These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31171083)

  • 1. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: Valuable pieces of the clinical decision-making puzzle.
    Szekeres M; Valdes K
    J Hand Ther; 2019; 32(2):139-140. PubMed ID: 31171083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Meta-analysis: mistake or milestone in medicine?
    Foroutan F; Guyatt G; Alba AC; Ross H
    Heart; 2018 Oct; 104(19):1559-1561. PubMed ID: 29602884
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis in rheumatology: a gentle introduction for clinicians.
    Kelley GA; Kelley KS
    Clin Rheumatol; 2019 Aug; 38(8):2029-2038. PubMed ID: 31102085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses in Transplantation: Challenges and Pitfalls?
    Wong G; Sharma A; Teixeira-Pinto A; Howell M
    Transplantation; 2018 Sep; 102(9):1415-1418. PubMed ID: 30124633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Can we use levels of evidence to make a decision?
    Harvey E
    Can J Surg; 2020 Feb; 63(1):E86. PubMed ID: 32103654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Foundation of evidence-based decision making for health care managers, part 1: systematic review.
    Forrestal EJ
    Health Care Manag (Frederick); 2014; 33(2):97-109. PubMed ID: 24776828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evidence-Based Decision-Making 2: Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis.
    Bello A; Vandermeer B; Wiebe N; Garg AX; Tonelli M
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2249():405-428. PubMed ID: 33871856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Foundation of evidence-based decision making for health care managers-part II: meta-analysis and applying the evidence.
    Forrestal EJ
    Health Care Manag (Frederick); 2014; 33(3):230-44. PubMed ID: 25068878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Review articles, systematic reviews and meta-analyses: which can be trusted?
    Ryś P; Władysiuk M; Skrzekowska-Baran I; Małecki MT
    Pol Arch Med Wewn; 2009 Mar; 119(3):148-56. PubMed ID: 19514644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evidence-based practice: how to perform and use systematic reviews for clinical decision-making.
    Kranke P
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Sep; 27(9):763-72. PubMed ID: 20523217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating characteristics of PROSPERO records as predictors of eventual publication of non-Cochrane systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study protocol.
    Ruano J; Gómez-García F; Gay-Mimbrera J; Aguilar-Luque M; Fernández-Rueda JL; Fernández-Chaichio J; Alcalde-Mellado P; Carmona-Fernandez PJ; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Viguera-Guerra I; Franco-García F; Cárdenas-Aranzana M; Romero JLH; Gonzalez-Padilla M; Isla-Tejera B; Garcia-Nieto AV
    Syst Rev; 2018 Mar; 7(1):43. PubMed ID: 29523200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Focus is the new intelligence quotient for evidence-based practice.
    Jordan Z
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2019 Dec; 17(4):189-190. PubMed ID: 31714341
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Network meta-analysis in health care decision making.
    Rochwerg B; Brignardello-Petersen R; Guyatt G
    Med J Aust; 2018 Aug; 209(4):151-154. PubMed ID: 30107767
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improving the quality of the evidence - The necessity to lead by example.
    Simons M; Busch K; Avolio A; Kiat H; Davidson A
    J Clin Neurosci; 2017 Dec; 46():165-166. PubMed ID: 28974392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses.
    Scheidt S; Vavken P; Jacobs C; Koob S; Cucchi D; Kaup E; Wirtz DC; Wimmer MD
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2019 Aug; 157(4):392-399. PubMed ID: 30399626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach.
    Aromataris E; Fernandez R; Godfrey CM; Holly C; Khalil H; Tungpunkom P
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):132-40. PubMed ID: 26360830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Systematic review protocols: an introduction.
    Whiting LS
    Nurse Res; 2009; 17(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 19911652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Frequency of equivocation in surgical meta-evidence: a review of systematic reviews within IBD literature.
    Delaney JD; Holbrook JT; Dewar RK; Laws PJ; Engel AF
    BMJ Open; 2017 Dec; 7(12):e018715. PubMed ID: 29259063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in minimally invasive surgery.
    Antoniou SA; van Veenendaal N; Bonjer HJ
    Am J Surg; 2019 Jul; 218(1):232-233. PubMed ID: 29960646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Evidence-based Practice Center methods provide guidance on prioritization and selection of harms in systematic reviews.
    Chou R; Baker WL; Bañez LL; Iyer S; Myers ER; Newberry S; Pincock L; Robinson KA; Sardenga L; Sathe N; Springs S; Wilt TJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Jun; 98():98-104. PubMed ID: 29409913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.