These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31167868)

  • 1. Defining certainty of net benefit: a GRADE concept paper.
    Alper BS; Oettgen P; Kunnamo I; Iorio A; Ansari MT; Murad MH; Meerpohl JJ; Qaseem A; Hultcrantz M; Schünemann HJ; Guyatt G;
    BMJ Open; 2019 Jun; 9(6):e027445. PubMed ID: 31167868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A guide for health professionals to interpret and use recommendations in guidelines developed with the GRADE approach.
    Neumann I; Santesso N; Akl EA; Rind DM; Vandvik PO; Alonso-Coello P; Agoritsas T; Mustafa RA; Alexander PE; Schünemann H; Guyatt GH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Apr; 72():45-55. PubMed ID: 26772609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. UpToDate adherence to GRADE criteria for strong recommendations: an analytical survey.
    Agoritsas T; Merglen A; Heen AF; Kristiansen A; Neumann I; Brito JP; Brignardello-Petersen R; Alexander PE; Rind DM; Vandvik PO; Guyatt GH
    BMJ Open; 2017 Nov; 7(11):e018593. PubMed ID: 29150475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [GRADE guidelines: 14. Going from evidence to recommendations: the significance and presentation of recommendations].
    Kaminski-Hartenthaler A; Meerpohl JJ; Gartlehner G; Kien C; Langer G; Wipplinger J; Schünemann HJ
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2014; 108(7):413-20. PubMed ID: 25444300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evidence-based urology: understanding GRADE methodology.
    Gonzalez-Padilla DA; Dahm P
    Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Nov; 7(6):1230-1233. PubMed ID: 34598913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. No. 367-2019 Canadian Guideline for Physical Activity throughout Pregnancy.
    Mottola MF; Davenport MH; Ruchat SM; Davies GA; Poitras V; Gray C; Jaramillo Garcia A; Barrowman N; Adamo KB; Duggan M; Barakat R; Chilibeck P; Fleming K; Forte M; Korolnek J; Nagpal T; Slater L; Stirling D; Zehr L
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2018 Nov; 40(11):1528-1537. PubMed ID: 30297272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Making the GRADE in anaphylaxis management: Toward recommendations integrating values, preferences, context, and shared decision making.
    Shaker MS; Oppenheimer J; Wallace DV; Golden DBK; Lang DM; ; ; Lang ES; Bernstein JA; Campbell RL; Chu D; Dinakar C; Ellis AK; Greenhawt M; Horner C; Lieberman JA; Rank MA; Stukus DR; Wang J
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2020 Jun; 124(6):526-535.e2. PubMed ID: 32199979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using patient values and preferences to inform the importance of health outcomes in practice guideline development following the GRADE approach.
    Zhang Y; Coello PA; Brożek J; Wiercioch W; Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta I; Akl EA; Meerpohl JJ; Alhazzani W; Carrasco-Labra A; Morgan RL; Mustafa RA; Riva JJ; Moore A; Yepes-Nuñez JJ; Cuello-Garcia C; AlRayees Z; Manja V; Falavigna M; Neumann I; Brignardello-Petersen R; Santesso N; Rochwerg B; Darzi A; Rojas MX; Adi Y; Bollig C; Waziry R; Schünemann HJ
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2017 May; 15(1):52. PubMed ID: 28460638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recommendations from the international evidence-based guideline for the assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome.
    Teede HJ; Misso ML; Costello MF; Dokras A; Laven J; Moran L; Piltonen T; Norman RJ;
    Fertil Steril; 2018 Aug; 110(3):364-379. PubMed ID: 30033227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Integrative assessment of evidence in healthcare: the GRADE system].
    Schünemann H
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2009; 103(5):261-8. PubMed ID: 19645339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [GRADE guidelines 15: going from evidence to recommendation - determinants of a recommendation's direction and strength].
    Nußbaumer B; Gartlehner G; Kien C; Kaminski-Hartenthaler A; Langer G; Meerpohl JJ; Schünemann HJ
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2014; 108(7):421-31. PubMed ID: 25444301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The GRADE approach, Part 2: Evidence to decision frameworksoutlining decision-making in health.
    Quilodrán C; Kirmayr M; Valente B; Pérez-Bracchiglione J; Garegnani L; Franco JVA
    Medwave; 2021 May; 21(4):e8182. PubMed ID: 34086664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines part 3 of 3. The GRADE approach to developing recommendations.
    Brożek JL; Akl EA; Compalati E; Kreis J; Terracciano L; Fiocchi A; Ueffing E; Andrews J; Alonso-Coello P; Meerpohl JJ; Lang DM; Jaeschke R; Williams JW; Phillips B; Lethaby A; Bossuyt P; Glasziou P; Helfand M; Watine J; Afilalo M; Welch V; Montedori A; Abraha I; Horvath AR; Bousquet J; Guyatt GH; Schünemann HJ;
    Allergy; 2011 May; 66(5):588-95. PubMed ID: 21241318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. GRADE guidelines: 14. Going from evidence to recommendations: the significance and presentation of recommendations.
    Andrews J; Guyatt G; Oxman AD; Alderson P; Dahm P; Falck-Ytter Y; Nasser M; Meerpohl J; Post PN; Kunz R; Brozek J; Vist G; Rind D; Akl EA; Schünemann HJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Jul; 66(7):719-25. PubMed ID: 23312392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. GRADE guidelines: 15. Going from evidence to recommendation-determinants of a recommendation's direction and strength.
    Andrews JC; Schünemann HJ; Oxman AD; Pottie K; Meerpohl JJ; Coello PA; Rind D; Montori VM; Brito JP; Norris S; Elbarbary M; Post P; Nasser M; Shukla V; Jaeschke R; Brozek J; Djulbegovic B; Guyatt G
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Jul; 66(7):726-35. PubMed ID: 23570745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. GRADE Guidelines: 19. Assessing the certainty of evidence in the importance of outcomes or values and preferences-Risk of bias and indirectness.
    Zhang Y; Alonso-Coello P; Guyatt GH; Yepes-Nuñez JJ; Akl EA; Hazlewood G; Pardo-Hernandez H; Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta I; Qaseem A; Williams JW; Tugwell P; Flottorp S; Chang Y; Zhang Y; Mustafa RA; Rojas MX; Schünemann HJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Jul; 111():94-104. PubMed ID: 29452223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Clinical guidelines using the GRADE system (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation)].
    Mendoza C; Kraemer P; Herrera P; Burdiles P; Sepúlveda D; Núñez E; Muñoz C; Neumann I
    Rev Med Chil; 2017 Nov; 145(11):1463-1470. PubMed ID: 29664529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interpreting GRADE's levels of certainty or quality of the evidence: GRADE for statisticians, considering review information size or less emphasis on imprecision?
    Schünemann HJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jul; 75():6-15. PubMed ID: 27063205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. GRADE guidelines: 20. Assessing the certainty of evidence in the importance of outcomes or values and preferences-inconsistency, imprecision, and other domains.
    Zhang Y; Coello PA; Guyatt GH; Yepes-Nuñez JJ; Akl EA; Hazlewood G; Pardo-Hernandez H; Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta I; Qaseem A; Williams JW; Tugwell P; Flottorp S; Chang Y; Zhang Y; Mustafa RA; Rojas MX; Xie F; Schünemann HJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Jul; 111():83-93. PubMed ID: 29800687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Primer on Development and Dissemination.
    Murad MH
    Mayo Clin Proc; 2017 Mar; 92(3):423-433. PubMed ID: 28259229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.