These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31169401)

  • 1. Gaze data reveal individual differences in relational representation processes.
    Zonca J; Coricelli G; Polonio L
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Feb; 46(2):257-279. PubMed ID: 31169401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relational rule discovery in complex discrimination learning.
    Don HJ; Goldwater MB; Greenaway JK; Hutchings R; Livesey EJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Oct; 46(10):1807-1827. PubMed ID: 32364402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How the inference of hierarchical rules unfolds over time.
    Eckstein MK; Starr A; Bunge SA
    Cognition; 2019 Apr; 185():151-162. PubMed ID: 30711815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Individual differences in baseline oculometrics: Examining variation in baseline pupil diameter, spontaneous eye blink rate, and fixation stability.
    Unsworth N; Robison MK; Miller AL
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2019 Aug; 19(4):1074-1093. PubMed ID: 30888645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Recognition of incidentally learned visual search arrays is supported by fixational eye movements.
    Annac E; Pointner M; Khader PH; Müller HJ; Zang X; Geyer T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Dec; 45(12):2147-2164. PubMed ID: 30883169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Eye movements provide insight into individual differences in children's analogical reasoning strategies.
    Starr A; Vendetti MS; Bunge SA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 May; 186():18-26. PubMed ID: 29669270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Individual differences in relational reasoning.
    Gray ME; Holyoak KJ
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Jan; 48(1):96-110. PubMed ID: 31317394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Children as Investigators of Brunerian "Possible Worlds". The Role of Narrative Scenarios in children's Argumentative Thinking.
    Iannaccone A; Perret-Clermont AN; Convertini J
    Integr Psychol Behav Sci; 2019 Dec; 53(4):679-693. PubMed ID: 31729627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relational discovery in category learning.
    Goldwater MB; Don HJ; Krusche MJF; Livesey EJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2018 Jan; 147(1):1-35. PubMed ID: 29309195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cone of gaze in positive schizotypy: Relationship to referential thinking and social functioning.
    Wastler HM; Lenzenweger MF
    Personal Disord; 2018 Jul; 9(4):324-332. PubMed ID: 28627901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Beyond shared signals: The role of downward gaze in the stereotypical representation of sad facial expressions.
    Semyonov O; Ziv-El A; Krumhuber EG; Karasik S; Aviezer H
    Emotion; 2021 Mar; 21(2):247-259. PubMed ID: 31886681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Infants' responses to interactive gaze-contingent faces in a novel and naturalistic eye-tracking paradigm.
    Keemink JR; Keshavarzi-Pour MJ; Kelly DJ
    Dev Psychol; 2019 Jul; 55(7):1362-1371. PubMed ID: 31058524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Seeing eye-to-eye: Social gaze interactions influence gaze direction identification.
    Edwards SG; Bayliss AP
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Nov; 81(8):2755-2765. PubMed ID: 31309531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A model of event knowledge.
    Elman JL; McRae K
    Psychol Rev; 2019 Mar; 126(2):252-291. PubMed ID: 30702315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Gaze bias differences capture individual choice behaviour.
    Thomas AW; Molter F; Krajbich I; Heekeren HR; Mohr PNC
    Nat Hum Behav; 2019 Jun; 3(6):625-635. PubMed ID: 30988476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reasoning strategies explain individual differences in social reasoning.
    Gagnon-St-Pierre É; Doucerain MM; Markovits H
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 Feb; 150(2):340-353. PubMed ID: 32897098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The phonological form of lexical items modulates the encoding of challenging second-language sound contrasts.
    Llompart M; Reinisch E
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Aug; 46(8):1590-1610. PubMed ID: 32162959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Scan patterns during real-world scene viewing predict individual differences in cognitive capacity.
    Hayes TR; Henderson JM
    J Vis; 2017 May; 17(5):23. PubMed ID: 28564687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of arousal and eye gaze direction on trust evaluations of stranger's faces: A potential pathway to paranoid thinking.
    Abbott J; Middlemiss M; Bruce V; Smailes D; Dudley R
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2018 Sep; 60():29-36. PubMed ID: 29510264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Social antecedents and perceptual consequences of how we look at others.
    Fincher KM
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Jan; 148(1):143-157. PubMed ID: 30596442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.