BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31169089)

  • 1. Effect of automatic cluster remover settings on milkability, milk quality and milking irregularities of crossbred cows.
    Fahim A; Kamboj ML; Sirohi AS; Bhakat M; Mohanty TK
    J Dairy Res; 2019 May; 86(2):196-200. PubMed ID: 31169089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A randomized trial to study the effect of automatic cluster remover settings on milking performance, teat condition, and udder health.
    Wieland M; Nydam DV; Heuwieser W; Morrill KM; Ferlito L; Watters RD; Virkler PD
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Apr; 103(4):3668-3682. PubMed ID: 32008782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Short-term application of prestimulation and increased automatic cluster remover threshold affect milking characteristics of grazing dairy cows in late lactation.
    Edwards JP; Jago JG; Lopez-Villalobos N
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Mar; 96(3):1886-93. PubMed ID: 23332836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of automatic cluster remover settings on production, udder health, and milking duration.
    Jago JG; Burke JL; Williamson JH
    J Dairy Sci; 2010 Jun; 93(6):2541-9. PubMed ID: 20494162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Milking efficiency for grazing dairy cows can be improved by increasing automatic cluster remover thresholds without applying premilking stimulation.
    Edwards JP; Jago JG; Lopez-Villalobos N
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Jun; 96(6):3766-73. PubMed ID: 23567056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automatic cluster remover setting affects milk yield and machine-on time in dairy cows.
    Magliaro AL; Kensinger RS
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 Jan; 88(1):148-53. PubMed ID: 15591377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Different vacuum levels, vacuum reduction during low milk flow, and different cluster detachment levels affect milking performance and teat condition in dairy cows.
    Stauffer C; Feierabend M; Bruckmaier RM
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Oct; 103(10):9250-9260. PubMed ID: 32747105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of automatic cluster remover settings on average milking duration, milk flow, and milk yield.
    Stewart S; Godden S; Rapnicki P; Reid D; Johnson A; Eicker S
    J Dairy Sci; 2002 Apr; 85(4):818-23. PubMed ID: 12018428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of automatic cluster removers on milking efficiency and teat condition of Manchega ewes.
    Bueso-Ródenas J; Romero G; Arias R; Rodríguez AM; Díaz JR
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 Jun; 98(6):3887-95. PubMed ID: 25841960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Vacuum levels and milk-flow-dependent vacuum drops affect machine milking performance and teat condition in dairy cows.
    Besier J; Bruckmaier RM
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Apr; 99(4):3096-3102. PubMed ID: 26830741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of manual and mechanical stimulation on oxytocin release and milking characteristics in Holstein cows milked 3 times daily.
    Watters RD; Bruckmaier RM; Crawford HM; Schuring N; Schukken YH; Galton DM
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 Mar; 98(3):1721-9. PubMed ID: 25582591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Short communication: Effects of changing teatcup removal and vacuum settings on milking efficiency of an automatic milking system.
    Upton J; Bolona PS; Reinemann DJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Nov; 102(11):10500-10505. PubMed ID: 31447160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is the temperament of crossbred dairy cows related to milk cortisol and oxytocin concentrations, milk yield, and quality?
    Marçal-Pedroza MG; Campos MM; Martins MF; Silva MVB; Paranhos da Costa MJR; Negrão JA; Sant'Anna AC
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(6):e0286466. PubMed ID: 37262031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Review: Milking routines and cluster detachment levels in small ruminants.
    Dzidic A; Rovai M; Poulet JL; Leclerc M; Marnet PG
    Animal; 2019 Jul; 13(S1):s86-s93. PubMed ID: 31280744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The milking machine as a cause of severe agitation in cows (and the farmer) during milking].
    Laevens H; Janssens A; de Kruif A; de Meulemeester L; Vandermeersch R
    Tijdschr Diergeneeskd; 1994 Sep; 119(17):495-9. PubMed ID: 7940464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of pulsation ratio on teat condition, milk somatic cell count and productivity in dairy cows in automatic milking.
    Ferneborg S; Svennersten-Sjaunja K
    J Dairy Res; 2015 Nov; 82(4):453-9. PubMed ID: 26411595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reduced liner-open phase and vacuum instead of prestimulation increase parlor efficiency in dairy cows.
    Tuor M; Jenni B; Wellnitz O; Bruckmaier RM
    J Dairy Sci; 2022 Feb; 105(2):1533-1541. PubMed ID: 34955277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of milk flow rate switch-point settings on cow comfort and milking duration.
    Upton J; Browne M; Silva Bolona P
    J Dairy Sci; 2023 Apr; 106(4):2438-2448. PubMed ID: 36870830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of teatcup removal settings on milking efficiency and milk quality in a pasture-based automatic milking system.
    Silva Boloña P; Reinemann DJ; Upton J
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Sep; 102(9):8423-8430. PubMed ID: 31326171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genetic analyses of novel temperament and milkability traits in Norwegian Red cattle based on data from automatic milking systems.
    Wethal KB; Heringstad B
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Sep; 102(9):8221-8233. PubMed ID: 31279559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.