148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31173770)
1. Beta-gamma oscillation reveals learning from unexpected reward in learners versus non-learners.
Wang J; Zhang J; Li P; Martens S; Luo Y
Neuropsychologia; 2019 Aug; 131():266-274. PubMed ID: 31173770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. When theory and biology differ: The relationship between reward prediction errors and expectancy.
Williams CC; Hassall CD; Trska R; Holroyd CB; Krigolson OE
Biol Psychol; 2017 Oct; 129():265-272. PubMed ID: 28923360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How we learn to make decisions: rapid propagation of reinforcement learning prediction errors in humans.
Krigolson OE; Hassall CD; Handy TC
J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Mar; 26(3):635-44. PubMed ID: 24168216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Feedback delay impaired reinforcement learning: Principal components analysis of Reward Positivity.
Yin H; Wang Y; Zhang X; Li P
Neurosci Lett; 2018 Oct; 685():179-184. PubMed ID: 30170042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Electrophysiological measures reveal the role of anterior cingulate cortex in learning from unreliable feedback.
Li P; Peng W; Li H; Holroyd CB
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2018 Oct; 18(5):949-963. PubMed ID: 29992483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Acute stress impairs reward positivity effect in probabilistic learning.
Zhang X; Li P; Chen J; Li H
Psychophysiology; 2020 Apr; 57(4):e13531. PubMed ID: 31953853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. It was not MY fault: event-related brain potentials in active and observational learning from feedback.
Bellebaum C; Kobza S; Thiele S; Daum I
Cereb Cortex; 2010 Dec; 20(12):2874-83. PubMed ID: 20308202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Frontal theta oscillatory activity is a common mechanism for the computation of unexpected outcomes and learning rate.
Mas-Herrero E; Marco-Pallarés J
J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Mar; 26(3):447-58. PubMed ID: 24188368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Processing of action- but not stimulus-related prediction errors differs between active and observational feedback learning.
Kobza S; Bellebaum C
Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jan; 66():75-87. PubMed ID: 25446969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Feedback information and the reward positivity.
Cockburn J; Holroyd CB
Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Oct; 132(Pt B):243-251. PubMed ID: 29208491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Beta oscillations following performance feedback predict subsequent recall of task-relevant information.
HajiHosseini A; Hutcherson CA; Holroyd CB
Sci Rep; 2020 Sep; 10(1):15114. PubMed ID: 32934274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reward positivity: Reward prediction error or salience prediction error?
Heydari S; Holroyd CB
Psychophysiology; 2016 Aug; 53(8):1185-92. PubMed ID: 27184070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The application of reward learning in the real world: Changes in the reward positivity amplitude reflect learning in a medical education context.
Williams CC; Hecker KG; Paget MK; Coderre SP; Burak KW; Wright B; Krigolson OE
Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Oct; 132(Pt B):236-242. PubMed ID: 29111454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Alterations in the amplitude and burst rate of beta oscillations impair reward-dependent motor learning in anxiety.
Sporn S; Hein T; Herrojo Ruiz M
Elife; 2020 May; 9():. PubMed ID: 32423530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The neural coding of expected and unexpected monetary performance outcomes: dissociations between active and observational learning.
Bellebaum C; Jokisch D; Gizewski ER; Forsting M; Daum I
Behav Brain Res; 2012 Feb; 227(1):241-51. PubMed ID: 22074898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of feedback delay and agency on feedback-locked beta and theta power during reinforcement learning.
Weismüller B; Kullmann J; Hoenen M; Bellebaum C
Psychophysiology; 2019 Oct; 56(10):e13428. PubMed ID: 31245849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. EEG oscillatory activity associated to monetary gain and loss signals in a learning task: effects of attentional impulsivity and learning ability.
De Pascalis V; Varriale V; Rotonda M
Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Jul; 85(1):68-78. PubMed ID: 21704660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cross-task individual differences in error processing: neural, electrophysiological, and genetic components.
Frank MJ; D'Lauro C; Curran T
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2007 Dec; 7(4):297-308. PubMed ID: 18189003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The better, the bigger: The effect of graded positive performance feedback on the reward positivity.
Frömer R; Stürmer B; Sommer W
Biol Psychol; 2016 Feb; 114():61-8. PubMed ID: 26756995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. High-learners present larger mid-frontal theta power and connectivity in response to incorrect performance feedback.
Luft CD; Nolte G; Bhattacharya J
J Neurosci; 2013 Jan; 33(5):2029-38. PubMed ID: 23365240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
