These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31174574)

  • 21. Impact of Oncology Drug Review Times on Public Funding Recommendations.
    Hussain M; Wong C; Taguedong E; Verma S; Mahsin M; Karim S; Lee-Ying R; Ezeife DA
    Curr Oncol; 2023 Aug; 30(8):7706-7712. PubMed ID: 37623039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. What Does the New Ontario Pharmacare Plan offer Children and Young Adults with Rare Disorders?
    Rawson N
    J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol; 2017 Dec; 24(3):90-98. PubMed ID: 29432671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Review of regulatory recommendations for orphan drug submissions in the Netherlands and Scotland: focus on the underlying pharmacoeconomic evaluations.
    Vegter S; Rozenbaum MH; Postema R; Tolley K; Postma MJ
    Clin Ther; 2010 Aug; 32(9):1651-61. PubMed ID: 20974323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Determinants of the Cancer Drug Funding Process in Canada.
    Gotfrit J; Jackson A; Shin JJW; Stewart DJ; Mallick R; Wheatley-Price P
    Curr Oncol; 2022 Mar; 29(3):1997-2007. PubMed ID: 35323362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Can Standard Health Technology Assessment Approaches Help Guide the Price of Orphan Drugs in Canada? A Review of Submissions to the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health Common Drug Review.
    Balijepalli C; Gullapalli L; Druyts E; Yan K; Desai K; Barakat S; Locklin J
    Clinicoecon Outcomes Res; 2020; 12():445-457. PubMed ID: 32922050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The impact of willingness-to-pay threshold on price reduction recommendations for oncology drugs: a review of assessments conducted by the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health.
    Balijepalli C; Gullapalli L; Joshy J; Rawson NS
    J Comp Eff Res; 2024 May; 13(5):e230178. PubMed ID: 38567953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Authorization and reimbursement of orphan drugs in an international comparison].
    Roll K; Stargardt T; Schreyögg J
    Gesundheitswesen; 2011 Aug; 73(8-9):504-14. PubMed ID: 20848380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparing Manufacturer Submitted and Pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review Reanalysed Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratios for Novel Oncology Drugs.
    Saluja R; Jiao T; Koshy L; Cheung M; Chan KKW
    Curr Oncol; 2021 Jan; 28(1):606-618. PubMed ID: 33498460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An impact analysis of the implementation of health technology assessment for new treatment of orphan diseases in Japan.
    Kogushi K; Ogawa T; Ikeda S
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2020 Oct; 20(5):455-471. PubMed ID: 31496361
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of the copayment reduction system on accessibility to orphan drugs in South Korea.
    Hwang SE; Kim M; Hong Y; Lee D; Kim T; Park J; Bae J; Lee JH
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2023 Jun; 23(5):519-525. PubMed ID: 36922505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. International experiences in multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) for evaluating orphan drugs: a scoping review.
    Lasalvia P; Prieto-Pinto L; Moreno M; Castrillón J; Romano G; Garzón-Orjuela N; Rosselli D
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2019 Aug; 19(4):409-420. PubMed ID: 31210065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cost Effectiveness of Monoclonal Antibody Therapy for Rare Diseases: A Systematic Review.
    Park T; Griggs SK; Suh DC
    BioDrugs; 2015 Aug; 29(4):259-74. PubMed ID: 26263903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Financial conflicts of interest of clinicians making submissions to the pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review: a descriptive study.
    Lexchin J
    BMJ Open; 2019 Jul; 9(7):e030750. PubMed ID: 31350254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Characteristics of clinician input in Canadian funding decisions for cancer drugs: a cross-sectional study based on CADTH reimbursement recommendations.
    Jenei K; Meyers DE
    BMJ Open; 2023 Oct; 13(10):e066378. PubMed ID: 37844982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Systematic review on the evaluation criteria of orphan medicines in Central and Eastern European countries.
    Zelei T; Molnár MJ; Szegedi M; Kaló Z
    Orphanet J Rare Dis; 2016 Jun; 11(1):72. PubMed ID: 27259284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Limits on use of health economic assessments for rare diseases.
    Hyry HI; Stern AD; Cox TM; Roos JC
    QJM; 2014 Mar; 107(3):241-5. PubMed ID: 24453281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Expensive drugs for rare disorders: to treat or not to treat? The case of enzyme replacement therapy for mucopolysaccharidosis VI.
    Schlander M; Beck M
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2009 May; 25(5):1285-93. PubMed ID: 19366306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Health Technology Assessment Process for Oncology Drugs: Impact of CADTH Changes on Public Payer Reimbursement Recommendations.
    Binder L; Ghadban M; Sit C; Barnard K
    Curr Oncol; 2022 Mar; 29(3):1514-1526. PubMed ID: 35323327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Engaging the Canadian public on reimbursement decision-making for drugs for rare diseases: a national online survey.
    Polisena J; Burgess M; Mitton C; Lynd LD
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2017 May; 17(1):372. PubMed ID: 28549479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Historical and projected public spending on drugs for rare diseases in Canada between 2010 and 2025.
    Lech R; Chow G; Mann K; Mott P; Malmberg C; Forte L
    Orphanet J Rare Dis; 2022 Oct; 17(1):371. PubMed ID: 36209128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.