These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31171483)

  • 1. Comparison of in situ cone beam computed tomography scan data with ex vivo optical scan data in the measurement of root surface area.
    Jia P; Yang G; Hu W; Chung KH; Zhao Y; Liu M; Chen CS
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2019 Nov; 128(5):552-557. PubMed ID: 31171483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography image segmentation of isolated tooth roots based on the dynamic threshold method.
    Su S; Liu YM; Zhan LP; Gao SY; He C; Zhang Q; Huang XF
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Oct; 23(1):752. PubMed ID: 37833773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of preemptively constructed, cone beam CT-, and CAD/CAM technology-based, individual Root Analogue Implant technique: an in vitro pilot investigation.
    Moin DA; Hassan B; Parsa A; Mercelis P; Wismeijer D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 May; 25(5):598-602. PubMed ID: 23278702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Designing a novel dental root analogue implant using cone beam computed tomography and CAD/CAM technology.
    Moin DA; Hassan B; Mercelis P; Wismeijer D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():25-7. PubMed ID: 22092354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of tooth root surface area using a three-dimensional scanning technique and cone beam computed tomographic reconstruction in vitro.
    Wang T; Pei X; Luo F; Jia L; Qin H; Cheng X; Xue Y; Wang J; Wan Q
    Arch Oral Biol; 2017 Dec; 84():13-18. PubMed ID: 28934648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Monitoring of typodont root movement via crown superimposition of single cone-beam computed tomography and consecutive intraoral scans.
    Lee RJ; Pham J; Choy M; Weissheimer A; Dougherty HL; Sameshima GT; Tong H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Mar; 145(3):399-409. PubMed ID: 24582031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the accuracy of cone beam computed tomography and medical computed tomography: implications for clinical diagnostics with guided surgery.
    Abboud M; Calvo-Guirado JL; Orentlicher G; Wahl G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):536-42. PubMed ID: 23527357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and direct measurement in the examination of the mandibular canal and adjacent structures.
    Kim TS; Caruso JM; Christensen H; Torabinejad M
    J Endod; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1191-4. PubMed ID: 20630297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of linear measurements from cone-beam computed tomography-derived surface models of different voxel sizes.
    Damstra J; Fourie Z; Huddleston Slater JJ; Ren Y
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jan; 137(1):16.e1-6; discussion 16-7. PubMed ID: 20122425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of different cone beam computed tomography and multi-slice computed tomography scan parameters on virtual three-dimensional model accuracy using a highly precise ex vivo evaluation method.
    Matta RE; von Wilmowsky C; Neuhuber W; Lell M; Neukam FW; Adler W; Wichmann M; Bergauer B
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 May; 44(5):632-6. PubMed ID: 27017101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of in-vitro tooth volumetric measurements from cone-beam computed tomography.
    Ye N; Jian F; Xue J; Wang S; Liao L; Huang W; Yang X; Zhou Y; Lai W; Li J; Wang J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Dec; 142(6):879-87. PubMed ID: 23195374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of the primary stability of root analog zirconia implants designed using cone beam computed tomography software by means of the Periotest® device: An ex vivo study. A preliminary report.
    Matys J; Świder K; Flieger R; Dominiak M
    Adv Clin Exp Med; 2017 Aug; 26(5):803-809. PubMed ID: 29068576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of 2 root surface area measurement methods: 3-dimensional laser scanning and cone-beam computed tomography.
    Tasanapanont J; Apisariyakul J; Wattanachai T; Sriwilas P; Midtbø M; Jotikasthira D
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2017 Jun; 47(2):117-122. PubMed ID: 28680848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A novel three-dimensional quantitative assessment method for abnormal root morphology of the maxillary premolars in vivo on cone-beam computed tomography.
    Liu J; Xu X; Wang XE; Jia PC; Pan MQ; Xu L
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Jun; 22(1):229. PubMed ID: 35681195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [A method for rapid extracting three-dimensional root model of vivo tooth from cone beam computed tomography data based on the anatomical characteristics of periodontal ligament].
    Zhao YJ; Wang SW; Liu Y; Wang Y
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2017 Feb; 49(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 28203004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Geometric accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging-derived virtual 3-dimensional bone surface models of the mandible in comparison to computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography: A porcine cadaver study.
    Probst FA; Burian E; Malenova Y; Lyutskanova P; Stumbaum MJ; Ritschl LM; Kronthaler S; Karampinos D; Probst M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2021 Oct; 23(5):779-788. PubMed ID: 34318580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tooth and root size as determined from 0.25- and 0.30-mm voxel size cone-beam CT imaging when contrasted to micro-CT scans (0.06 mm): An ex vivo study.
    Coutsiers Morell GF; Berlin-Broner Y; Flores-Mir C; Heo G
    J Orthod; 2022 Jun; 49(2):174-178. PubMed ID: 34903069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detection and measurement of artificial periapical lesions by cone-beam computed tomography.
    Liang YH; Jiang L; Gao XJ; Shemesh H; Wesselink PR; Wu MK
    Int Endod J; 2014 Apr; 47(4):332-8. PubMed ID: 23815501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing the in vivo diagnostic accuracy of digital periapical radiography with cone-beam computed tomography for the detection of vertical root fracture.
    Chavda R; Mannocci F; Andiappan M; Patel S
    J Endod; 2014 Oct; 40(10):1524-9. PubMed ID: 25154316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Three-dimensional monitoring of root movement during orthodontic treatment.
    Lee RJ; Weissheimer A; Pham J; Go L; de Menezes LM; Redmond WR; Loos JF; Sameshima GT; Tong H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Jan; 147(1):132-42. PubMed ID: 25533080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.