These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31170349)

  • 41. The neural correlates of strategic reading comprehension: cognitive control and discourse comprehension.
    Moss J; Schunn CD; Schneider W; McNamara DS; Vanlehn K
    Neuroimage; 2011 Sep; 58(2):675-86. PubMed ID: 21741484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Text skimming: the process and effectiveness of foraging through text under time pressure.
    Duggan GB; Payne SJ
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Sep; 15(3):228-42. PubMed ID: 19751073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. An analysis of the reading strategies used by adult and student deaf readers.
    Banner A; Wang Y
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2011; 16(1):2-23. PubMed ID: 20591840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Mind wandering, together with test anxiety and self-efficacy, predicts student's academic self-concept but not reading comprehension skills.
    Desideri L; Ottaviani C; Cecchetto C; Bonifacci P
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2019 Jun; 89(2):307-323. PubMed ID: 30039857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Adults with mild intellectual disabilities: can their reading comprehension ability be improved?
    van den Bos KP; Nakken H; Nicolay PG; van Houten EJ
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2007 Nov; 51(Pt 11):835-49. PubMed ID: 17910536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Accuracy of student performance while reading leveled books rated at their instructional level by a reading inventory.
    Burns MK; Pulles SM; Maki KE; Kanive R; Hodgson J; Helman LA; McComas JJ; Preast JL
    J Sch Psychol; 2015 Dec; 53(6):437-45. PubMed ID: 26563597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The effects of generating examples on comprehension and metacomprehension.
    Guerrero TA; Griffin TD; Wiley J
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2024 Jun; 30(2):318-330. PubMed ID: 37668581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The effects of question previewing on response accuracy and text processing: An eye-movement study.
    Moss C; Ardoin SP; Mellott JA; Binder KS
    J Sch Psychol; 2024 Jun; 104():101313. PubMed ID: 38871407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Text comprehension, memory, and learning.
    Kintsch W
    Am Psychol; 1994 Apr; 49(4):294-303. PubMed ID: 8203801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Levels of Reading Comprehension Across Text Types: A Comparison of Literal and Inferential Comprehension of Expository and Narrative Texts in Iranian EFL Learners.
    Saadatnia M; Ketabi S; Tavakoli M
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2017 Oct; 46(5):1087-1099. PubMed ID: 28251455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Effectiveness of a Partial Read-Aloud Test Accommodation to Assess Reading Comprehension in Students With a Reading Disability.
    Giusto M; Ehri LC
    J Learn Disabil; 2019; 52(3):259-270. PubMed ID: 30035685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Syntactic markers in the oral retelling of dyslexic students.
    Kida Ade S; Ávila CR; Capellini SA
    Codas; 2015; 27(6):557-64. PubMed ID: 26691620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The Role of Metacognitive Reading Strategies, Metacognitive Study and Learning Strategies, and Behavioral Study and Learning Strategies in Predicting Academic Success in Students With and Without a History of Reading Difficulties.
    Chevalier TM; Parrila R; Ritchie KC; Deacon SH
    J Learn Disabil; 2017 Jan; 50(1):34-48. PubMed ID: 26025926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Presence and place of main ideas and examples in study texts.
    Beishuizen J; Asscher J; Prinsen F; Elshout-Mohr M
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2003 Sep; 73(Pt 3):291-316. PubMed ID: 14672145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Assessing the format of the presentation of text in developing a Reading Strategy Assessment Tool (R-SAT).
    Gilliam S; Magliano JP; Millis KK; Levinstein I; Boonthum C
    Behav Res Methods; 2007 May; 39(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 17695345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Using texts in science education: cognitive processes and knowledge representation.
    van den Broek P
    Science; 2010 Apr; 328(5977):453-6. PubMed ID: 20413489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. New algorithms assessing short summaries in expository texts using latent semantic analysis.
    Olmos R; León JA; Jorge-Botana G; Escudero I
    Behav Res Methods; 2009 Aug; 41(3):944-50. PubMed ID: 19587211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. An evaluation of reading comprehension of expository text in adults with traumatic brain injury.
    Sohlberg MM; Griffiths GG; Fickas S
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2014 May; 23(2):160-75. PubMed ID: 24687229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. EFL Learners' Levels of Comprehension Across Text Structures: A Comparison of Literal and Inferential Comprehension of Descriptive and Enumerative Expository Texts.
    Saadatnia M; Ketabi S; Tavakoli M
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2016 Dec; 45(6):1499-1513. PubMed ID: 26911991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Why Sketching May Aid Learning From Science Texts: Contrasting Sketching With Written Explanations.
    Scheiter K; Schleinschok K; Ainsworth S
    Top Cogn Sci; 2017 Oct; 9(4):866-882. PubMed ID: 28328077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.