These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31168984)
1. [Accuracy of three-dimensional camera system based on stereophotography on photographic acquisition of deformity facial images]. Gao PC; Zhao ZQ; Chen YL; Zhao Y; Xie LZ; Yan B; Wang L Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Apr; 37(2):174-179. PubMed ID: 31168984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Evaluation of measurement accuracy of three facial scanners based on different scanning principles]. Zhao YJ; Xiong YX; Yang HF; Wang Y Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2014 Feb; 46(1):76-80. PubMed ID: 24535353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Facial Scan for Facial Deformities in Clinics: A New Evaluation Method for Facial Scanner Accuracy. Zhao YJ; Xiong YX; Wang Y PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0169402. PubMed ID: 28056044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of three-dimensional photogrammetry and cone beam computed tomography based on linear measurements in patients with facial deformities. Zhao Z; Xie L; Cao D; Izadikhah I; Gao P; Zhao Y; Yan B Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2021 Feb; 50(2):20200001. PubMed ID: 32791014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Quantitative analysis of craniofacial skeleton asymmetry by three-dimensional computed tomography]. Wang RC; Li GZ; Liu CM; Jia CY; Gao QW; Han Y Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Nov; 29(6):435-9. PubMed ID: 24624882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of a 3D digital photographic imaging system of the human face. Kimoto K; Garrett NR J Oral Rehabil; 2007 Mar; 34(3):201-5. PubMed ID: 17302948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Volumetric evaluation of facial swelling utilizing a 3-D range camera. Yip E; Smith A; Yoshino M Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Mar; 33(2):179-82. PubMed ID: 15050075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantitative analysis of velopharyngeal movement using a stereoendoscope: accuracy and reliability of range images. Nakano A; Mishima K; Shiraishi R; Ueyama Y Comput Aided Surg; 2015; 20(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 26290052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence of involuntary facial movements on craniofacial anthropometry: a survey using a three-dimensional photographic system. Lübbers HT; Medinger L; Kruse AL; Grätz KW; Obwegeser JA; Matthews F Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Mar; 50(2):171-5. PubMed ID: 21236527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of 3-dimensional spinal reconstruction accuracy: biplanar radiographs with EOS versus computed tomography. Glaser DA; Doan J; Newton PO Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jul; 37(16):1391-7. PubMed ID: 22415001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reliability of a three-dimensional facial camera for dental and medical applications: A pilot study. Liu S; Srinivasan M; Mörzinger R; Lancelle M; Beeler T; Gross M; Solenthaler B; Fehmer V; Sailer I J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Sep; 122(3):282-287. PubMed ID: 30948294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-Dimensional Photography for Quantitative Assessment of Penile Volume-Loss Deformities in Peyronie's Disease. Margolin EJ; Mlynarczyk CM; Mulhall JP; Stember DS; Stahl PJ J Sex Med; 2017 Jun; 14(6):829-833. PubMed ID: 28460995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative Accuracy of Facial Models Fabricated Using Traditional and 3D Imaging Techniques. Lincoln KP; Sun AY; Prihoda TJ; Sutton AJ J Prosthodont; 2016 Apr; 25(3):207-15. PubMed ID: 26381058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison study of different facial soft tissue analysis methods. Kook MS; Jung S; Park HJ; Oh HK; Ryu SY; Cho JH; Lee JS; Yoon SJ; Kim MS; Shin HK J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):648-56. PubMed ID: 24954528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability and accuracy of cone beam computed tomography versus conventional multidetector computed tomography for image-guided craniofacial implant planning: An in vitro study. Dings JP; Verhamme L; Merkx MA; Xi T; Meijer GJ; Maal TJ Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(3):665–672. PubMed ID: 30934042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Feasibility and Accuracy of Noncontact Three-Dimensional Digitizers for Geometric Facial Defects: An In Vitro Comparison. Aswehlee AM; Elbashti ME; Hattori M; Sumita YI; Taniguchi H Int J Prosthodont; 2018; 31(6):601–606. PubMed ID: 30339162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy and reliability of digital craniofacial measurements using a small-format, handheld 3D camera. Kim AJ; Gu D; Chandiramani R; Linjawi I; Deutsch ICK; Allareddy V; Masoud MI Orthod Craniofac Res; 2018 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 29863289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Image fusion in craniofacial virtual reality modeling based on CT and 3dMD photogrammetry. Xin P; Yu H; Cheng H; Shen S; Shen SG J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Sep; 24(5):1573-6. PubMed ID: 24036729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation and reproducibility of a high-resolution three-dimensional facial imaging system. Khambay B; Nairn N; Bell A; Miller J; Bowman A; Ayoub AF Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jan; 46(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 17561318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three-dimensional photographic analysis of outcome after helmet treatment of a nonsynostotic cranial deformity. Schaaf H; Malik CY; Streckbein P; Pons-Kuehnemann J; Howaldt HP; Wilbrand JF J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Nov; 21(6):1677-82. PubMed ID: 21119399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]