232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31169730)
1. Quality of life in patients who undergo conventional or robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy: Protocol for a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
Rodrigues RC; Rodrigues MRK; Freitas NO; Rudge MVC; Lima SAM
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Jun; 98(23):e15974. PubMed ID: 31169730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis.
Medical Advisory Secretariat
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(27):1-118. PubMed ID: 23074405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Benign Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.
Albright BB; Witte T; Tofte AN; Chou J; Black JD; Desai VB; Erekson EA
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016 Jan; 23(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 26272688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Incidence and Prevention of Vaginal Cuff Dehiscence after Laparoscopic and Robotic Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Uccella S; Zorzato PC; Kho RM
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Mar; 28(3):710-720. PubMed ID: 33348012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial.
Mäenpää MM; Nieminen K; Tomás EI; Laurila M; Luukkaala TH; Mäenpää JU
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):588.e1-588.e7. PubMed ID: 27288987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robotic-assisted benign hysterectomy compared with laparoscopic, vaginal, and open surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lenfant L; Canlorbe G; Belghiti J; Kreaden US; Hebert AE; Nikpayam M; Uzan C; Azaïs H
J Robot Surg; 2023 Dec; 17(6):2647-2662. PubMed ID: 37856058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A randomized prospective trial of the postoperative quality of life between laparoscopic uterine artery ligation and laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy for the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids: clinical trial design.
Kim HS; Kim JW; Kim MK; Chung HH; Lee TS; Jeon YT; Kim YB; Jeon HW; Yun YH; Park NH; Song YS; Kang SB
Trials; 2009 Jan; 10():8. PubMed ID: 19178748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of quality of life, body image and surgical outcomes of robotic total laparoscopic hysterectomy and sentinel lymph node mapping in low-risk endometrial cancer patients - A Robotic Gyne Club study.
Mereu L; Berlanda V; Surico D; Gardella B; Pertile R; Spinillo A; Tateo S
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2020 Sep; 99(9):1238-1245. PubMed ID: 32170875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of quality of life after robotic-transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery and robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Imai K; Suzuki Y; Hiiragi K; Hotta Y; Shigeta H
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 Sep; 288():211-215. PubMed ID: 37572450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Pain: A Meta-Analysis.
Shin JH; Balk EM; Gritsenko K; Wang A; Plewniak K; Shaparin N
JSLS; 2020; 24(2):. PubMed ID: 32518477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.
Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A systematic review and cost analysis of robot-assisted hysterectomy in malignant and benign conditions.
Tapper AM; Hannola M; Zeitlin R; Isojärvi J; Sintonen H; Ikonen TS
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Jun; 177():1-10. PubMed ID: 24703710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A randomized trial comparing vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomy vs robot-assisted hysterectomy.
Lönnerfors C; Reynisson P; Persson J
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015 Jan; 22(1):78-86. PubMed ID: 25045857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A randomized trial comparing conventional and robotically assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Paraiso MF; Ridgeway B; Park AJ; Jelovsek JE; Barber MD; Falcone T; Einarsson JI
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 May; 208(5):368.e1-7. PubMed ID: 23395927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mortality Rates in Benign Laparoscopic and Robotic Gynecologic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Behbehani S; Suarez-Salvador E; Buras M; Magtibay P; Magrina J
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(3):603-612.e1. PubMed ID: 31627007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robotic compared with conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial.
Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; von Felten S; Schär G
Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Sep; 120(3):604-11. PubMed ID: 22914470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is total laparoscopic hysterectomy with longer operative time associated with a decreased benefit compared with total abdominal hysterectomy?
Chakraborty N; Rhodes S; Luchristt D; Bretschneider CE; Sheyn D
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Feb; 228(2):205.e1-205.e12. PubMed ID: 36202231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Infectious complications of laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomy: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
Marra AR; Puig-Asensio M; Edmond MB; Schweizer ML; Bender D
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Mar; 29(3):518-530. PubMed ID: 30833440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Systematic review and meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials comparing gynecologic laparoscopic procedures with and without robotic assistance.
Marchand G; Taher Masoud A; Ware K; Govindan M; King A; Ruther S; Brazil G; Calteux N; Coriell C; Ulibarri H; Parise J; Arroyo A; Filippelli C; Loli H; Sainz K
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Oct; 265():30-38. PubMed ID: 34418694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robotic surgery for benign gynaecological disease.
Liu H; Lu D; Wang L; Shi G; Song H; Clarke J
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Feb; (2):CD008978. PubMed ID: 22336855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
