221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31168671)
1. Workflow assessment as a preclinical development tool : Surgical process models of three techniques for minimally invasive cochlear implantation.
Müller S; Kahrs LA; Gaa J; Tauscher S; Kluge M; John S; Rau TS; Lenarz T; Ortmaier T; Majdani O
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2019 Aug; 14(8):1389-1401. PubMed ID: 31168671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An image-guided robot system for direct cochlear access.
Bell B; Williamson T; Gerber N; Gavaghan K; Wimmer W; Kompis M; Weber S; Caversaccio M
Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 May; 15 Suppl 1():S11-3. PubMed ID: 24869430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotics, automation, active electrode arrays, and new devices for cochlear implantation: A contemporary review.
De Seta D; Daoudi H; Torres R; Ferrary E; Sterkers O; Nguyen Y
Hear Res; 2022 Feb; 414():108425. PubMed ID: 34979455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robotic Ear Surgery.
Riojas KE; Labadie RF
Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 2020 Dec; 53(6):1065-1075. PubMed ID: 33127040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro accuracy evaluation of image-guided robot system for direct cochlear access.
Bell B; Gerber N; Williamson T; Gavaghan K; Wimmer W; Caversaccio M; Weber S
Otol Neurotol; 2013 Sep; 34(7):1284-90. PubMed ID: 23921934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A manually operated, advance off-stylet insertion tool for minimally invasive cochlear implantation surgery.
Kratchman LB; Schurzig D; McRackan TR; Balachandran R; Noble JH; Webster RJ; Labadie RF
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2012 Oct; 59(10):2792-800. PubMed ID: 22851233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robotic Cochlear Implantation for Direct Cochlear Access.
Caversaccio M; Mantokoudis G; Wagner F; Aebischer P; Weder S; Wimmer W
J Vis Exp; 2022 Jun; (184):. PubMed ID: 35786698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Feasibility of using EMG for early detection of the facial nerve during robotic direct cochlear access.
Ansó J; Stahl C; Gerber N; Williamson T; Gavaghan K; Rösler KM; Caversaccio MD; Weber S; Bell B
Otol Neurotol; 2014 Mar; 35(3):545-54. PubMed ID: 24492132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ex Vivo Evaluation of a Minimally Invasive Approach for Cochlear Implant Surgery.
Rau TS; John S; Kluge M; Repp F; Zuniga MG; Stieghorst J; Timm ME; Frohlich M; Majdani O; Lenarz T
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2023 Jan; 70(1):390-398. PubMed ID: 35939462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mechatronic feasibility of minimally invasive, atraumatic cochleostomy.
Williamson T; Du X; Bell B; Coulson C; Caversaccio M; Proops D; Brett P; Weber S
Biomed Res Int; 2014; 2014():181624. PubMed ID: 25110661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of linear drilling in temporal bone using drill press system for minimally invasive cochlear implantation.
Dillon NP; Balachandran R; Labadie RF
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2016 Mar; 11(3):483-93. PubMed ID: 26183149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Minimally invasive image-guided cochlear implantation for pediatric patients: clinical feasibility study.
Balachandran R; Reda FA; Noble JH; Blachon GS; Dawant BM; Fitzpatrick JM; Labadie RF
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2014 Apr; 150(4):631-7. PubMed ID: 24449796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Temperature Prediction Model for Bone Drilling Based on Density Distribution and In Vivo Experiments for Minimally Invasive Robotic Cochlear Implantation.
Feldmann A; Anso J; Bell B; Williamson T; Gavaghan K; Gerber N; Rohrbach H; Weber S; Zysset P
Ann Biomed Eng; 2016 May; 44(5):1576-86. PubMed ID: 26358479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Population Statistics Approach for Safety Assessment in Robotic Cochlear Implantation.
Williamson T; Gavaghan K; Gerber N; Weder S; Anschuetz L; Wagner F; Weisstanner C; Mantokoudis G; Caversaccio M; Weber S
Otol Neurotol; 2017 Jun; 38(5):759-764. PubMed ID: 28196000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Advances in minimally invasive cochlear implantation].
Sun S; Ma F
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Oct; 29(19):1754-8. PubMed ID: 26999856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robotic cochlear implantation: surgical procedure and first clinical experience.
Caversaccio M; Gavaghan K; Wimmer W; Williamson T; Ansò J; Mantokoudis G; Gerber N; Rathgeb C; Feldmann A; Wagner F; Scheidegger O; Kompis M; Weisstanner C; Zoka-Assadi M; Roesler K; Anschuetz L; Huth M; Weber S
Acta Otolaryngol; 2017 Apr; 137(4):447-454. PubMed ID: 28145157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cadaveric feasibility study of da Vinci Si-assisted cochlear implant with augmented visual navigation for otologic surgery.
Liu WP; Azizian M; Sorger J; Taylor RH; Reilly BK; Cleary K; Preciado D
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2014 Mar; 140(3):208-14. PubMed ID: 24457635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robotics for Cochlear Implantation Surgery: Challenges and Opportunities.
Panara K; Shahal D; Mittal R; Eshraghi AA
Otol Neurotol; 2021 Aug; 42(7):e825-e835. PubMed ID: 33993143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Semiautomatic cochleostomy target and insertion trajectory planning for minimally invasive cochlear implantation.
Wimmer W; Venail F; Williamson T; Akkari M; Gerber N; Weber S; Caversaccio M; Uziel A; Bell B
Biomed Res Int; 2014; 2014():596498. PubMed ID: 25101289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Minimally invasive, multi-port approach to the lateral skull base: a first in vitro evaluation.
Stenin I; Hansen S; Nau-Hermes M; El-Hakimi W; Becker M; Bredemann J; Kristin J; Klenzner T; Schipper J
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2017 May; 12(5):889-895. PubMed ID: 28197759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
