These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3117278)

  • 1. Towards a reduction in publication bias.
    Newcombe RG
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1987 Sep; 295(6599):656-9. PubMed ID: 3117278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is the statistical assessment of papers submitted to the "British Medical Journal" effective?
    Gardner MJ; Altman DG; Jones DR; Machin D
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1983 May; 286(6376):1485-8. PubMed ID: 6405855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Commercially funded and United States-based research is more likely to be published; good-quality studies with negative outcomes are not.
    Lynch JR; Cunningham MR; Warme WJ; Schaad DC; Wolf FM; Leopold SS
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 May; 89(5):1010-8. PubMed ID: 17473138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Statistical Considerations in Otolaryngology Journals.
    Blakley BW; Janzen B
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Nov; 157(5):745-747. PubMed ID: 28463544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of study outcome on submission and acceptance metrics for peer reviewed medical journals: six year retrospective review of all completed GlaxoSmithKline human drug research studies.
    Evoniuk G; Mansi B; DeCastro B; Sykes J
    BMJ; 2017 Apr; 357():j1726. PubMed ID: 28432051
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An exploratory study of statistical assessment of papers published in the British Medical Journal.
    Gardner MJ; Bond J
    JAMA; 1990 Mar; 263(10):1355-7. PubMed ID: 2304214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Will publication bias vanish in the age of online journals?
    Berlin JA
    Online J Curr Clin Trials; 1992 Jul; Doc No 12():[1337 words; 10 paragraphs]. PubMed ID: 1343607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Publication bias in the anesthesiology literature.
    De Oliveira GS; Chang R; Kendall MC; Fitzgerald PC; McCarthy RJ
    Anesth Analg; 2012 May; 114(5):1042-8. PubMed ID: 22344237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An assessment of the statistical procedures used in original papers published in the SAMJ during 1992.
    Becker PJ; Viljoen E; Wolmarans L; IJsselmuiden CB
    S Afr Med J; 1995 Sep; 85(9):881-4. PubMed ID: 8545749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact Factors and Prediction of Popular Topics in a Journal.
    Nielsen MB; Seitz K
    Ultraschall Med; 2016 Aug; 37(4):343-5. PubMed ID: 27490462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fate of manuscripts rejected for publication in the AJR.
    Chew FS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1991 Mar; 156(3):627-32. PubMed ID: 1899764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Peer-review and publication of research protocols and proposals: a role for open access journals.
    Eysenbach G
    J Med Internet Res; 2004 Sep; 6(3):e37. PubMed ID: 15471763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The ironic effect of significant results on the credibility of multiple-study articles.
    Schimmack U
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Dec; 17(4):551-66. PubMed ID: 22924598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Getting published in peer-reviewed journals.
    Dimitroulis G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Dec; 40(12):1342-5. PubMed ID: 22142552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Characteristics and fate of orthodontic articles submitted for publication: An exploratory study of the American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics.
    Farjo N; Turpin DL; Coley RY; Feng J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Jun; 147(6):680-90. PubMed ID: 26038071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preferential publication of editorial board members in medical specialty journals.
    Luty J; Arokiadass SM; Easow JM; Anapreddy JR
    J Med Ethics; 2009 Mar; 35(3):200-2. PubMed ID: 19251974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Meta-analysis: Problems with Russian Publications.
    Verbitskaya EV
    Int J Risk Saf Med; 2015; 27 Suppl 1():S89-90. PubMed ID: 26639728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does bad inference drive out good?
    Marozzi M
    Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 2015 Jul; 42(7):727-33. PubMed ID: 25974387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preventing the ends from justifying the means: withholding results to address publication bias in peer-review.
    Button KS; Bal L; Clark A; Shipley T
    BMC Psychol; 2016 Dec; 4(1):59. PubMed ID: 27903302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The prevalence of negative studies with inadequate statistical power: an analysis of the plastic surgery literature.
    Chung KC; Kalliainen LK; Spilson SV; Walters MR; Kim HM
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 Jan; 109(1):1-6; discussion 7-8. PubMed ID: 11786783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.