These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

451 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31170969)

  • 1. Trueness and precision of 5 intraoral scanners in the impressions of single and multiple implants: a comparative in vitro study.
    Mangano FG; Hauschild U; Veronesi G; Imburgia M; Mangano C; Admakin O
    BMC Oral Health; 2019 Jun; 19(1):101. PubMed ID: 31170969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Trueness of 12 intraoral scanners in the full-arch implant impression: a comparative in vitro study.
    Mangano FG; Admakin O; Bonacina M; Lerner H; Rutkunas V; Mangano C
    BMC Oral Health; 2020 Sep; 20(1):263. PubMed ID: 32962680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of four intraoral scanners in oral implantology: a comparative in vitro study.
    Imburgia M; Logozzo S; Hauschild U; Veronesi G; Mangano C; Mangano FG
    BMC Oral Health; 2017 Jun; 17(1):92. PubMed ID: 28577366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing the trueness of seven intraoral scanners and a physical impression on dentate human maxilla by a novel method.
    Nagy Z; Simon B; Mennito A; Evans Z; Renne W; Vág J
    BMC Oral Health; 2020 Apr; 20(1):97. PubMed ID: 32264943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Trueness and precision of 5 intraoral scanners for scanning edentulous and dentate complete-arch mandibular casts: A comparative in vitro study.
    Braian M; Wennerberg A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Aug; 122(2):129-136.e2. PubMed ID: 30885584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of six intraoral scanners for scanning complete-arch and 4-unit fixed partial dentures: An in vitro study.
    Diker B; Tak Ö
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Aug; 128(2):187-194. PubMed ID: 33558056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Solid index versus intraoral scanners in the full-arch implant impression: in vitro trueness evaluation.
    Mangano FG; Bonacina M; Mandelli F; Marchiori F
    BMC Res Notes; 2020 Nov; 13(1):504. PubMed ID: 33143732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Trueness and Precision of Four Intraoral Scanners in Oral Implantology: A Comparative in Vitro Study.
    Mangano FG; Veronesi G; Hauschild U; Mijiritsky E; Mangano C
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(9):e0163107. PubMed ID: 27684723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of operator experience, scanner type, and scan size on 3D scans.
    Resende CCD; Barbosa TAQ; Moura GF; Tavares LDN; Rizzante FAP; George FM; Neves FDD; Mendonça G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb; 125(2):294-299. PubMed ID: 32115221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Scan time and accuracy of full-arch scans with intraoral scanners: a comparative study on conditions of the intraoral head-simulator and the hand-held model].
    Wu MT; Tang SX; Peng LY; Han YT; Su YC; Wang X
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Jun; 56(6):570-575. PubMed ID: 34098673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of complete- and partial-arch impressions of actual intraoral scanning systems in vitro.
    Ender A; Zimmermann M; Mehl A
    Int J Comput Dent; 2019; 22(1):11-19. PubMed ID: 30848250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative reproducibility analysis of 6 intraoral scanners used on complex intracoronal preparations.
    Park JM; Kim RJ; Lee KW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):113-120. PubMed ID: 31027953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of 9 intraoral scanners for complete-arch image acquisition: A qualitative and quantitative evaluation.
    Kim RJ; Park JM; Shim JS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Dec; 120(6):895-903.e1. PubMed ID: 30006228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of different material substrates on the accuracy of 3 intraoral scanners: A single-blinded in vitro study.
    Michelinakis G; Apostolakis D; Tsagarakis A; Lampropoulos P
    Int J Prosthodont; 2022; 35(1):82–93. PubMed ID: 33751003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Influence of trueness for local finish lines of a full crown preparation on that of complete finish line].
    Jiang N; Bao XD; Yue L
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Sep; 53(1):102-108. PubMed ID: 33550343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In Vitro Comparison of the Accuracy of Conventional Impression and Four Intraoral Scanners in Four Different Implant Impression Scenarios.
    Alpkılıç DŞ; Değer Sİ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 35235619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of pulp chamber depth on the accuracy of endocrown scans made with different intraoral scanners versus an industrial scanner: An in vitro study.
    Gurpinar B; Tak O
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Mar; 127(3):430-437. PubMed ID: 33309210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Accuracy of three intraoral scans for primary impressions of edentulous jaws].
    Cao Y; Chen JK; Deng KH; Wang Y; Sun YC; Zhao YJ
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Feb; 52(1):129-137. PubMed ID: 32071476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intraoral digital scans-Part 1: Influence of ambient scanning light conditions on the accuracy (trueness and precision) of different intraoral scanners.
    Revilla-León M; Jiang P; Sadeghpour M; Piedra-Cascón W; Zandinejad A; Özcan M; Krishnamurthy VR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Sep; 124(3):372-378. PubMed ID: 31864638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing the feasibility and accuracy of digitizing edentulous jaws.
    Patzelt SB; Vonau S; Stampf S; Att W
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2013 Aug; 144(8):914-20. PubMed ID: 23904578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.