These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. A comparison of live birth rates and perinatal outcomes between cryopreserved oocytes and cryopreserved embryos. Ho JR; Woo I; Louie K; Salem W; Jabara SI; Bendikson KA; Paulson RJ; Chung K J Assist Reprod Genet; 2017 Oct; 34(10):1359-1366. PubMed ID: 28718080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Predicting the likelihood of live birth for elective oocyte cryopreservation: a counseling tool for physicians and patients. Goldman RH; Racowsky C; Farland LV; Munné S; Ribustello L; Fox JH Hum Reprod; 2017 Apr; 32(4):853-859. PubMed ID: 28166330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Conventional ovarian stimulation and single embryo transfer for IVF/ICSI. How many oocytes do we need to maximize cumulative live birth rates after utilization of all fresh and frozen embryos? Drakopoulos P; Blockeel C; Stoop D; Camus M; de Vos M; Tournaye H; Polyzos NP Hum Reprod; 2016 Feb; 31(2):370-6. PubMed ID: 26724797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Usage and cost-effectiveness of elective oocyte freezing: a retrospective observational study. Yang IJ; Wu MY; Chao KH; Wei SY; Tsai YY; Huang TC; Chen MJ; Chen SU Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2022 Aug; 20(1):123. PubMed ID: 35974356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Cumulative live birth rates and number of oocytes retrieved in women of advanced age. A single centre analysis including 4500 women ≥38 years old. Devesa M; Tur R; Rodríguez I; Coroleu B; Martínez F; Polyzos NP Hum Reprod; 2018 Nov; 33(11):2010-2017. PubMed ID: 30272168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Clinical application of oocyte vitrification: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Cobo A; Diaz C Fertil Steril; 2011 Aug; 96(2):277-85. PubMed ID: 21718983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Cumulative live birth rates according to the number of oocytes retrieved following the "freeze-all" strategy. Zhao Z; Shi H; Li J; Zhang Y; Chen C; Guo Y Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2020 Feb; 18(1):14. PubMed ID: 32087702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The association between the number of oocytes retrieved for IVF, perinatal outcome and obstetric complications. Magnusson Å; Wennerholm UB; Källén K; Petzold M; Thurin-Kjellberg A; Bergh C Hum Reprod; 2018 Oct; 33(10):1939-1947. PubMed ID: 30124838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Reduction of multiple pregnancies in the advanced maternal age population after implementation of an elective single embryo transfer policy coupled with enhanced embryo selection: pre- and post-intervention study. Ubaldi FM; Capalbo A; Colamaria S; Ferrero S; Maggiulli R; Vajta G; Sapienza F; Cimadomo D; Giuliani M; Gravotta E; Vaiarelli A; Rienzi L Hum Reprod; 2015 Sep; 30(9):2097-106. PubMed ID: 26150408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Larger oocyte cohorts maximize fresh IVF cycle birth rates and availability of surplus high-quality blastocysts for cryopreservation. Connell MT; Richter KS; Devine K; Hill MJ; DeCherney AH; Doyle JO; Tucker MJ; Levy MJ Reprod Biomed Online; 2019 May; 38(5):711-723. PubMed ID: 30922557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The total pregnancy potential per oocyte aspiration after assisted reproduction-in how many cycles are biologically competent oocytes available? Lemmen JG; Rodríguez NM; Andreasen LD; Loft A; Ziebe S J Assist Reprod Genet; 2016 Jul; 33(7):849-54. PubMed ID: 27052832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Clinical outcomes following cryopreservation of blastocysts by vitrification or slow freezing: a population-based cohort study. Li Z; Wang YA; Ledger W; Edgar DH; Sullivan EA Hum Reprod; 2014 Dec; 29(12):2794-801. PubMed ID: 25316444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Oocyte efficiency: does live birth rate differ when analyzing cryopreserved and fresh oocytes on a per-oocyte basis? Goldman KN; Noyes NL; Knopman JM; McCaffrey C; Grifo JA Fertil Steril; 2013 Sep; 100(3):712-7. PubMed ID: 23721713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Clinical effects of oocyte cryopreservation in assisted reproduction technology]. Wang W; Yan ZJ; Cai LB; Chai DC; Liu CZ; Mao YD; Liu JY Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Oct; 88(39):2755-8. PubMed ID: 19080449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Vitrification of oocytes produces high pregnancy rates when carried out in fertile women. Kim TJ; Laufer LR; Hong SW Fertil Steril; 2010 Feb; 93(2):467-74. PubMed ID: 19217099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Six years' experience in ovum donation using vitrified oocytes: report of cumulative outcomes, impact of storage time, and development of a predictive model for oocyte survival rate. Cobo A; Garrido N; Pellicer A; Remohí J Fertil Steril; 2015 Dec; 104(6):1426-34.e1-8. PubMed ID: 26353081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Analysis of oocyte cryopreservation in assisted reproduction: the Italian National Register data from 2005 to 2007. Scaravelli G; Vigiliano V; Mayorga JM; Bolli S; De Luca R; D'Aloja P Reprod Biomed Online; 2010 Oct; 21(4):496-500. PubMed ID: 20797902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]