157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31169669)
1. Comparison of hand-sewn versus mechanical esophagogastric anastomosis in esophageal cancer: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wang Y; Zhang X; Jiang Y; Ma G; Wang Z; Xue X; Sang S; Zhang L
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Jun; 98(23):e15676. PubMed ID: 31169669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hand-sewn versus stapler esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal ressection: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Castro PM; Ribeiro FP; Rocha Ade F; Mazzurana M; Alvarez GA
Arq Bras Cir Dig; 2014; 27(3):216-21. PubMed ID: 25184776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hand-sewn vs linearly stapled esophagogastric anastomosis for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.
Deng XF; Liu QX; Zhou D; Min JX; Dai JG
World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Apr; 21(15):4757-64. PubMed ID: 25914488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of end-to-side hand-sewn and side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis in patients with lower thoracic esophageal cancer undergoing transhiatal esophagectomy: an Iranian retrospective cohort study.
Rasihashemi SZ; Ramouz A; Beheshtirouy S; Amini H
BMC Gastroenterol; 2020 Jul; 20(1):250. PubMed ID: 32736599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Propensity-matched analysis of three techniques for intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis.
Blackmon SH; Correa AM; Wynn B; Hofstetter WL; Martin LW; Mehran RJ; Rice DC; Swisher SG; Walsh GL; Roth JA; Vaporciyan AA
Ann Thorac Surg; 2007 May; 83(5):1805-13; discussion 1813. PubMed ID: 17462404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of two different mechanical esophagogastric anastomosis in esophageal cancer patients: a meta-analysis.
Zhou D; Liu QX; Deng XF; Min JX; Dai JG
J Cardiothorac Surg; 2015 May; 10():67. PubMed ID: 25952323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Meta-Analysis of Two Different Methods for Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis: Triangulating Versus Circular Stapling.
Hua XY; Dong SY; Zhang SG
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2020 Nov; 30(11):1143-1149. PubMed ID: 32315563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A prospective randomized controlled trial of semi-mechanical versus hand-sewn or circular stapled esophagogastrostomy for prevention of anastomotic stricture.
Wang WP; Gao Q; Wang KN; Shi H; Chen LQ
World J Surg; 2013 May; 37(5):1043-50. PubMed ID: 23381675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of manual and mechanical cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
Hsu HH; Chen JS; Huang PM; Lee JM; Lee YC
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Jun; 25(6):1097-101. PubMed ID: 15145015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled in esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective randomized study.
Luechakiettisak P; Kasetsunthorn S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 May; 91(5):681-5. PubMed ID: 18672632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hand-sewn versus stapled oesophago-gastric anastomosis: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Markar SR; Karthikesalingam A; Vyas S; Hashemi M; Winslet M
J Gastrointest Surg; 2011 May; 15(5):876-84. PubMed ID: 21271360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Handsewn or stapled esophagogastric anastomoses after esophagectomy for cancer: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Urschel JD; Blewett CJ; Bennett WF; Miller JD; Young JE
Dis Esophagus; 2001; 14(3-4):212-7. PubMed ID: 11869322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
Law S; Fok M; Chu KM; Wong J
Ann Surg; 1997 Aug; 226(2):169-73. PubMed ID: 9296510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. End-to-end versus end-to-side esophagogastrostomy after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective randomized study.
Nederlof N; Tilanus HW; Tran TC; Hop WC; Wijnhoven BP; de Jonge J
Ann Surg; 2011 Aug; 254(2):226-33. PubMed ID: 21725230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Utility of total mechanical stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy: a comparison to conventional anastomotic techniques.
Santos RS; Raftopoulos Y; Singh D; DeHoyos A; Fernando HC; Keenan RJ; Luketich JD; Landreneau RJ
Surgery; 2004 Oct; 136(4):917-25. PubMed ID: 15467679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Manual versus mechanical esophagogastric anastomosis after resection for carcinoma: a controlled trial. French Associations for Surgical Research.
Valverde A; Hay JM; Fingerhut A; Elhadad A
Surgery; 1996 Sep; 120(3):476-83. PubMed ID: 8784400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A single-layer, continuous, hand-sewn method for esophageal anastomosis: prospective evaluation in 218 patients.
Law S; Suen DT; Wong KH; Kwok KF; Wong J
Arch Surg; 2005 Jan; 140(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 15655203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Functional and menometric study of side-to-side stapled anastomosis and traditional hand-sewn anastomosis in cervical esophagogastrostomy.
Deng B; Wang RW; Jiang YG; Tan QY; Zhao YP; Zhou JH; Liao XL; Ma Z
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Jan; 35(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 18848461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Triangulating stapling vs functional end-to-end stapling for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Tsuji T; Ojima T; Nakamori M; Nakamura M; Katsuda M; Hayata K; Kitadani J; Maruoka S; Shimokawa T; Yamaue H
Trials; 2019 Jan; 20(1):83. PubMed ID: 30691515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Modified Double-Layer Anastomosis for Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: An Effective Way to Prevent Leakage and Stricture.
Yuan Y; Zeng XX; Zhao YF; Chen LQ
World J Surg; 2017 Dec; 41(12):3164-3170. PubMed ID: 28721567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
