These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31168759)

  • 1. Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials in Response to Frequency Changes with Varied Magnitude, Rate, and Direction.
    Vonck BMD; Lammers MJW; van der Waals M; van Zanten GA; Versnel H
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2019 Oct; 20(5):489-498. PubMed ID: 31168759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Varying effect of noise on sound onset and acoustic change evoked auditory cortical N1 responses evoked by a vowel-vowel stimulus.
    Yaralı M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2020 Jun; 152():36-43. PubMed ID: 32302643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Characterization of cortical auditory evoked potential (P1-N1-P2) in normal hearing young adults].
    Li YL; Liu XH; Fu XX; Qi BE
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Feb; 31(4):262-266. PubMed ID: 29871239
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. EEG signatures of auditory activity correlate with simultaneously recorded fMRI responses in humans.
    Mayhew SD; Dirckx SG; Niazy RK; Iannetti GD; Wise RG
    Neuroimage; 2010 Jan; 49(1):849-64. PubMed ID: 19591945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cortical potentials evoked by tone frequency changes can predict speech perception in noise.
    Vonck BMD; van Heteren JAA; Lammers MJW; de Jel DVC; Schaake WAA; van Zanten GA; Stokroos RJ; Versnel H
    Hear Res; 2022 Jul; 420():108508. PubMed ID: 35477512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Informational Masking Effects on Neural Encoding of Stimulus Onset and Acoustic Change.
    Niemczak CE; Vander Werff KR
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):156-167. PubMed ID: 29782442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A novel type of auditory responses: temporal dynamics of 40-Hz steady-state responses induced by changes in sound localization.
    Ross B
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Sep; 100(3):1265-77. PubMed ID: 18632891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cortical auditory evoked potentials in cochlear implant listeners via single electrode stimulation in relation to speech perception.
    Liebscher T; Alberter K; Hoppe U
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Dec; 57(12):933-940. PubMed ID: 30295156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Deconvolution of overlapping cortical auditory evoked potentials recorded using short stimulus onset-asynchrony ranges.
    Bardy F; Van Dun B; Dillon H; McMahon CM
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2014 Apr; 125(4):814-826. PubMed ID: 24269614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of Consonant Duration on Formation of Consonant-Vowel Syllable Evoked Auditory Cortical Potentials.
    Yaralı M; Yağcıoğlu S
    J Int Adv Otol; 2018 Apr; 14(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 29092801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials Recorded From Nucleus Hybrid Cochlear Implant Users.
    Brown CJ; Jeon EK; Chiou LK; Kirby B; Karsten SA; Turner CW; Abbas PJ
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):723-32. PubMed ID: 26295607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Auditory-evoked potentials to frequency increase and decrease of high- and low-frequency tones.
    Pratt H; Starr A; Michalewski HJ; Dimitrijevic A; Bleich N; Mittelman N
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Feb; 120(2):360-73. PubMed ID: 19070543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auditory cortical activity to different voice onset times in cochlear implant users.
    Han JH; Zhang F; Kadis DS; Houston LM; Samy RN; Smith ML; Dimitrijevic A
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Feb; 127(2):1603-1617. PubMed ID: 26616545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of temporal stimulus changes on speech-evoked potentials revealed by approximations of tone-evoked waveforms.
    Burger M; Hoppe U; Lohscheller J; Eysholdt U; Döllinger M
    Ear Hear; 2009 Feb; 30(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 19050643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of changes in stimulus level on electrically evoked cortical auditory potentials.
    Kim JR; Brown CJ; Abbas PJ; Etler CP; O'Brien S
    Ear Hear; 2009 Jun; 30(3):320-9. PubMed ID: 19322089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Age-related differences in sensitivity to small changes in frequency assessed with cortical evoked potentials.
    Harris KC; Mills JH; He NJ; Dubno JR
    Hear Res; 2008 Sep; 243(1-2):47-56. PubMed ID: 18597958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of stimulus frequency and complexity on the mismatch negativity and other components of the cortical auditory-evoked potential.
    Wunderlich JL; Cone-Wesson BK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Apr; 109(4):1526-37. PubMed ID: 11325124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Infant Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials to Lateralized Noise Shifts Produced by Changes in Interaural Time Difference.
    Small SA; Ishida IM; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 27505221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does the ACC have potential as an index of early speech discrimination ability? A preliminary study in 4-month-old infants with normal hearing.
    Small SA; Werker JF
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(6):e59-69. PubMed ID: 22785572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.