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Environmental risk of oil pipeline accidents.
    Lu H; Xi D; Qin G
    Sci Total Environ; 2023 May; 874():162386. PubMed ID: 36863588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hierarchical leak detection and localization method in natural gas pipeline monitoring sensor networks.
    Wan J; Yu Y; Wu Y; Feng R; Yu N
    Sensors (Basel); 2012; 12(1):189-214. PubMed ID: 22368464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.