These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31167839)

  • 1. Multiple Negative Regulators Restrict Recruitment of the SWI/SNF Chromatin Remodeler to the
    Parnell EJ; Stillman DJ
    Genetics; 2019 Aug; 212(4):1181-1204. PubMed ID: 31167839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ash1 and Tup1 dependent repression of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae HO promoter requires activator-dependent nucleosome eviction.
    Parnell EJ; Parnell TJ; Yan C; Bai L; Stillman DJ
    PLoS Genet; 2020 Dec; 16(12):e1009133. PubMed ID: 33382702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. SWI/SNF binding to the HO promoter requires histone acetylation and stimulates TATA-binding protein recruitment.
    Mitra D; Parnell EJ; Landon JW; Yu Y; Stillman DJ
    Mol Cell Biol; 2006 Jun; 26(11):4095-110. PubMed ID: 16705163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Repressive chromatin affects factor binding at yeast HO (homothallic switching) promoter.
    Takahata S; Yu Y; Stillman DJ
    J Biol Chem; 2011 Oct; 286(40):34809-19. PubMed ID: 21840992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. FACT and Asf1 regulate nucleosome dynamics and coactivator binding at the HO promoter.
    Takahata S; Yu Y; Stillman DJ
    Mol Cell; 2009 May; 34(4):405-15. PubMed ID: 19481521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. SWI/SNF and Asf1p cooperate to displace histones during induction of the saccharomyces cerevisiae HO promoter.
    Gkikopoulos T; Havas KM; Dewar H; Owen-Hughes T
    Mol Cell Biol; 2009 Aug; 29(15):4057-66. PubMed ID: 19470759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. FACT and Ash1 promote long-range and bidirectional nucleosome eviction at the HO promoter.
    Yu Y; Yarrington RM; Stillman DJ
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2020 Nov; 48(19):10877-10889. PubMed ID: 33010153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stable incorporation of sequence specific repressors Ash1 and Ume6 into the Rpd3L complex.
    Carrozza MJ; Florens L; Swanson SK; Shia WJ; Anderson S; Yates J; Washburn MP; Workman JL
    Biochim Biophys Acta; 2005 Nov; 1731(2):77-87; discussion 75-6. PubMed ID: 16314178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Redundant mechanisms are used by Ssn6-Tup1 in repressing chromosomal gene transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
    Zhang Z; Reese JC
    J Biol Chem; 2004 Sep; 279(38):39240-50. PubMed ID: 15254041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Architectural transcription factors and the SAGA complex function in parallel pathways to activate transcription.
    Yu Y; Eriksson P; Stillman DJ
    Mol Cell Biol; 2000 Apr; 20(7):2350-7. PubMed ID: 10713159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mediator, TATA-binding protein, and RNA polymerase II contribute to low histone occupancy at active gene promoters in yeast.
    Ansari SA; Paul E; Sommer S; Lieleg C; He Q; Daly AZ; Rode KA; Barber WT; Ellis LC; LaPorta E; Orzechowski AM; Taylor E; Reeb T; Wong J; Korber P; Morse RH
    J Biol Chem; 2014 May; 289(21):14981-95. PubMed ID: 24727477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Role of an mSin3A-Swi/Snf chromatin remodeling complex in the feedback repression of bile acid biosynthesis by SHP.
    Kemper JK; Kim H; Miao J; Bhalla S; Bae Y
    Mol Cell Biol; 2004 Sep; 24(17):7707-19. PubMed ID: 15314177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ordered recruitment of transcription and chromatin remodeling factors to a cell cycle- and developmentally regulated promoter.
    Cosma MP; Tanaka T; Nasmyth K
    Cell; 1999 Apr; 97(3):299-311. PubMed ID: 10319811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sas3 and Ada2(Gcn5)-dependent histone H3 acetylation is required for transcription elongation at the de-repressed FLO1 gene.
    Church M; Smith KC; Alhussain MM; Pennings S; Fleming AB
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2017 May; 45(8):4413-4430. PubMed ID: 28115623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tup1-Ssn6 and Swi-Snf remodelling activities influence long-range chromatin organization upstream of the yeast SUC2 gene.
    Fleming AB; Pennings S
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2007; 35(16):5520-31. PubMed ID: 17704134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evidence that Swi/Snf directly represses transcription in S. cerevisiae.
    Martens JA; Winston F
    Genes Dev; 2002 Sep; 16(17):2231-6. PubMed ID: 12208846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cell cycle-regulated histone acetylation required for expression of the yeast HO gene.
    Krebs JE; Kuo MH; Allis CD; Peterson CL
    Genes Dev; 1999 Jun; 13(11):1412-21. PubMed ID: 10364158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Repression by Ume6 involves recruitment of a complex containing Sin3 corepressor and Rpd3 histone deacetylase to target promoters.
    Kadosh D; Struhl K
    Cell; 1997 May; 89(3):365-71. PubMed ID: 9150136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. RPD3 and UME6 are involved in the activation of PDR5 transcription and pleiotropic drug resistance in ρ
    Yamada Y
    BMC Microbiol; 2021 Nov; 21(1):311. PubMed ID: 34753419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Cyc8-Tup1 complex inhibits transcription primarily by masking the activation domain of the recruiting protein.
    Wong KH; Struhl K
    Genes Dev; 2011 Dec; 25(23):2525-39. PubMed ID: 22156212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.