131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31170373)
1. AN ANALYSIS OF THE QUALITY OF THYROID CANCER WEBSITES.
Chang KL; Grubbs EG; Ingledew PA
Endocr Pract; 2019 Oct; 25(10):1003-1011. PubMed ID: 31170373
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis of the quality of meningioma education resources available on the Internet.
Lim CA; Ingledew PA
Neurooncol Pract; 2021 Apr; 8(2):129-136. PubMed ID: 35112670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quality of Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) Resources Available on the Internet.
Yang F; Ingledew PA
J Cancer Educ; 2022 Dec; 37(6):1598-1605. PubMed ID: 33770375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Past and Present of Breast Cancer Resources: A Re-evaluation of the Quality of Online Resources After Eight Years.
Killow V; Lin J; Ingledew PA
Cureus; 2022 Aug; 14(8):e28120. PubMed ID: 36134068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An evaluation of the readability, quality, and accuracy of online health information regarding the treatment of hypospadias.
Cisu TI; Mingin GC; Baskin LS
J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Feb; 15(1):40.e1-40.e6. PubMed ID: 30449679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quality of Online Resources for Pancreatic Cancer Patients.
De Groot L; Harris I; Regehr G; Tekian A; Ingledew PA
J Cancer Educ; 2019 Apr; 34(2):223-228. PubMed ID: 29047015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An Evaluation of the Quality of COVID-19 Internet Resources for Cancer Patients.
Jin R; Simmons C; Lim HJ; Ingledew PA
J Cancer Educ; 2023 Jun; 38(3):763-771. PubMed ID: 35726079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Digesting the Contents: an Analysis of Online Colorectal Cancer Education Websites.
Wang L; Gusnowski EM; Ingledew PA
J Cancer Educ; 2022 Apr; 37(2):263-273. PubMed ID: 32902788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Assessment of Quality, Accuracy, and Readability of Online Educational Resources for Platelet-Rich Plasma.
Ghodasra JH; Wang D; Jayakar RG; Jensen AR; Yamaguchi KT; Hegde VV; Jones KJ
Arthroscopy; 2018 Jan; 34(1):272-278. PubMed ID: 28784239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A fountain of knowledge? The quality of online resources for testicular cancer patients.
Yeo S; Eigl B; Ingledew PA
Can Urol Assoc J; 2020 Aug; 14(8):E363-E368. PubMed ID: 32209216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quality Assessment of Online Resources for the Most Common Cancers.
Li JZH; Kong T; Killow V; Wang L; Kobes K; Tekian A; Ingledew PA
J Cancer Educ; 2023 Feb; 38(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 34365589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the Quality of Online Information for Patients with Rare Cancers: Thyroid Cancer.
Kuenzel U; Monga Sindeu T; Schroth S; Huebner J; Herth N
J Cancer Educ; 2018 Oct; 33(5):960-966. PubMed ID: 28120139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quality of Online Information Regarding Cervical Cancer.
Dawson JQ; Davies JM; Ingledew PA
Cureus; 2020 Aug; 12(8):e9511. PubMed ID: 32879831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating the Quality, Content, and Readability of Online Resources for Failed Back Spinal Surgery.
Guo WJ; Wang WK; Xu D; Qiao Z; Shi YL; Luo P
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Apr; 44(7):494-502. PubMed ID: 30234809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Systematic Assessment of Google Search Queries and Readability of Online Gynecologic Oncology Patient Education Materials.
Martin A; Stewart JR; Gaskins J; Medlin E
J Cancer Educ; 2019 Jun; 34(3):435-440. PubMed ID: 29353371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing the readability, quality and accuracy of online health information for patients with low anterior resection syndrome following surgery for rectal cancer.
Garfinkle R; Wong-Chong N; Petrucci A; Sylla P; Wexner SD; Bhatnagar S; Morin N; Boutros M
Colorectal Dis; 2019 May; 21(5):523-531. PubMed ID: 30609222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Internet-Based Resources Frequently Provide Inaccurate and Out-of-Date Recommendations on Preoperative Fasting: A Systematic Review.
Roughead T; Sewell D; Ryerson CJ; Fisher JH; Flexman AM
Anesth Analg; 2016 Dec; 123(6):1463-1468. PubMed ID: 27644057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing the Accuracy and Readability of Online Health Information for Patients With Pancreatic Cancer.
Storino A; Castillo-Angeles M; Watkins AA; Vargas C; Mancias JD; Bullock A; Demirjian A; Moser AJ; Kent TS
JAMA Surg; 2016 Sep; 151(9):831-7. PubMed ID: 27144966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluating the quality and readability of Internet information sources regarding the treatment of swallowing disorders.
O'Connell Ferster AP; Hu A
Ear Nose Throat J; 2017 Mar; 96(3):128-138. PubMed ID: 28346643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of the Accuracy of Online Information Regarding Trigger Finger.
Hinds RM; Gottschalk MB; Muppavarapu RC; Naik AA; Yang SS; Capo JT
J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol; 2016 Jun; 21(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 27454633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
